• HEXUS
  • HEXUS.tv
  • channel
  • gaming
  • lifestyle
  • trust
  • community
  • ESReality
  • HEXUS.community discussion forums

    Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    Go Back   HEXUS.community discussion forums > HEXUS.help - buying advice & technical queries > HEXUS.hardware

    HEXUS.hardware Discuss everything hardware. Need to chat tech stuff or want to tell us about the stuff in your rig? Here’s your best bet! Add RSS Feed

    Reply
     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
    Old 27-07-2007, 11:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
    Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 160
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    graysky's system
    Q6600 owners... what is your VID?

    If you own a Q6600, please reply with your VID and the stepping of your chip. The VID can be found using coretemp. If you're using vista, coretemp will not display the stepping in some cases, so you can use CPU-Z (it's listed under "revision") to get the stepping.

    Here is a shot of mine for reference:


    If all else fails, look on the box your q6600 came in; the last 5 letters after the Q6600 in the production code will tell you the stepping. "SLACR" means it's a G0 while "SL9UM" means it's an older B3. Here an example shot taken by XtremeTiramisu to give you an idea:


    So, I have a B3 w/ a VID of 1.2875v

    EDIT: Here are the data as of 23-Sep-2007 at 7:30 AM based on people's replies to my VID thread here and elsewhere; just as a reminder, please do not post your VID from here on out as I won't be updating the data sets:


    *Histograms generated with SBHisto

    Total replies: 208
    102 replies so far for B3 stepping Q6600s:
    (VID: # of replies)
    1.1625: 3
    1.2125: 1
    1.2250: 1
    1.2375: 1
    1.2500: 5
    1.2625: 2
    1.2750: 13
    1.2800: 1
    1.2850: 1
    1.2875: 12
    1.3000: 14
    1.3100: 1
    1.3125: 15
    1.3200: 1
    1.3250: 31

    158 replies so far for G0 stepping Q6600s:
    (VID: # of replies)
    1.1125: 1
    1.1520: 1
    1.1625: 5
    1.2000: 5
    1.2125: 9
    1.2150: 1
    1.2200: 1
    1.2250: 8
    1.2375: 10
    1.2500: 16
    1.2525: 1
    1.2600: 1
    1.2625: 17
    1.2650: 1
    1.2700: 1
    1.2750: 25
    1.2850: 1
    1.2875: 23
    1.3000: 17
    1.3125: 10
    1.3250: 5

    http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!


    Last edited by graysky; 23-09-2007 at 12:07 PM..
    graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: West Wales
    Posts: 481
    Thanks: 30
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
    Phil_P's system
    Here's some vid data for you (vid can range from 1.10 to 1.3725v for Q6600 CPUs):

    Retail G0 steppings:

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...3&postcount=72

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=98

    And here's one at 1.2750v from the same batch as above:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...9&postcount=56

    vid = 1.2750v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=283

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=272

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=250

    And some recent B3 steppings:

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=261

    vid = 1.2750v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...2&postcount=62

    vid = 1.2875v
    Q6600 owners... what is your VID?

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=148

    Last edited by Phil_P; 28-07-2007 at 08:38 PM..
    Phil_P is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Posts: 685
    Thanks: 41
    Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
    According to Coretemp, mine is set to 1.2625V, B3 stepping.

    Cheers,
    Stephen

    Last edited by fat jez; 12-08-2007 at 10:09 AM..
    fat jez is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: West Wales
    Posts: 481
    Thanks: 30
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
    Phil_P's system
    Originally Posted by fat jez View Post
    According to Speedfan, mine is set to 1.18V.

    Cheers,
    Stephen
    You need to read it from CoreTemp. See the screenshot in the first post!

    VID is the default voltage of the chip - it's different on each chip.
    Phil_P is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Posts: 685
    Thanks: 41
    Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
    Originally Posted by Phil_P View Post
    You need to read it from CoreTemp. See the screenshot in the first post!
    I know, but as CoreTemp doesn't work with the 64-bit version of Vista, that was the next best thing.

    Cheers,
    Stephen
    fat jez is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
    Registered+
     
    Join Date: Jun 2007
    Location: Merseyside
    Posts: 69
    Thanks: 3
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Pyr0's system
    it works in vista 64 if u disable driver signing either temporarily (using F8 options at boot) or permanently:

    In Vista x64 find the cmd.exe (<vista drive>:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe), right click on it and select "Run as Administrator"

    In the box that opens type

    Code:
    bcdedit -set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
    
    Press enter and reboot...

    If needed, the entry can be easily removed with the command:
    Code:
    bcdedit -deletevalue loadoptions
    
    Pyr0 is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 08:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: West Wales
    Posts: 481
    Thanks: 30
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
    Phil_P's system
    Originally Posted by Phil_P View Post
    Here's some vid data for you (vid can range from 1.10 to 1.3725v for Q6600 CPUs):

    Retail G0 steppings:

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...3&postcount=72

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=98

    And here's one at 1.2750v from the same batch as above:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...9&postcount=56

    vid = 1.2750v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=283

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=272

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=250

    And some recent B3 steppings:

    vid = 1.2625v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=261

    vid = 1.2750v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...2&postcount=62

    vid = 1.2875v
    Q6600 owners... what is your VID?

    vid = 1.3125v
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=148
    ^^ There you are, in 10 minutes searching, I've found G0 (6 of) and recent B3 (4 of) steppings with exactly the same range of default vcores. Even the highest vcores are giving good overclocks. I don't see anything to differentiate G0 from the current B3's.
    Phil_P is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 09:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
    Has developed fish hoof.
     
    Clunk's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Clunk.org.uk
    Posts: 10,959
    Thanks: 351
    Thanked 680 Times in 433 Posts
    Clunk's system
    View Clunk's Twitter Profile
    Originally Posted by Phil_P View Post
    ^^ There you are, in 10 minutes searching, I've found G0 (6 of) and recent B3 (4 of) steppings with exactly the same range of default vcores. Even the highest vcores are giving good overclocks. I don't see anything to differentiate G0 from the current B3's.
    Not much point in doing all the work, its posted on a bazillion forums.

    Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    http://maps.google.com%2Fmaps%3Fhl%3...t%3Dh%26z%3D17
    Clunk is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 28-07-2007, 09:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Supershanks's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: Hamilton
    Posts: 1,120
    Thanks: 2
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
    Not much point in doing all the work, its posted on a bazillion forums.
    as usual

    Some people believe football is a matter of life and death,it is much, more important than that - Bil Shankly
    Supershanks is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 29-07-2007, 11:20 AM   #10 (permalink)
    Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 160
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    graysky's system
    @Clunk - of course I did... I wanna get as much data as I can. I have been compiling all the replies and will post it soon... I never did understand why that pisses you off.

    http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

    graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 29-07-2007, 12:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
    Registered+
     
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Posts: 34
    Thanks: 1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Can someone explain what the VID is?

    I'm guessing its the default input voltage for that specific CPU, and that the G0 steppings have a lower VID (and probably some of the later B3s), which should equal being able to push them higher?
    bwgames is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 29-07-2007, 12:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
    Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 160
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    graysky's system
    @bwgames - that's the theory at the moment. Several people with several g0 chips have found it to be true (i.e. all other factors are the same, the one w/ the lower VID ran at a higher o/c or at the same o/c as the other chip with the higher VID at a lower vcore).

    http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

    graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 29-07-2007, 05:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
    Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 160
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    graysky's system
    Just updated the first post of the thread with the data collected. Have a look!

    http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

    graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 29-07-2007, 05:51 PM   #14 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Supershanks's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: Hamilton
    Posts: 1,120
    Thanks: 2
    Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
    i.e. all other factors are the same, the one w/ the lower VID ran at a higher o/c or at the same o/c as the other chip with the higher VID at a lower vcore
    I'm not sure hat you are trying to prove. Collecting data with just the vid is akin to trainspotting you are unable with the data to prove any correlation to better/worse overclocking.

    There is nothing different or new in different vids, remember the same arguments been stated with the various amd 939 cpus some years ago.

    Some people believe football is a matter of life and death,it is much, more important than that - Bil Shankly
    Supershanks is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 06-08-2007, 07:26 PM   #15 (permalink)
    Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Posts: 160
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    graysky's system
    You may have a point SS. I don't quite know what to make of this whole lower VID = higher o/c potential thing. My chip for example, is a B3 stepping Q6600 w/ a reported VID of 1.2875V (coretemp), yet I can run 9x266 (stock) which is stable to 2x orthos for over 8 hours (I stopped it after 8 hours) @ 1.1375V in the BIOS which is 1.040V in CPU-Z under load. I can also run 9x327 @ 1.2275V in the BIOS or 1.208V in CPU-Z under load or a full 9x333 @ 1.2625V in the BIOS or 1.232 V in CPU-Z.

    My point is that all these vcore values are under the VID reported in coretemp. In my case, the VID reported in coretemp doesn't seem to mean anything given that I can run my system up to a 25 % o/c well under this voltage.

    Questions:

    -What does the coretemp VID mean if anything?
    -When comparing two identical stepping chips, does the one with the lower VID equate to anything meaningful?

    http://encoding.n3.net <--- for all your DVD and audio CD backup needs!

    graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 06-08-2007, 07:35 PM   #16 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: West Wales
    Posts: 481
    Thanks: 30
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
    Phil_P's system
    Originally Posted by graysky View Post
    Questions:

    -What does the coretemp VID mean if anything?
    -When comparing two identical stepping chips, does the one with the lower VID equate to anything meaningful?
    I may be wrong, so please feel free to disagree with me, but my interpretation of VID is simply the vcore Intel determined that chip to require in order to run stably at stock speed (commonly part of the binning process). It should certainly have a bearing on temps under stock conditions as higher vcore = more heat output. One would think it may provide some indication as to OCing potential too, but that also depends how accurately/aggressively Intel binned the chips.

    Trying to correlate VID to OC potential is probably impossible as everyone is running at different speeds with different vcore using different coolers on different motherboards. Not to mention the variation between chips as we see with yours above. Far too many variables to gain any useful info IMHO.

    To me, the range of VIDs of G0 and recent B3 steppings tells me there's not much difference between them. For example, your B3 stepping has a VID well within the range currently being seen on G0 steppings.
    Phil_P is offline   Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Breadcrumb
    Go Back   HEXUS.community discussion forums > HEXUS.help - buying advice & technical queries > HEXUS.hardware


    Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    E6850 or Q6600? vegettoxp HEXUS.hardware 19 20-07-2007 11:12 AM
    Which is faster, 9x333 or 8x375 on a q6600? Results inside graysky HEXUS.hardware 33 17-07-2007 10:54 AM
    PCI Vid card replacing Built In Zak33 Graphics cards and Monitors 3 14-01-2005 03:57 PM
    B0rked vid card? Platinum Graphics cards and Monitors 22 20-05-2004 12:17 PM
    Mini Clio vid ;) Lowe HEXUS.automotive - Cars & Bikes 17 08-09-2003 10:00 PM



    All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 PM.

    Any representations/statements made on the HEXUS.community discussion forums are the representations/statements of the author i.e. the person/organisation making them. If any such representations/statements are disputed they are a matter between the parties concerned.
    HEXUS Limited accepts no responsibility for any misrepresentations, inaccurate or false statements made by any person/organisation other than HEXUS Limited employees.
    For more information please read HEXUS Limited's terms, conditions and privacy policy.

    Hosted Exchange

    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
    Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
    © Copyright 2009 HEXUS® Limited. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction strictly prohibited.