Page 79 of 100 FirstFirst ... 2939495969767778798081828999 ... LastLast
Results 1,249 to 1,264 of 1594

Thread: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

  1. #1249
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    12 times in 11 posts
    • flearider's system
      • Motherboard:
      • asus crosshair v
      • CPU:
      • amd phem x6 1090t @4.1ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16gb g-skill sniper 1.35v @1872
      • Storage:
      • corsair performance pro 128 + 1tb hd space
      • Graphics card(s):
      • sapphire 5870
      • PSU:
      • corsair 750 tx
      • Case:
      • modded lian-li pc70 2x tripple rads
      • Operating System:
      • win 7 ulti
      • Monitor(s):
      • toshiba 32"

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    question .. will the new piledriver be getting a better memory controller .. that is native 1600mhz or higher ??instead of an upto 1866 after thought ?

  2. #1250
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    What? The BD memory controller does support up to 1866 'native', by which I assume you mean without overclocking. The speed the memory runs at depends on the RAM itself, you need 1866 RAM to run at that speed, stock.

  3. #1251
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    12 times in 11 posts
    • flearider's system
      • Motherboard:
      • asus crosshair v
      • CPU:
      • amd phem x6 1090t @4.1ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16gb g-skill sniper 1.35v @1872
      • Storage:
      • corsair performance pro 128 + 1tb hd space
      • Graphics card(s):
      • sapphire 5870
      • PSU:
      • corsair 750 tx
      • Case:
      • modded lian-li pc70 2x tripple rads
      • Operating System:
      • win 7 ulti
      • Monitor(s):
      • toshiba 32"

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    What? The BD memory controller does support up to 1866 'native', by which I assume you mean without overclocking. The speed the memory runs at depends on the RAM itself, you need 1866 RAM to run at that speed, stock.
    i ment this ...
    http://gskill.us/forum/announcement.php?f=2

    and to answer my own question ....
    A Built-in Memory Controller on Piledriver chips would be directly connected to 4 DDR3 DIMMS with stock frequency support of 1866Mhz in Dual Channel Mode.
    Last edited by flearider; 05-02-2012 at 05:05 PM.

  4. Received thanks from:

    watercooled (05-02-2012)

  5. #1252
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Thanks for that, I wasn't aware of it. A friend has just build a BD system and has been having occasional BSOD and while I suspected RAM settings or faulty RAM, this pretty much confirms it. However, I run 4 sticks myself on Thuban without problems.

  6. #1253
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,780
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked
    2,837 times in 2,216 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Interesting:

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/d...s_for_AMD.html

    OTH,they could be reading too much into the statement as both IBM and GF are part of the consortium which develops SOI technology.

  7. #1254
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Yeah definitely interesting, GloFo have been holding AMD back with delays, yield issues and so on. As much as I want them to be a successful and competitive fab, there are at least a number of competing fabs in existence, rather than the two major competing x86 CPU compaies.

  8. #1255
    "make it so" scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    9,245
    Thanks
    726
    Thanked
    1,145 times in 1,009 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X4 905e
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical VLP
      • Storage:
      • 750GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 7750 Low Profile
      • PSU:
      • FSP 250W TFX
      • Case:
      • AOpen H360b
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • IBM ThinkVision C220P (6735-60N) (22" CRT)

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Quote Originally Posted by flearider View Post
    i ment this ...
    That's been the case ever since AMD first built a processor with IMC. More DIMMs have always meant a lower officially supported speed.

    Let's be honest, Intel's IMC is some distance behind when it comes to officially supported memory speeds...

  9. #1256
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Hmm, friend is running 1333MHz RAM so possibly not...

    Still trying to get him to run Memtest.

  10. #1257
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,780
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked
    2,837 times in 2,216 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat


  11. #1258
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Maidenhead
    Posts
    8,153
    Thanks
    880
    Thanked
    586 times in 490 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Corsair H100 with Akasa Piranha fans) @4.7Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB Corsair Force GT, 2 x Seagate Momentus XT 320GB(RAID 0), 2 x Samsung F3 500GB (RAID 1)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x MSI GTX660 Ti Power Edition
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • Plus Net 80/20

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    AMD sponsor research and its conclusion is that it puts AMD back in the games.

    Interesting if true but it seems something we have known all along, its just implementing it which is the issue.

  12. #1259
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,780
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked
    2,837 times in 2,216 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit View Post
    AMD sponsor research and its conclusion is that it puts AMD back in the games.

    Interesting if true but it seems something we have known all along, its just implementing it which is the issue.
    From the article:

    "We will know more when the team presents its research on February 27 at the International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture."

    Its peer-reviewed research. It is open to other researchers to investigate the claims. Intel and Nvidia do exactly the same thing - most of those research groups which claim xyz with those companies equipment in many cases have funding form them too. Intel and Nvidia also fund research too in universities and it has been the case for yonks. Even Apple does so(they have equipment grants for example).
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 08-02-2012 at 10:24 AM.

  13. #1260
    "make it so" scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    9,245
    Thanks
    726
    Thanked
    1,145 times in 1,009 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X4 905e
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical VLP
      • Storage:
      • 750GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 7750 Low Profile
      • PSU:
      • FSP 250W TFX
      • Case:
      • AOpen H360b
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • IBM ThinkVision C220P (6735-60N) (22" CRT)

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Two edits to the article already

    Hmmm, looks like interesting research. Not sure how they simulated an APU with L3 cache, as far as I know there aren't any in the immediate offing, but it's basically someone showing that software can handle what AMD want to do in hardware. It's hardly a revolution, just a new way of getting data to the GPU when it needs it. Wonder how much complexity it adds to coding / debugging and the compiler...

  14. #1261
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    This is the sort of thing I've been expecting (and posting about) since the APU was announced. And it's the sort of thing AMD are ultimately hoping for - using at as an APU, not just a CPU with the GPU used for graphics. The compute-oriented GPU architectures should help a lot too.

  15. #1262
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,780
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked
    2,837 times in 2,216 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    A good article about the future direction of AMD CPUs:

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/22452/1

    Looks like the new CTO acknowledges they need more than 10% to 15% improvement in CPU performance each year.

  16. #1263
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,780
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked
    2,837 times in 2,216 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Some more details about the CPUs AMD is releasing this year:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/160274/AM...10-Series.html

    So,the top end Trinity A10 will have an HD7660D IGP. This does indicate the IGP will be in between an HD6570 and HD6670 GPU(these are being rebranded as the HD7570 and HD7670 IIRC).

    Hopefully,the A10 has an IGP which is close to an HD6570 GDDR5 or HD5670 GDDR5 in performance. The existing A8 has an IGP similar in performance to an HD5550 GDDR5.
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 10-02-2012 at 12:57 PM.

  17. #1264
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks
    1,245
    Thanked
    562 times in 497 posts

    Re: AMD - Bulldozer Chitchat

    Pretty impressive when you consider what the next Xbox is meant to be using for its GPU!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Benchmarking clash between NVIDIA and AMD
    By GheeTsar in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21-10-2010, 05:36 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 27-08-2010, 02:10 PM
  3. AMD price drops to follow Conroe launch
    By Steve in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 17-06-2006, 07:49 PM
  4. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 20-04-2005, 08:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •