![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| HEXUS.beans all stories come true in the end… see what’s sprouting, and discuss here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Does the story not slightly contradict http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31009 ?
Synergy6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Crazy HEXUS.net
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Void.. Floating
Posts: 10,417
Thanks: 27
Thanked 60 Times in 48 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Synergy6
not really, the story was posted before the new linux driver was available..
Originally Posted by silent ben
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
More l33t than dangel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /dev/urandom
Posts: 13,337
Thanks: 27
Thanked 252 Times in 199 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Synergy6
lovely article by The Inq - "accidentally" missing the 6 month delay from x1800 release to these drivers, and the laughable performance defecit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
They didn't say the drivers come soon after the x1800 release, they just state "supports all the modern graphic cards including X1900, X1800 cards and the older ones too". Which, as far as I can see, is true, x1800 being 6 months old notwithstanding.
Synergy6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
More l33t than dangel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /dev/urandom
Posts: 13,337
Thanks: 27
Thanked 252 Times in 199 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Synergy6
it's true, but the article talks as if ati have managed something special here. the reason for their 6 month delay isn't to add any new GL support (as needed for modern X servers like XGL), nor to sort out the performance gap - it's because they really don't care
oh my goodness! support for xfree86 4.1? the 4.1 released in june 2001? honestly, is that even worth mentionning, since it's been supported by ati's drivers since they first started releasing them? note also no mention of XOrg 6.9/7.0, which are what modern distributions use, as released just before Christmas (these actually work if you ignore ati's supposedly wonderful installer & copy files to the right places rather than ati's wrong places) fuad should be ashamed of himself, this is no better than telling people "pentium 4 has the highest clock speeds on the market, take THAT amd!" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Device Drivers for Linux... | bsodmike | Software and web development | 2 | 22-10-2005 11:02 PM |
| We heard your feedback on Newegg.... | DR | General discussion | 33 | 05-03-2005 07:13 PM |
| New Radeon Omega Drivers v2.5.76 ready! | novajoe | Graphics cards and Monitors | 22 | 26-09-2004 12:26 AM |
| Best drivers for Radeon 9800 Pro (no overclocking)? | Paul Adams | Graphics cards and Monitors | 2 | 06-04-2004 07:46 PM |
| Radeon 8500 linux driver install problems | Dorza | Operating systems & applications | 0 | 22-09-2003 11:00 AM |