![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
HEXUS.hardware Discuss everything hardware. Need to chat tech stuff or want to tell us about the stuff in your rig? Here’s your best bet! ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered+
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 95
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
noob RAM question 2G or 4GB
Which would give better performance (assumuming Vista64):
2x1GB 1200Mhz DDR2 (Kingston HyperX) 4x1GB 800Mhz (Corsair QuadX) 2x2GB 800Mhz (Corsair TwinX) The Kingston HyperX and the Corsair QuadX cost about the same. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 125
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
4GB is generally a must have for Vista 64, especially if its gonna be used for gaming or anything with lots of Ram usage, for 32 bit you could get away with 2GB (but then you'd only be able to use 3GB anyway).
The Kingston Ram won't be of much benefit unless you intend on OCing past 400MHz FSB as well (and even then is probably overkill, PC8500 (1066Mhz) would be plenty. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Teh king of cut & paste
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: People's Republic of 0iD
Posts: 8,042
Thanks: 263
Thanked 285 Times in 177 Posts
|
Vista x64... 4gb definately. It regularly uses up to 2gb when idling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
RIP Evy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: A wonderful avatar filled place
Posts: 554
Thanks: 32
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
I don't know what manner of hideous ways Vista finds to waste your resources, but there's no reason why a good OS shouldn't show such system resources as being in use when it has little to do - they'd be being used to cache data temporarily. Indeed it would be wasteful to do otherwise. Obviously when you have a more pressing need for the memory those caches would be discarded. But like I say, I've no idea what Vista is doing. Don't particularly want to know either
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 2,112
Thanks: 32
Thanked 85 Times in 74 Posts
|
Originally Posted by acrobat
It only uses 2gb because you have 4gb installed. If you had 2gb installed it would use about 1gb or less.
Both my vista machines use ~35% of their memory at idle. 1 machine has 1gb and the other has 2gb, so its relative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pasty Land
Posts: 1,512
Thanks: 85
Thanked 43 Times in 39 Posts
|
Ahh I wondered why 2 gig wasn't enough for Vista 64 when I was running it, right will have toget another 2 gig of Corsair then
Persoanlly I'd go with Corsair ram, it's always been kind to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
I'm constantly amazed that people complain about Vista actually using their RAM in an efficient manner. Would they prefer that their hard-earned went into some chips that just sat in the DIMM slots whistling and picking their arses?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,864
Thanks: 263
Thanked 179 Times in 158 Posts
|
I had 2gb when i first used 64bit Vista and things didnt go that well. Slow downs and lock ups mainly.
I put a further 2gb in (4x1gb) and all is great now. All the problems i used to have just disappeared. Luck or judgement??? I cant say. It does seem the way to go though. |
|
|
|
| Received thanks from: | acrobat (09-08-2007) |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Has developed fish hoof.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clunk.org.uk
Posts: 10,102
Thanks: 251
Thanked 438 Times in 298 Posts
|
I had 4GiB and 2Gib of it died, 2GiB is now working exactly the same as 4GiB did, and for everyday tasks, 2GiB is easily enough.
However, I still conclude that Vista is utter dog kack. For now at least. |
|
|
|
| Received thanks from: | acrobat (09-08-2007) |
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered+
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 95
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Looks like 4gb is the way to go - thanks.
![]() Is there much difference between 2x2gb and 4x1gb? Also for those running Vista64 have you had problems with software/drivers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered+
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hereford
Posts: 93
Thanks: 10
Thanked 19 Times in 8 Posts
|
4x1Gb seems to come with slightly tighter timings for the same money but having 2x2Gb would leave you with 2 free slots allowing you to extend the length of your e-Penis at some future date.
Apparently, "Do whatever the f*#! you like" should NOT be considered authorisation to build my uber rig!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
RIP Evy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: A wonderful avatar filled place
Posts: 554
Thanks: 32
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Toobad
Is there a faq on this? I'm guessing length corresponds to GiB ram & maybe GHz to width? Not sure about heat & noise output. Perhaps e-Penis should be made sticky?
Edit: Just noticed my post count means I'm no longer Registered+. How appropriate - people have been calling me that for years. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4gb ram, 32 bit vista ? | modd1uk | HEXUS.hardware | 9 | 10-05-2007 06:49 PM |
| Very simple question about RAM speeds and compatability | fray_bentos | HEXUS.hardware | 3 | 29-07-2006 11:47 AM |
| RAM Question | silentphoenix | General discussion | 3 | 26-10-2003 11:23 AM |