Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

  1. 05-09-2014, 02:58 AM #1
    REDALiCE
    REDALiCE is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    How does AMD opengl compared to nvidia CUDA core for adobe software? AMD seems better for price/performance.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-09-2014, 08:10 AM #2
    kalniel
    kalniel is offline
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    Quote Originally Posted by REDALiCE View Post
    How does AMD opengl compared to nvidia CUDA core for adobe software? AMD seems better for price/performance.
    Which bit of adobe software and what task in particular?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-09-2014, 07:26 AM #3
    REDALiCE
    REDALiCE is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    Photoshop/Premiere.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 19-09-2014, 12:58 PM #4
    starkyller
    starkyller is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    116
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • starkyller's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5G41T-M LX
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Duo E4600
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB
      • Storage:
      • Seagate SHDD1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 630 2gb ddr3
      • PSU:
      • 500w
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG D2342

    Re: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    nVidia is better but way more expensive
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 19-09-2014, 01:07 PM #5
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    Adobe software is increasingly shifting over to OpenCL,and most of the current AMD cards ATM tend to have the edge for this(not sure about the GTX970 and GTX980 though).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 20-09-2014, 11:36 PM #6
    Protocol2511
    Protocol2511 is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: AMD or Nivida for Adobe?

    nivida if you can pick up a 2nd workstation card your on for a winner if this is your main use for photo editing.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules