LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksRead more.This is the first time the feature has become available to the public.
Read more.This is the first time the feature has become available to the public.
and I expect twice the compression for 60fps uploads....
I recently watched some 4k stuff on youtube, compression artefacts everywhere making the 4k experience worse than bluray for about 75% of the video. I hate lossy compression
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Yeah they should really increase the bitrate. It's more important than 60fps imo.Originally Posted by shaithis
and I expect twice the compression for 60fps uploads....
I recently watched some 4k stuff on youtube, compression artefacts everywhere making the 4k experience worse than bluray for about 75% of the video. I hate lossy compression
My experience is filesize actually drops for a well tuned 60fps video vs 24fps (I use smoothvideoproject with movies), my best guess is x264 works better when there are more frames with smaller differences.
I hope this will also allow 50fps, most of the footage I film is 1080p 50fps progressive.
Cue use of videos for and against the dumb yet persistent "there is no difference" and "your eyes can't see the extra frames" argument. Yay!
Pointless! They still don't offer 5.1 surround sound support. Perhaps work on this first?
5.1 is more pointless than 60fps. There's more people that can watch 60fps than listen in 5.1.
Last edited by Primey0; 31-10-2014 at 12:42 AM.
Wow Google instantly makes chrome the only browser usable for 720p and 1080p youtube videos and another reason I wish there was an alternative to youtube with it's quantity of video.
Found out the hard way today that Firefox will not play 60fps in HD.
Watching videos in 480p has done nothing to convince me the increased load times/bandwidth is worth it.
I'm more annoyed that Youtube gave me no way to view the 60fps videos in HD @ 30fps instead, forcing me to use a paltry resolution. Not a good trade.
I will not switch browsers to use Google's proprietary tech; it's like forcing G+ on people again.
Life is like a hair on a toilet seat. Sooner or later you're bound to get pissed off!
Are you saying it'll never come? :S
Just honestly hope those people who think fps can be measured by human eyes can actually think for a change, and stop defending the degradation of film and video quality in the future.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote