Yeah Right, 160MPH...Whatever...

jon bda · 31-08-2003, 06:44 PM

Read THIS, what a muppet...love how he can quote all these power figures and times when his cars still in bits and the engines not finished...

J4MES · 31-08-2003, 07:39 PM

lmao - he's some sort of dreamer clearly

fraggie · 31-08-2003, 08:09 PM

hahahahahahahhahahaha

/edit pardon the spam, was just that fkin funny

Creature · 31-08-2003, 08:53 PM

lol what a tool

[GSV]Trig · 31-08-2003, 08:59 PM

lol, I like the guy that said hello just signed up to say your a tool

Forums always get that kinda thing during the school breaks, we had a few over at mig that didnt last long cos the mods over there are 'ard basts

Creature · 31-08-2003, 09:18 PM

i had to point out the obviouse to him

who is that in your avatar.. your girfriend ?? you ??
she's very pritty

Russ · 31-08-2003, 09:48 PM

i'd like to know how his 0-60 is better than a VTS's. Some twart speaking ****e again

jon bda · 31-08-2003, 11:37 PM

I can't see how the hell hes done it, the works Pug 106 Maxi only chucks out 210BHP (only, DUH!!!) and thats at 9200RPM...i'm suprised Peugeot ain't give him a job building their rallycars or something if he can 200BHP out of his in his garden shed...

[GSV]Trig · 01-09-2003, 12:09 AM

Without Turbo supercharger or NOS, that leaves carbs or throttle bodies....

Vimeous · 01-09-2003, 03:31 AM

Assuming he's not hoofing bs around....

He's claiming 200bhp per tonne on a 900kg car so we're talking 180bhp tops.
About the only 1.6 I can think of that gets moderately close is the old Honda Civic CRX 1.6i-16v VTEC which pushed out a solid 150bhp in standard trim. Technology should have moved on but I reckon he's more likely to get 180 at the crank and closer to 160 at the wheel. An engine builder will need to confirm if that's possible.

About the 106 MAXI. It may only show 210bhp but are you sure there are no air restrictors on that motor? Most classes of motor-sport, especially rallying, have air-restrictor rules to try and keep each class competitive. In GT racing unrestricted motors could easily put 100-200+ hp more.

Oh yeah one last note on engine size vs bhp. When the FIA performed one of its many changes to the engines rules in GT racing in the mid-seventies Porsche took up the challenge to beat them at their own game. The rules said 4.0ltrs or 1.5ltr Turbo (simplified for our purposes here). Porsche as you can imagine went the way of the turbo and produced the 935 Moby-Dick (whale tail doncha know) armed with a full 450bhp motor. It won unsurprisingly and that was almost 30 years ago!
Now if only I could fit that under the bonnet of my motor........

**Agent** · 01-09-2003, 03:43 AM

Yes the dark destroyer of all will be returning to the streets of Ashford within the next coiuple of weeks

ohhhhh scareeeeey

Comedy Genius

Big RICHARD · 01-09-2003, 09:56 AM

The Clio V6..... its no faster than the 172 and i eat them for breakfast... they have no chance mate......

Look there is no way that your gonna beat me... give up trying in your clio!!!

Yeah!

Clio 2.0 16v - 172 bhp
Clio 3.0 v6 - 230 bhp

Yeah, he can beat a rear wheel drive mid engined 3.0 v6 RENAULT in his peugeot! BOLLOX!

**Lowe** · 01-09-2003, 10:12 AM

Yup, we noticed this thead over at the RSC and several of our lads signed up just to call him a c*** nugget. Superb.

TiG · 01-09-2003, 10:28 AM

Hope you realise the kids probably only 13 and can't even drive yet

Funny to see how he thinks forums are iRC, go on have a guess how much BHP its got go on

And if he did have a powerful car he'd probably kill himself within a week....

TiG

[GSV]Trig · 01-09-2003, 10:42 AM

Originally posted by Lowe
c*** nugget. Superb.

Classic use of insult there...

jon bda · 01-09-2003, 10:53 AM

Originally posted by Lowe
c*** nugget

/me makes note of insult to use at a later date...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)