Read more.It appears as though Android favours dual-core.
Read more.It appears as though Android favours dual-core.
Hmm, I can't help wondering how the Snapdragon S4 will compare to whatever chip that ships in the Galaxy S3. From what little I've seen so far, if the Asus padFone uses the S4 chip then perhaps it'll be quicker than the Exynos4-powered Galaxy S3.
Obviously I don't know, just making some (big?) leaps based on the scanty information out there (1 part fact to 9 parts rumour as far as the Galaxy S3 goes).
Coalition: a system of government that adds one intellect to another and gets a half-wit as a result
I want finger extensions ... then I can play this darned guitar properly!
Will it matter to 99.999999999% of owners though?
I've yet to find anything to tax my single-core phone....and I do things with it most users do not!
Main PC: Asus P8Z77 WS / 3570k @ 4.4GHz / 8GB Vengeance Black / 2x GTX 580 / Areca 1680 / X-Fi Titanium / Corsair: HX 850 / 600T / K60 / M60 / HS1A / 2x Dell 3007 / 2 x 256GB Samsung 830 (RAID0) / 2 x 128GB Kingston V100 (RAID0) / 240GB Corsair Force 3 (RAID0) / 4 x 1TB Sumsung F1 (RAID5) / Multi-boot: Win 8 x64 Pro, Win 7 x64 Ultimate, Ubuntu and OS X Lion
HTPC: GA-Z68A-D3-B3 / i5 @ 3.6GHz / 8GB XMS3 / GTX 570 / Tevii S480 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / PS50C6900 / 2 x 64GB SSD (RAID0) + 3 x 1.5TB / Win 7 x64 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB RAM / GTS 450 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
Server Setup: HP ML110 G5 / 8GB RAM / Areca 1210 RAID / 2 x 300GB (RAID1) / 2 x 250GB (RAID1) / 3 NICs / Windows Server 2008 R2
2 x ESX 5.1 Nodes: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 / AMD FX 6100 / 16GB XMS3 / 500W Mushkin Volta / 160GB SATA HDD / 5 NICs
NAS 1: HP Microserver N40L / 10GB RAM / 2 x 3TB + 80GB Intel SSD (Hybrid) + 2 x 1TB / 3Gbps || NAS 2: HP Microserver N40L / 10GB RAM / 2 x 3TB (RAID1) + 2 x 640GB (RAID1) + 80GB Intel SSD (Hybrid) / 3GBps || Network: TL-WR1043ND w/DD-WRT + Dell PowerConnect 5224
I believe the HTC One S will ship with the Snapdragon S4 in the UK. I am torn between getting the HTC One S and HTC One X.
I'd disagree with that. My X10 (1ghz snapdragon) was really struggling with some modern games. (It was also really struggling with lack of RAM) - Maybe your phone is a faster single core or you just do less with it than I do? All I know is since getting my galaxy note with a 1.4Ghz dual core (and 800Mb Ram) I wouldn't go back. Sure the actual benchmark speed doesn't matter but i'd still advocate a decent dual core chip is a really good idea in an android phone.
Agree with some of what you're saying, you definitely don't need a dual-core (or worse still, quad-core) to make a phone call, do a little light web-browsing or send a text.
We've got three devices here:
- 1GHz Snapdragon, 384MB RAM (Gingerbread - 2.3.4. I think)
- 1.4GHz Snapdragon, 512MB RAM (Gingerbread - 2.3.6)
- Tegra2 (so that's dual A9 cores@1GHz), 1GB RAM (ICS - 4.0.1)
Device #1 is noticeably slow if you've been running a lot of apps - sometimes the front page UI can take as long as 10 seconds to completely redraw. Latest edition of Angry Birds can bring this to a near standstill.
Device #2 (still single core, but 40% faster) IS noticeably quicker - no perceived lag even if there's a lot of apps been running. Some very slight degradation running my (totally unscientific) Angry Birds benchmark.
Device #3 (the dual core) no UI lag, even if Angry Birds has been run. Easily copes with a high app loading.
So given that experience, I'm insisting on a dual core device as there's nowt more annoying than bashing away on the menus and having to wait for the device to catch up. Do I need quad core? Probably not - but as "cheesemp" says more cores = better gaming device, (which is a slight issue for me seeing as I no longer have a Nintendo DS). My current short-list for this year's contract renewal is Galaxy S3, Galaxy S2, Galaxy Note and Asus padFone. (but if anyone's got any other suggestions then fire away). I wouldn't consider the HTC One X because I don't think I can live with the idea of a fixed battery and memory limitation at the moment.
YMMV of course!![]()
Last edited by crossy; 27-03-2012 at 12:04 PM. Reason: poor spelling
Coalition: a system of government that adds one intellect to another and gets a half-wit as a result
I want finger extensions ... then I can play this darned guitar properly!
I have been changing my mind every other day as to which I want. The size of the HTC One X is off putting, yet the screen is supposed to be brilliant. The One S is not NFC comptaible but that doesn't bother me too much, my only worry with the HTC One S is the 16gb internal memory. and lack of a SD Card slot. but i am still leaning toward the One S, today anyway lol
What these benchamrks don't show is a Tegra 3 HTC One X. Yes, the Prime has Tegra 3, but that is a different beast.
I'd like to see like-for-like benchamrks.
Perhaps Hexus could provide us with their own testsCheers guys
Oh, I also think the screen size is excellent. I would actually rather have the screen size of the Samsung Galaxy Note (5.3"). With a Tegra 3. And Window Phone. But alas, not yet.
Last edited by Lord Midas; 28-03-2012 at 11:51 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)