LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksRead more.OCZ Everest-powered Octane SSDs hits the 1TB barrier.
Read more.OCZ Everest-powered Octane SSDs hits the 1TB barrier.
If only they were £100 each lol
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
dual core CPU? 512MB DRAM? So my hard drive can run Android now?
Shooty* (26-10-2011)
Why would they need this amount of processing power - or are OCZ busy trying to create a new combined cpu/memory/storage unit?The new disks are powered by a dual-core ARM CPU and include up to 512MB of DDR3 RAM.
Bet these are going to cost £1000+ - which is waaaaaaayyyyyyyy out of my price range.
Actually what I'd like is some kind of high-capacity but not necessarily high-IOPS drive - mainly to provide a very low power/no-noise storage device for a media streaming box. Oh, and given the low IOPS requirement it'd have to be cheap - say £200 for 500MB or better, (although obviously £100 for that 500MB would be preferable).
Dreaming aside, it's nice to see "consumer" SSD's hit the 1TB mark - didn't take them long did it?!
Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...
Probably something to do with all the compressing and uncompressing of files.Originally Posted by crossy
In that case why only 512MB of cache, surely given the price tags of these it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to have 1 or even 2 GB
Might be space related. Must be challenging to pack all of that into a 2.5" frame.
Ah yes - I'd missed out on the "High transactional performance - Optimized for 4K to 16K compressed files" bit in the article. Although it does seem a little strange - to me at least - to optimise a device to receive compressed data. I think this is something I'll have to do some research on.
That said, I'll also be looking up "End-to-end data protection (AES)" since I'm assuming that some kind of special controller would be needed.
Still be too expensive for me to afford though ...
Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SCAN.care@HEXUS
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
