Tasty indeed! Like me getting my Pentium E5300 to 3.46 and out-handbraking an E8400
Does the e6300 have less cache per core than the higher grade Conroes?
Tasty indeed! Like me getting my Pentium E5300 to 3.46 and out-handbraking an E8400
Does the e6300 have less cache per core than the higher grade Conroes?
The Conroe e6300 has 2Mb L2 cache, some higher Conroes have 4Mb, the Wolfdale e6300 has 3Mb (and 2.8GHz rather than 1.86GHz stock compared to the Conroe).
Hmm, I wondered if the cache was limiting it but that's no less cache than most of the other processors. Curious...
I don't suppose anyone's still running a Q6600 are they? It'd be interesting to see how such a venerable chip holds up!
Got one, but I think it's in an x86 box rather than x64 And I'm not convinced my stepson will take kindly to me reinstalling his OS for him! I'll be testing a Phenom II 905e eventually, but that will almost certainly be after I've moved house. tbh, I've got quite a lot of boxes on 32bit Win 7 at the minute: it's really frustrating that there's no 32bit exe for Cinebench...
Wonder how would run under a live OS, be it Windows or Linux...
You reckon I should see if I can get a live Linux distro with in wrapped in? Might work, I guess...
EDIT: Or I suppose I could run a live linux then install Cinebench, but that sounds like more work
Does it needs installation or can it be carried from previously installed machines, form of a portable version?
Ah, dammit you're right: Windows and Mac OSX only. Well that's a bit of a pain....
A8-5600K, slight overclock @ 3800Mhz (Turbo @ 4200Mhz but for some reason under no circumstances I seen the machine reach or activate it, maybe because I turned the APM off). IGP default frequencies 256 shaders @ 760Mhz, memory dual channel DDR3 @ 1866Mhz at 1-9-9-9-24.
A8-5600K, slight overclock @ 4000Mhz, Turbo disabled, APM disabled. IGP underclocked 256 shaders @ 400Mhz, memory dual channel DDR3 @ 1866Mhz at 1-9-9-9-24. Generally just to see the performance difference.
Last edited by Bonebreaker777; 17-11-2013 at 01:51 PM.
i5-4670k @ 4.2Ghz (if I am not mistaken), DDR3 2133Mhz 1-11-11-11-30
HD7770 as per GPU-Z, Core @ 1000Mhz, memory @ 1125
Anyone know how disk intensive Cinebench is? I have a cunning plan for a portable benchmark environment, but it would have fairly low disk performance...
That'd require me to get round to downloading and running the benchmark first, which I haven't done yet I thought someone who'd already run it might have an idea. If no-one else knows I guess I'll get round to doing that (or perhaps I'll just do two runs on one of the my machines to get a comparison score).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)