Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18,670
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    352 times in 189 posts

    News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    Low power VIRTUS chipset can transfer an 8Gb DVD in 30 seconds.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    Good, Bluetooth is far too slow in this day and age.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    503
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    25 times in 20 posts
    • cameronlite's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P5K Premium
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair 1333mhz
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Corsair Force 3 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Twin Frozr AMD 5850 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XILENCE 600W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li P50r AMD Limited Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8 Professional 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer 243W 24", HP LA2405 24", Dell 2405 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin - 30Mb

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    I can't remember the last time I used bluetooth - it was always just to fiddly.

    Oh and the Hexus team might want to remove the last line in the article.
    Currently studying: Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Southampton.

  4. #4
    Seriously casual gamer KeyboardDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,241
    Thanks
    240
    Thanked
    109 times in 100 posts
    • KeyboardDemon's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabretooth Z77
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k + NZXT Havik 140 HSF
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Corsair Vengence Red (1866mhz) - (Because it looks good in a black mobo)
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung 840 Series SSD + 2x 500Gb Seagate HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD6990 (2x2gb)
      • PSU:
      • OCZ Fatality 750watt
      • Case:
      • Silverstone RV03
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x LG E2350 23" LCD
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity (40mbs dl/10mbs ul)

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    I found that the time it would take to get two devices paired and then happily talking together before you could start transferring say a jpg from one to the other was far greater than the time it took to email the file, so that's what I tend to do. I can't even remember the last time I activated my Bluetooth.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    275
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    23 times in 20 posts
    • Roobubba's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P55 GD60
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 860 @ 3.58GHz (Megahalems + Apache)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Patriot Viper DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 80GB Intel X25-M + bunch of HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI 5870 + Earplugs.
      • PSU:
      • TAGAN 800W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li V1110 (bit disappointing)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" LCD (TN)
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20MBit

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    I use bluetooth in the car for hands-free and occasionally music streaming to the car stereo, but it's just hopeless for transferring files. This definitely comes as welcome news!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    Now we're talinkg. Yeah! Bluetooth was never good for other than streaming low bitrate data. File transfers were just unrealistic.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Spalding
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    • mtyson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G31M-ES2L
      • CPU:
      • Pentium E6300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Storage:
      • Seagate 750GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon X1600 Pro
      • PSU:
      • came with case
      • Case:
      • old HP Pavilion Celeron case
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L2010P 1600x1200
      • Internet:
      • 4.5 Mb PlusNet

    Thumbs up Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    cameronlite, thanks for the alert!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Hicks12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Plymouth-SouthWest
    Posts
    6,309
    Thanks
    1,024
    Thanked
    288 times in 255 posts
    • Hicks12's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500k@4ghz, cooled by EK Supreme HF
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston hyperX ddr3 PC3-12800 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 64GB M4/128GB M4 / WD 640GB AAKS / 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit GTX460 @ 900Mhz Core
      • PSU:
      • 675W ThermalTake ThoughPower XT
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A70 with modded top for 360mm rad
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H IPS
      • Internet:
      • 10mb/s cable from virgin media

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    bluetooth works fine on my end , music streaming from my phone to my A/V receiver works without faults. However i agreee that anything more is terrible i.e file transfer, be nice to have something super fast .
    Quote Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
    Trust me, go into any local club and shout "I've got dual Nehalem Xeons" and all of the girls will practically collapse on the spot at the thought of your e-penis

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    184
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • BerZerk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5WDH Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 2x2 Gig PC8000
      • Storage:
      • Too much to mention
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD4890 1Gig
      • PSU:
      • Xclio 650W PSU
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • 8Meg ADSL

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    It will be nice, for wireless storage back up... This will kick Apple time machine back off...

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    About time there was a replacement, Bluetooth is getting long in the tooth. I only use Bluetooth in my car. If I have to do any wireless transferring then if possible I use WiFi. What with the advances in WiFi (802.11ac available sometime in 2012) it's nice to see this.

  11. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    5 times in 3 posts

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    As long as it's not as fiddly to setup as Bluetooth I'd be very happy to use it. Bluetooth's best days are definitely behind it.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    188
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodApollo View Post
    Good, Bluetooth is far too slow in this day and age.
    Not to mention that Sony receives license fees for every BT enabled device out there. I hope this new tech succeeds where zigbee failed but I doubt that will happen any time soon

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    This speed is quite useless ,which phone has 2Gb/s read and write speeds ?
    Not even the desktop computers with fastest HD's (SSD's excluded for obvious reasons) can match it , let alone the feeble phone or tablet.
    And this is not going to change anytime soon ...

  14. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • zaph0d's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Rampage II Extreme
      • CPU:
      • i7 920(c0) @ 3.8GHz HT Enabled
      • Memory:
      • 3x 2GB + 3x 4GB @ 1450MHz
      • Storage:
      • 5x200 GB Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD 6870 1GB @ 1050MHz
      • PSU:
      • 1200W (can't remember lol)
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li 18" Cube
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3x LG 37" 1080p tv's
      • Internet:
      • 17Mbit Sky

    Re: News - Bluetooth "replacement" is 1,000 times faster

    Quote Originally Posted by ser1 View Post
    This speed is quite useless ,which phone has 2Gb/s read and write speeds ?
    Not even the desktop computers with fastest HD's (SSD's excluded for obvious reasons) can match it , let alone the feeble phone or tablet.
    And this is not going to change anytime soon ...
    But then again - you could use that speed to send say video & audio data from one device to another, Cheap Wireless HDMI anyone?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •