Context of the thread .... politicians.
I'm aware of dictionary definitions, which vary, but the broad thrust is as per Chambers ...
1 a false statement made with the intention of deceiving.
2 anything misleading; a fraud.
So .... obviously, an outright falsehood is a lie. If I'm selling you a hard drive and I tell you it's a 1TB drive when I know full well it's 500MB, its a lie. If I tell you I drive a red car because I don't want you to know it's really green, then it's a lie.
But what about more subtle deceptions?
1) If you say something knowing that the impression you give is false, is it a lie?
2) If you say something that is technically true,. knowing full well that the way you say it and the impression you give is deceiving, and is intended to be, is it a lie?
Suppose a bloke arrives home one late one night and staggers in smelling of beer and smoke, and the wife says "Where the hell have you been", and he says "Giving my girlfriend a good seeing to", and she says "Don't give me that rubbish, you've been in the pub with those reprobates you call friends haven't you" is that a lie?
And in that last case, what if he really was seeing his girlfriend and swallowed the beer and smoked a couple of fags to make it look like he'd been in the pub. He told the literal, stone cold truth, but set it up to deceive by not being believed. Is that a lie?
So ..... if our politicians tell us something that is true, but either by omission or by deliberately giving a false impression, is it a lie? And if they do it to get elected, how much of a mandate do they have for their program?
An example. I use a Labour "lie2 merely because they've been in power for 13 years. A claim they've parroted for that entire time is "we will not increase the standard or higher rate of income tax". Yet still, 13 years later, I come across a lot of people that think they promised not to increase income tax. They didn't. They didn't promise not to increase National Insurance either, and they didn't promise not to abolish the 10p band, and they didn't promise to increase personal allowances in line with inflation.
So ... if you set out to give the impression that you wont increase taxes on people's income, and succeed pretty well in doing that, is it a lie if that impression was deliberately false?
Expand that out to cover all the other very carefully worded promises politicians of ALL parties make, and what we have in a week is a choice of which bunch of serial liars to elect.
For instance, Labour claim the Tories will put up VAT (and they're probably right) because the Tories won't rule it out, but the inference is "they will and we won't". In fact, Labour (and LibDems) won't rule it out either.
One of my favourite political lies is "we have no plans to ....". All that means is that you might or will do it, but haven't planned it yet, perhaps because you want to be able to say "We have no plans".
I'm a great fan out the Anthony Jay and Jonathan Lynn "Yes Minister" school of interpreting politico-speak (and civil service speak for that matter). "Yes, Minister" ought to be required study material in politics/current affairs classes at school. At least then our kids would have some understanding of the political system.
Cynic? Moi?