Read more.Paul Otellini says that improvements still need to be made.
Read more.Paul Otellini says that improvements still need to be made.
Good, someone who isnt being a little douche about it and simply saying it how it is, it isnt finished but it is at the stage to be released and MS are right on the money, since its so easy to update the system then I can see SP1 being released 3 - 4months down the line and it will be a massive one.
I am using Windows 8 Release (acquired through MSDNAA) on my HTPC and haven't come across any issues yet! The only problem is that my house mates do not know how to use the new UI!
i7 3770K 4.5GHz 1.2V | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | 16GB TeamGroup Elite 1600MHz | GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3 | EVGA GTX680 SC 1254/1500MHz | M4 256GB + 150GB Raptor | Corsair HX+ 850W | Antec 1200
i7 965 | 8GB OCZ Gold 1600MHz | GIGABYTE Extreme X58 | HD5450 | M4 64GB + 7TB | OCZ 500W
P9500 3.13GHz | 4GB 1000MHz DDR2 | Mobility HD4850 550/900MHz | 500GB
ik9000 (26-09-2012),j.o.s.h.1408 (05-10-2012)
The news headline 'Windows 8 launched before its ready' is not news. I think most software is generally released nowa days not 100% finished.
I remember Elite 2 on the PC, first game that I owned that had to be patched.
Oh it is - very much so. MS' agenda is to bring together tablet, desktop and phone and in the short term there are definite downsides to that. Longer term is a complete unknown (although some will tell you they absolutely know it seems obvious to me that without insight into MS' roadmap we can't possibly draw such a conclusion). The question is, are the current issues a blocker for you (as in absolutely) with no possible workaround? If yes, then avoid 8 - but at least try it for yourself (in released form) rather than relying on opinion (including mine), rumour and misinformation.
That said I agree with you - i'm pretty happy with it overall now.
I have a suspicion that MS is aiming for a much wider change - i.e. in how Windows is updated and released - and that we could see much more rapidity in updating it's feature set that the traditional 3 year cycle.
BTW seen this?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lor0j473gr...Pad%20Win8.jpg
I'll ask work to buy me one if it's real..
System 001: Asus Z68 Deluxe, 2600k i7, EK Supreme HF - Full Copper CPU Block, GTX 670 FTW 2GB x 2 SLI, EK 680 GPU Blocks/EK Bridge, 8GIG Corsair Vengence DDR3 RAM CL9 @ 1600mhz, Corsair HX1000, Dell U2412M, Logitech 5.1, Samsung F3 1TB x 2 (RAID 0), Samsung 830 128GB x 2 (RAID 0) SSD (System), Antec 1200 case, Thermochill 120.4 rad, Vario Pump, Windows 7 x64, Cyberpower 1500VA UPS[main]
System 002: A8 3850 APU, ASUS uATX FM1A75 MB, 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3, Corsair psu, OCZ Agility 3, 1TB F3, Dell 2001FP 20" LCD, £7's worth of 5.1 speakers (they rock) Windows 7 x64[wife/server]
System 003: AOpen 1557 GLSLaptop, ATI 9600 64mb, 1.5 GIG of DDR2700 memory, 60gig fujitsu HD 8mb cache, Intel Wireless and it's great! Windows 7 32bit [main lappy]
System 004: ASUS MB, Intel Core 2, 4 GIG Corsair, Silverstone HTPC case, stock cooler, GT220 1gbDDR3, Samsung F3 1TB, Kingston 40gb SSD, MCE Remote, Samsung 40" LCD (87BDX) via HDMI Windows 7 (32) [media centre]
System 005: Asus UL50AT Intel Core 2 Duo,4GB, Intel Gen 2 80GB SSD, Win 8 x64 [no justification]
System 006: HP Proliant N40L Microserver, 4x2TB drives, fan mod, Pico PSU mod, Win7 x86 [file server]
System 007: Dell Optiplex 9010, i7, 8gb, 128gb Samsung 830 x 2 (boot and VM drive), 1TB WD HDD, ATI something, Windows 8 x64 RTM [work]
No it doesn't. You are assuming that "most tested, reviewed and ready" means completely finished, all it means is that this release is better than previous ones. If you look back I'm sure you'll find that their previous releases had far more compatibility issues which indicates their OS releases are getting better just as they are claiming in that quote; of course Windows 8 is going to come with usability issues due to the new User Interface but as far as I could tell all my hardware worked properly with it still in beta stage which is more than I could say for XP or Vista.These notions fly in the face of Microsoft spokesman Mark Martin’s statement that “With over 16 million active preview participants, Windows 8 is the most tested, reviewed and ready operating system in Microsoft’s history”.
Both statements are correct and are not mutually exclusive as you make them seem.
Yeah they are far from being competent with computers, although they do either have degrees or are in their final year of study! It only took me a little while to find anything that had moved as the majority had remained the same. I feel it is much slower than Windows 7 that is on my desktop, the main factor being a 64GB vs 256GB M4 Crucial SSD in Sata 2.0 and Sata 3.0 ports respectively.
i7 3770K 4.5GHz 1.2V | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | 16GB TeamGroup Elite 1600MHz | GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3 | EVGA GTX680 SC 1254/1500MHz | M4 256GB + 150GB Raptor | Corsair HX+ 850W | Antec 1200
i7 965 | 8GB OCZ Gold 1600MHz | GIGABYTE Extreme X58 | HD5450 | M4 64GB + 7TB | OCZ 500W
P9500 3.13GHz | 4GB 1000MHz DDR2 | Mobility HD4850 550/900MHz | 500GB
I wouldn't want to exclusively use that - i'd use it in addition. As for trying it MS do provide a trial version - although it will expire:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/eval.../jj554510.aspx
System 001: Asus Z68 Deluxe, 2600k i7, EK Supreme HF - Full Copper CPU Block, GTX 670 FTW 2GB x 2 SLI, EK 680 GPU Blocks/EK Bridge, 8GIG Corsair Vengence DDR3 RAM CL9 @ 1600mhz, Corsair HX1000, Dell U2412M, Logitech 5.1, Samsung F3 1TB x 2 (RAID 0), Samsung 830 128GB x 2 (RAID 0) SSD (System), Antec 1200 case, Thermochill 120.4 rad, Vario Pump, Windows 7 x64, Cyberpower 1500VA UPS[main]
System 002: A8 3850 APU, ASUS uATX FM1A75 MB, 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3, Corsair psu, OCZ Agility 3, 1TB F3, Dell 2001FP 20" LCD, £7's worth of 5.1 speakers (they rock) Windows 7 x64[wife/server]
System 003: AOpen 1557 GLSLaptop, ATI 9600 64mb, 1.5 GIG of DDR2700 memory, 60gig fujitsu HD 8mb cache, Intel Wireless and it's great! Windows 7 32bit [main lappy]
System 004: ASUS MB, Intel Core 2, 4 GIG Corsair, Silverstone HTPC case, stock cooler, GT220 1gbDDR3, Samsung F3 1TB, Kingston 40gb SSD, MCE Remote, Samsung 40" LCD (87BDX) via HDMI Windows 7 (32) [media centre]
System 005: Asus UL50AT Intel Core 2 Duo,4GB, Intel Gen 2 80GB SSD, Win 8 x64 [no justification]
System 006: HP Proliant N40L Microserver, 4x2TB drives, fan mod, Pico PSU mod, Win7 x86 [file server]
System 007: Dell Optiplex 9010, i7, 8gb, 128gb Samsung 830 x 2 (boot and VM drive), 1TB WD HDD, ATI something, Windows 8 x64 RTM [work]
I'd be in favour of that - I really think it's a good idea actually but the truth is MS will sell the OS as OEM copies with PCs for the main. As for the legal side - I don't think there's anything there explicitly saying you can't use it (it's just that they're telling you who it's 'aimed at'). As they also say the majority of those two groups probably already have access the full version.
It is possible to install the full monty as a trial - if you hack the ISO slightly then you don't need a key to install it. AFAIK there is no working crack for it thusfar (which is surprising they've had long enough) and the only workaround is nicking someone's activation server (and I wouldn't want to submit my IP address to one).
System 001: Asus Z68 Deluxe, 2600k i7, EK Supreme HF - Full Copper CPU Block, GTX 670 FTW 2GB x 2 SLI, EK 680 GPU Blocks/EK Bridge, 8GIG Corsair Vengence DDR3 RAM CL9 @ 1600mhz, Corsair HX1000, Dell U2412M, Logitech 5.1, Samsung F3 1TB x 2 (RAID 0), Samsung 830 128GB x 2 (RAID 0) SSD (System), Antec 1200 case, Thermochill 120.4 rad, Vario Pump, Windows 7 x64, Cyberpower 1500VA UPS[main]
System 002: A8 3850 APU, ASUS uATX FM1A75 MB, 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3, Corsair psu, OCZ Agility 3, 1TB F3, Dell 2001FP 20" LCD, £7's worth of 5.1 speakers (they rock) Windows 7 x64[wife/server]
System 003: AOpen 1557 GLSLaptop, ATI 9600 64mb, 1.5 GIG of DDR2700 memory, 60gig fujitsu HD 8mb cache, Intel Wireless and it's great! Windows 7 32bit [main lappy]
System 004: ASUS MB, Intel Core 2, 4 GIG Corsair, Silverstone HTPC case, stock cooler, GT220 1gbDDR3, Samsung F3 1TB, Kingston 40gb SSD, MCE Remote, Samsung 40" LCD (87BDX) via HDMI Windows 7 (32) [media centre]
System 005: Asus UL50AT Intel Core 2 Duo,4GB, Intel Gen 2 80GB SSD, Win 8 x64 [no justification]
System 006: HP Proliant N40L Microserver, 4x2TB drives, fan mod, Pico PSU mod, Win7 x86 [file server]
System 007: Dell Optiplex 9010, i7, 8gb, 128gb Samsung 830 x 2 (boot and VM drive), 1TB WD HDD, ATI something, Windows 8 x64 RTM [work]
Biscuit (08-10-2012)
Personally I think Windows 7 is a really nice operating system and I just cannot see a reason to upgrade to Windows 8. As a developer I will have to use it at some point and test on it, but I don't plan to switch my home machines over.
I haven't seen one person so far who actually wants to upgrade to Windows 8. I know you could beg the question of 'everyone's afraid of something new', but from what I've seen, Windows 7 is perfectly adequate for now
I'm actually a bit excited about Win8 since I've heard that it consumes less memory and it's just leaner and more optimised regarding performance than Win7. The fact that you can just disable "metro" and use taskbar for pinning and starting your apps [like "quick launch"?] contributed a lot, too. Wading through that stupid start menu in Win7 just to start an app is completely ridiculous. Btw. I still use XP, so this can be considered quite a positive comment about Win8... I don't usually do that.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)