Well, bumpage as judgement was passed today. I luckily timed my journey home to coincide with start of the always excellent PM on Radio 4, and it was an eye opener.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00cm809
Listen from about 5 minutes in.
Essentially the NOTW's argument was that they had every right to publish a video taken inside someone's own private property without his consent because they found his conduct immoral. Not illegal, immoral. I love the bit where the editor claims that they have been stifled by 'judges unfriendly to freedom of expression'- well what about Mosely's right to freely express his sexuality, you hypocritical idiot?
But the lawyer interviewed from 9.00 onwards really takes the biscuit
.