![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
| |||||||
HEXUS.hardware Discuss everything hardware. Need to chat tech stuff or want to tell us about the stuff in your rig? Here’s your best bet! ![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Raid Now I'm a fan of backups, but I've always made backups of all my data just by copying and pasting to a different hard drive. However I thought that maybe using RAID 1 would be a better idea. I have a 250GB drive at the moment, and I was thinking of getting a second and running the two in RAID 1, so the disks are mirrored. I don't have a RAID controller on my motherboard, so I'd have to get a PCI RAID controller also. 1. Is RAID 1 a good backup strategy, or a waste of money, should I stick to the old copy and paste method? 2. Is it possible to run a seperate 120GB drive for my OS (Windows XP) and software, and have the RAID running as well for my data? 3. Are PCI RAID controllers any good? I'm not about to go and buy a new motherboard just for this. I'm really intrigued because not many people seem to run RAID in their PC's, it's mainly for datacentres, there must be a reason for this, and I don't want to just waste my money for the novelty of running RAID. Note that as this is only for data, performance is not an issue. Thanks in advance. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Administrator | HI there - I'll try and answer things one by one ![]()
RAID isn't a backup strategy at all - its just a way of providing some fault tolerance. Here an example , you buy 2 Hard drives and mirror them , so that if one fails then you have time to replace the drive. However , what if they both fail at once ( which if they were bought at the same time is pretty likely ) ![]() The level to which you take your backupos to depemds on the value of your data to you ![]() If its really critical stuff , then you might want to consider tape backup for the really important stuff , or burning a regular DVD ( use good quality DVD's ) or perhaps a removable drive you can keep somewhewre else ( then you are covered in the event of burglary )
![]() I hope this answers your questions as for running Servers in an Enterprise environement where uptime is important , then a server not running RAID is a liability. A combination of hotswap drives and a good raid controller can reduce downtime significantly in the event of HD failure. You have to think of hard drive failure as a "when" , not an "if" |
| | |
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
| ||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PCI Raid 3 Controller - Worth the move? | GingerNinja.net | HEXUS.hardware | 9 | 12-09-2005 03:48 PM |
| Silicon Image 3114 RAID controller problems | Daneel | HEXUS.hardware | 4 | 01-09-2005 06:34 PM |
| Dead Shuttle XPC SB75G2 with Drives in RAID 0 Config | tedvz | Small form factor & portables | 3 | 08-03-2005 05:20 AM |
| To RAID or not to RAID? | GingerNinja.net | HEXUS.hardware | 15 | 27-09-2004 10:58 PM |
| Question about RAID - Help needed | novajoe | HEXUS.hardware | 6 | 29-08-2004 09:21 PM |