Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 23 of 23

Thread: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

  1. #17
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    Quote Originally Posted by KeyboardDemon View Post
    @Cat: That's right, Intel are saving money as they are using less in terms of materials used in the production costs of these processors which are lower than they've ever been. If Intel are making cost savings they should be able to pass those savings on to consumers.
    Anandtech does a teardown of the chip:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/9505/s...ckage-analysis



    Broadwell delidded:

    http://www.3dnews.ru/assets/external...4/delidded.jpg

    Broadwell is a few times larger.

    Quote Originally Posted by pandamonia View Post
    Cost per transistor goes up when a new node comes on line.

    It takes time for yield to increase.
    Except,the Core i7 5775C uses the same 14nm process,and has more complex packaging when compared to the Core i7 6700K due to the separate L4 cache. When you include the L4 cache,and the larger IGP in the chip the die area is two to three times larger than the Core i7 6700K. Yet the Core i7 5775C and the Core i7 6700K cost the same!
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 17-08-2015 at 02:07 AM.

  2. #18
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    83
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    If i buy x99 - will the new CPU's be coming out for it in the future? and if so when?

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    951
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    34 times in 34 posts
    • Marcvs's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 5810T
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7/Mac OSX Lion
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 22" (1920*1200)

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    We might see BDW-E Around april next year, but honestly wouldnt be that surprised if they skip it. Skylake-E will be a new platform..

  4. #20
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    83
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    yeah - that's what I'm afraid of, just going for skylake - fits my needs

  5. #21
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    I think that it's unlikely that they'll skip Broadwell-E, whether Broadwell-E is worth it as an upgrade is debatable considering the 5% performance difference between Haswell and Broadwell at the same clock speed. The only way Broadwell-E would be worthwhile is if the £500 part, the 6930k, is an 8 core instead of a 6 core.

    If you overclock, I think you may be underestimating the benefit of the 2 extra cores in rendering and encoding workloads, especially since there is only around a 10% performance increase going from Haswell to skylake, if that. However, skylake is still a capable performer.

  6. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    951
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    34 times in 34 posts
    • Marcvs's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 5810T
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7/Mac OSX Lion
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 22" (1920*1200)

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    Word on the street is BDW-E in Q1 2016 and SKL-E in Q3-2016.

    Quote Originally Posted by ltron View Post
    I think that it's unlikely that they'll skip Broadwell-E, whether Broadwell-E is worth it as an upgrade is debatable considering the 5% performance difference between Haswell and Broadwell at the same clock speed. The only way Broadwell-E would be worthwhile is if the £500 part, the 6930k, is an 8 core instead of a 6 core.

    If you overclock, I think you may be underestimating the benefit of the 2 extra cores in rendering and encoding workloads, especially since there is only around a 10% performance increase going from Haswell to skylake, if that. However, skylake is still a capable performer.

  7. #23
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Z170, Skylake 6770K vs X99 5820K

    An X99 system would have the best performance there is at least a 20% performance increase over a 6700K in applications which support hyperthreading and 6 cores no a 5820K which most editing/rendering software does also a 980Ti would have the necessary power for a Gsync monitor and a 1080p monitor at the same time even if you went for the 6700K but the X99 system will be the best performance you can get right now until Skylake-E/Broadwell-E X99 systems will not be beaten by anything else

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •