![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
| |||||||
HEXUS.hardware Discuss everything hardware. Need to chat tech stuff or want to tell us about the stuff in your rig? Here’s your best bet! ![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| new HD x264 video encoding benchmark Techarp is hosting a new HD x264 benchmark. Have a look and run it on your system to help populate the data table. Basically, you run the test encode of an HD sample (1280x720) and it will report back frames-per-second values for your machine @ it's clock/overclock level. You can run it at your stock settings and at your overclock settings to see how your machine compares to others in the database. My goal is to have a representative set of data for many different chips and chipsets. Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple. Thanks all and enjoy! The following image will be updated automatically as new data comes in. It doesn't display any results, but it does show the number of data points collected so far and how they break down by CPU type: Last edited by graysky; 18-03-2008 at 08:27 PM.. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: London
Posts: 7,105
Thanks: 257
Thanked 462 Times in 332 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark Sorry for the late reply... Not sure if you are interested in dated systems but here are my results ![]() ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 15.41 fps, 3902.58 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 15.50 fps, 3902.58 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 15.50 fps, 3902.58 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 15.50 fps, 3902.58 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 3.59 fps, 3936.11 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 3.59 fps, 3936.11 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 3.58 fps, 3936.11 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 3.59 fps, 3936.11 kb/s Using Win XP |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 395
Thanks: 70
Thanked 44 Times in 30 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 70.44 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 70.25 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 70.91 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 70.54 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.01 fps, 3952.85 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 19.99 fps, 3952.85 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.04 fps, 3952.85 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.00 fps, 3952.85 kb/s Vista home premium, p5k premium, q6600 @ 3.6ghz, 2gb ballistix pc2-8500, 7800gtx |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark @SiM - yeah man, older systems are cool to see. I was actually hoping someone with a pentium classic or ppro would do it. I used my old OLD p2-450 as you can see in the table. @RoBe - got it, thanks! |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| 4GHz 24/7 Club Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: London
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 413
Thanked 279 Times in 254 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark ============================== ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 61.45 fps, 3904.67 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 62.61 fps, 3904.67 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 62.44 fps, 3904.67 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 62.31 fps, 3904.67 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 16.88 fps, 3952.97 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 16.89 fps, 3952.97 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 16.88 fps, 3952.97 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 16.90 fps, 3952.97 kb/s =============================== ![]() ![]() ![]() <---- The Rest in My System The CPU is on speedstep so its 3ghz instead of 2. If I'm missing anything else let me know. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: London
Posts: 7,105
Thanks: 257
Thanked 462 Times in 332 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 19.81 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.28 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.25 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 20.24 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.12 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.12 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 5.13 fps, 3942.92 kb/s |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| 4GHz 24/7 Club Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: London
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 413
Thanked 279 Times in 254 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark Originally Posted by graysky Sure, its Windows XP SP2 and it's 32-bit of course
|
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Guaranteed To Contain Nut Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Maidenhead
Posts: 2,771
Thanks: 179
Thanked 79 Times in 76 Posts
| Re: new HD x264 video encoding benchmark This is the results for my MacBook Pro running Windows Vista Ultimate (32bit) using bootcamp. ---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.86 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.93 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 8.95 fps, 3905.08 kb/s ---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.22 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.23 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.22 fps, 3942.92 kb/s ---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG encoded 1442 frames, 2.23 fps, 3942.92 kb/s Seeing as i dont have a print screen button i guess i will have to type out all the relevant details ![]() processor model Socket P (478) C2D T7500 Your multiplier and FSB settings for the test 1596.1Mhz x 8.0 199.5 FSB 798.2 Rated FSB Your motherboard's chipset Manufacturer - Apple Inc Model - Mac-F4238BC8 PVT Chipset - Intel GM965 rev.C0 Southbridge - Intel 82801HBM (ICH8-ME) Memory Information 2048Mbytes DDR2 DRAM Frequency - 332.5 FSB RAM - 3:5Timings - 5 5 5 15 Dont these results seem unusually low to anyone else? |
| | |
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
| ||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| x264 video encoding benchmark | graysky | HEXUS.hardware | 89 | 24-02-2008 12:54 PM |
| Does an ATI card "assign" video quality when encoding a video in WMV? | Oobie- | Operating systems & applications | 8 | 05-07-2007 07:47 PM |
| Video Cable Basics | Alex | Audio/Visual - Standard and HD | 8 | 04-01-2007 04:18 PM |
| Help :) | Thanos | Help - technical & advisory | 15 | 03-01-2005 07:29 PM |
| Video Encoding | MurphmanL | HEXUS.hardware | 4 | 22-02-2004 02:33 AM |