![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
HEXUS.net Latest! Latest! Get your fix on what’s happening in planet HEXUS and beyond ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
HEXUS webmaster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bristol
Posts: 11,403
Thanks: 18
Thanked 94 Times in 61 Posts
|
Tech Report play with insane resolutions
Imagine being asked by your readers to grab some 7800 GTX SLI benchmarks at 2048x1536. Sounds fair, given just how fast a pair of the little beggars can be. Still, when it requires you to purchase a new monitor, you know you're either dedicated, or slightly mad.
Luckily, the results of TR's tests lead to more than just a few charts and results. The 7800 GTX seemed to have an exceptional performance advantage over its other high-end brethren. Suspiciously so, in fact. In their quest for answers, TR discovered from ATi and then nVidia that the greatest reason for the performance differential is the size of the Hierarchical Z buffer. HiZ speeds up rendering by ignoring polygons that won't be displayed on screen. However, at uber-high resolutions, the entire frame won't fit into the HiZ buffer, so part of the frame will lack HiZ optimization... unless you're running a 7800 GTX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
¬_¬
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In your fridge, eating your cake
Posts: 1,473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Great stuff from Damage. I'm remiss at not being able to write something similar, but my best monitor stops at 1600x1200. Hurray for LCDs, but boo at being too poor to get myself a Dell 2405
OH NOES!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,029
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
I've had monitors capable of doing 2048x1536 for 4 years and several older games are playable at such resolutions, so this is nothing new to me really.
Now, if I could get a good refresh rate at such resolutions, I'd really be itching for a 7800GTX. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
From The Grave
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SE London
Posts: 8,155
Thanks: 94
Thanked 62 Times in 50 Posts
|
Yeah, but to display a 2048x1536 picture properly a CRT with a visible screen area of 21" (which I guess most 22" screens are) would need to have a dot pitch of less than .21mm. Do they exist?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Radeon X800, XL distribution costs revealed @ The Tech Report | Steve | HEXUS.net | 2 | 23-03-2005 09:52 AM |
| Soltek's SL-K890PRO-939 motherboard @ Tech Report | Steve | HEXUS.net | 0 | 14-03-2005 08:24 PM |
| DFI's LANParty UT NF4 Ultra-D motherboard @ Tech Report | Steve | HEXUS.net | 0 | 02-03-2005 04:24 PM |
| TXGF's ATI Ultimate LAN Party @ The Tech Report | Steve | HEXUS.net | 0 | 28-02-2005 10:01 PM |