Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 24 of 24

Thread: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

  1. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,129
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    189 times in 160 posts

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    I find that not looking for faults and just enjoying the games you play is a much better upgrade than nitpicking and finding fault in everything.

  2. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    139
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    Wassogood about 16:10? I thought everything was sort of 4:3 ratios 'cause that's what Tele is in and that's what your eyes are meant to see like. Is 16:10 super bettererer?

  3. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,129
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    189 times in 160 posts

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    Quote Originally Posted by PorcupineTime View Post
    Wassogood about 16:10? I thought everything was sort of 4:3 ratios 'cause that's what Tele is in and that's what your eyes are meant to see like. Is 16:10 super bettererer?
    1200 vs 1080... moar verticle is better.

  4. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    139
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    What about 1440p and 4K though, aren't they back to 16:9 ratios?

  5. #21
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,024
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,382 times in 2,719 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    Quote Originally Posted by abaxas View Post
    1200 vs 1080... moar verticle is better.
    4:3 would be even more vertical.

  6. #22
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    Quote Originally Posted by PorcupineTime View Post
    What about 1440p and 4K though, aren't they back to 16:9 ratios?
    Yes. Because the only thing people do with their computers is watch widescreen movies. I thought everyone knew that?

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    4:3 would be even more vertical.
    5:4 is even better, by that measure

    I do miss my 2048x1536 CRT monitor - afaict you simply can't buy 4:3 monitors with that high a res any more (which is odd given you can get 9.7" tablets with it...). There are lots of purposes for which a 1.4142:1 monitor would be ideal, but try finding one of those (or even working out what resolution is would be ).

    EDIT: OK, a quick google shows that HTC were prepping a 9" Nexus tablet with a 2048x1440 screen, which is probably as near as you can get to the 1.4142 as you'll get....
    Last edited by scaryjim; 22-01-2016 at 01:57 PM.

  7. #23
    DDY
    DDY is online now
    Senior Member DDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,838
    Thanks
    184
    Thanked
    624 times in 432 posts
    • DDY's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z390M Pro 4
      • CPU:
      • i5 9600k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (2x16GB) 3600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Adata SX8200 NVME 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 5700
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 550W
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2715H

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    The 3:2 display on the Surface Pro 4 is quite nice.

    While I'm not a fan of 16:9, it's ok on large high res displays, good for two window action.

  8. #24
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: When did monitors (1440p) get so expensive?

    Quote Originally Posted by PorcupineTime View Post
    Wassogood about 16:10? I thought everything was sort of 4:3 ratios 'cause that's what Tele is in and that's what your eyes are meant to see like. Is 16:10 super bettererer?
    I still use a 1920x1200 24 inch monitor. It's nice to have slightly more vertical space if you use your computer for anything other than movies. I mean its a bit silly to have 16:9 computer monitors since most of the usage is absolutely nothing to do with movies. I can understand having 16:9 TVs but computers have many other purposes!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •