Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18,649
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    350 times in 187 posts

    News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Capable of potentially replacing or working with GPS, in-building tracking could open doors.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Super Nerd
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,274
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    81 times in 56 posts
    • kingpotnoodle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2600K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz CL8
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Corsair m4 SSD & 1.5TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX-670 DirectCU-II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX 750W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone FT02B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Hazro HZ27WD
      • Internet:
      • Be ADSL2+ ~8Mb

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Simple ideas often very useful, sounds great for low-moderate granularity locating, can't see if being as accurate as pure GPS but definitely better than the nothing or the wildly inaccurate results from cell triangulation we have in dead spots now.

  3. #3
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,987
    Thanks
    960
    Thanked
    426 times in 369 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSi Z77 GD65
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb HyperX RAM
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256Gb + 1Tb Hitachi @ 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 7970 3Gb
      • PSU:
      • True Power 750w
      • Case:
      • Fractal R3
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Sounds a lot like Skyhook.
    http://www.skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Lordy it's BAE, means the government will probably just say yes please for a figure of 100 million and end up paying ten fold!

  5. #5
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    1,954
    Thanked
    2,832 times in 2,211 posts

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    I thought alternatives like GLONASS,Gallieo and Beidou already existed??


  6. #6
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,987
    Thanks
    960
    Thanked
    426 times in 369 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSi Z77 GD65
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb HyperX RAM
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256Gb + 1Tb Hitachi @ 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 7970 3Gb
      • PSU:
      • True Power 750w
      • Case:
      • Fractal R3
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    I've not heard of all of those but I assume that like GPS they're sateillite based ?
    This and Skyhook are more about mapping the electromagnetic 'map' based on GPS readings. Once mapped, a position can be calculated without any sateillites.
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Ir's not a replacement for GPS, nor is it satellite based. Basically, it uses GPS to get an initial position fix, the uses the relative motion of surrounding radio sources to track relative position (e.g if transmitter x is in front of you, then moves 90deg to the left, you have likely rotated 90deg to the right).

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,711
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    74 times in 58 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    I like how it uses GPS jammer signals to approximate your position
    Last edited by miniyazz; 01-07-2012 at 10:29 AM.

  9. #9
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,987
    Thanks
    960
    Thanked
    426 times in 369 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSi Z77 GD65
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb HyperX RAM
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256Gb + 1Tb Hitachi @ 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 7970 3Gb
      • PSU:
      • True Power 750w
      • Case:
      • Fractal R3
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Quote Originally Posted by edzieba View Post
    Ir's not a replacement for GPS, nor is it satellite based. Basically, it uses GPS to get an initial position fix, the uses the relative motion of surrounding radio sources to track relative position (e.g if transmitter x is in front of you, then moves 90deg to the left, you have likely rotated 90deg to the right).
    GPS is sateillite. Perhaps you should read what I said and the Skyhook link.
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - BAE Systems develops alternative to GPS

    Quote Originally Posted by Phage View Post
    GPS is sateillite. Perhaps you should read what I said and the Skyhook link.
    You obviously did not actually read my post:
    1) Skyhook does not use satellites for mapping. It derives an absolute position from comparing received signals to a database of known mobile phone masts and wifi hotspots.
    2) the BAE system derives a relative position from unknown local transmitters. It does not use satellite transmissions, as these are too faint and would change very little when moving.
    It can be given an initial absolute reference position, and this can be from GPS/Galileo/GLONASS positioning, a hand-input position, or simply from a 0,0,0;0°00:00 assumed reference.

    The interesting part of this system would be knowing how they discriminate fixed unknown transmitters from mobile transmitters on-the-fly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •