http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/2012/...-loss-in-2011/
Should have gone Android!
http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/2012/...-loss-in-2011/
Should have gone Android!
You'd think with sums like that they could make a profit...Sales fell from £35.6 billion in 2010 to £32.4 billion last year, and decreased 21 per cent year-on-year to just over £8.39 billion million in Q4![]()
Oh Nokia, how has it come to this!
I remember a time when a new phone meant choosing which nokia model to buy,
and they did have very unique models:
![]()
Chrome & Firefox addons for BBC News
TiVo: still the best PVR 10 years later TivoCentral.co.uk Follow me @twitter
In fairness to em, its very easy to make a loss of ~10% no matter what size your company is! Hell when I've made a bad deal, taken a bad project I've been known to eclipse 10%!
What's impressive is they had a company that was so far ahead of the game just 10 years ago, and turned it in to such a quagmire.Why on earth go Andriod? They lost 900m, it would have been 1,150 without the money from Microsoft.
Its more that they are in transitory phase with nothing truely at the £500-600 range.
Given that andriod needs really quite high specs before its runable, but the quality of phones that do this already (Mightly impressed by the screen on my mates new nexus, just not the battery life!) I doubt they'd make waves there, given the likes of Samsung and HTC owning the top and, and all the heavy competition in the lower price range andriods.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
Yeah but the share price is a little more complex than the loss this year, its about Nokia loosing its brand, its ability to produce innovative products and everything that gives the company any kind of value.
http://www.google.co.uk/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:NOK
Its been falling a lot worse than that lately....
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
What you need to understand is that Nokia's loss is as a result of them cutting the value of some of their assets. The smartphone division, although down too, actually made a profit.
Thank goodness Nokia didn't go Android. We don't need yet another Android manufacturer. We already have an overwhelming glut of Android devices!
Yey! Reasoned thought!
The thing I find odd about Nokia's decission is they've not forced Microsoft to give them a whole bunch of devs to implement those features people expected from their higher end phones 2 years ago. I'm talking TV out (I'd hope HDMI) and the like.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
animus dave was pointing out that the report says they made 8.39 BILLION and then million so basically a crap crap crap load.
Its down to them being in the transition and i agree that if they went with android then they would be dead very quickly, there is no reason to go android... Android requires to much high end components to run effectively and with that comes terrible battery life, MS have an excellent system and the only major thing they're missing is a tremendous integration between different devices like Apple do with itunes etc.
So basically when MS release windows 8 this year i can see them making huge gains as everything will be syncing cross platform effortlessly. However MS still need to push the windows phone 7 out there because when i was looking for a new phone i couldnt get a wp7 contract, none! Only now have i seen the lumia and thats it, no other WP7 i found on contract and considering their hardware they're overpricedThey need to hit lower with contract prices, PAYG prices are bang on the money @ £150 - £250 for the things like LG optimus and samsungs version but stock is getting rare.
MS just need to push it generally and nokia need to release a couple more devices to make it a little different, i personally dont like the lumia its to squarish for my tastes (havent seen it in real life yet)
edit: Oh and if some company will FINALLY stop and think, hold on lets have a thicker phone ... they will probably get my new lot of money, pees me off with stupidly thin phones yet having a few MM would increase batterylife 2 fold. Motorola done this with the razer and id like that to be adopted by everyone
![]()
The thing I find odd, is what they found so hard about implementing such features.
For me, they have done a Kodak. Perhaps they have realised in time, who knows....I am sure the next 24-48 months will be crucial for them though and they had better have some products soon to make people go "ohh" and "ahh".
Main PC: Asus P8Z77 WS / 3570k @ 4.4GHz / 8GB Vengeance Black / 2x GTX 580 / Areca 1680 / X-Fi Titanium / Corsair: HX 850 / 600T / K60 / M60 / HS1A / 2x Dell 3007 / 2 x 256GB Samsung 830 (RAID0) / 2 x 128GB Kingston V100 (RAID0) / 240GB Corsair Force 3 (RAID0) / 4 x 1TB Sumsung F1 (RAID5) / Multi-boot: Win 8 x64 Pro, Win 7 x64 Ultimate, Ubuntu and OS X Lion
HTPC: GA-Z68A-D3-B3 / i5 @ 3.6GHz / 8GB XMS3 / GTX 570 / Tevii S480 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / PS50C6900 / 2 x 64GB SSD (RAID0) + 3 x 1.5TB / Win 7 x64 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB RAM / GTS 450 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
Server Setup: HP ML110 G5 / 8GB RAM / Areca 1210 RAID / 2 x 300GB (RAID1) / 2 x 250GB (RAID1) / 3 NICs / Windows Server 2008 R2
2 x ESX 5.1 Nodes: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 / AMD FX 6100 / 16GB XMS3 / 500W Mushkin Volta / 160GB SATA HDD / 5 NICs
NAS 1: HP Microserver N40L / 10GB RAM / 2 x 3TB + 80GB Intel SSD (Hybrid) + 2 x 1TB / 3Gbps || NAS 2: HP Microserver N40L / 10GB RAM / 2 x 3TB (RAID1) + 2 x 640GB (RAID1) + 80GB Intel SSD (Hybrid) / 3GBps || Network: TL-WR1043ND w/DD-WRT + Dell PowerConnect 5224
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)