Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 39

Thread: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

  1. #17
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    AFAIK they're MCM modules using the same die as the desktop Summit Ridge CPUs so it's not too surprising.

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Aberlour, NE Scotland
    Posts
    609
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    27 times in 26 posts
    • pastymuncher's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • i5 9600K @ 5Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Gskill Trident 3866mhz
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung 970 Evo Polaris+960GB Corsair MP510
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Inno3D GTX1070 iChill Air Boss X3
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 11 550w
      • Case:
      • Self built desk mod
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG Rev A04
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Nothing to be excited about really. With all the hype that they spout about upcoming products which turn out to be poor or mediocre when actually released, I shall wait until they are available and thoroughly reviewed before making judgement. We really do need them to be competitive again though. Intel has had things their own way for far too long which has driven the prices of their cpu's up to ridiculous levels.

  3. #19
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Sad that AM4 motherboards are not already out like a lot of people were expecting. I don't *need* Zen for some systems, I don't want to invest in old FM2+ boards any more and certainly not another AM3+.

  4. #20
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Yeah,Bristol Ridge for desktops seems to be nowhere to be seen and it makes me worried what the release schedule for the Zen APUs will be like - I would find it hard to believe AMD replacing Bristol Ridge so quickly on desktop.

    AMD Kaveri is over two years old currently.

  5. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Bristol Ridge - if priced appropriately - would me more than enough for the vast majority of desktops, including for PC gamers. In fact if my PC was a couple of years older and didn't have 32GB RAM I would probably have bought Bristol Ridge if it was out now with the intention to upgrade to Zen later next year.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  6. #22
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Bristol Ridge - if priced appropriately - would me more than enough for the vast majority of desktops, including for PC gamers. In fact if my PC was a couple of years older and didn't have 32GB RAM I would probably have bought Bristol Ridge if it was out now with the intention to upgrade to Zen later next year.
    I don't disagree with that,but even Intel has updated their IGPs with certain features which makes them look more attractive than what AMD has ATM. Kaveri has done reasonably well,but the issue is that instead of Skylake being compared to Bristol Ridge,if AMD delay too long it will be Kaby Lake instead!!

  7. #23
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Well I'm hopeful. Intel has held a virtual desktop monopoly for far too long now and they need a good competitive slap in the bake. The fact that they're architecturally competitive with Broadwell-E is promising. But we'll have to wait to see what comes out next year.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  8. #24
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    the issue is that instead of Skylake being compared to Bristol Ridge,if AMD delay too long it will be Kaby Lake instead!!
    Surely, given the core/thread count and Intel's past release schedules, it'll be compared to Skylake-E rather than Kaby Lake?

  9. #25
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagnaj97 View Post
    Surely, given the core/thread count and Intel's past release schedules, it'll be compared to Skylake-E rather than Kaby Lake?
    Emm,Bristol Ridge will be compared to Kaby Lake with its improved IGP instead of the current Skylake at the current rate.

    Broadwell-E has just been released so hopefully it will be Zen against that instead of Skylake-E.

  10. #26
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagnaj97 View Post
    Surely, given the core/thread count and Intel's past release schedules, it'll be compared to Skylake-E rather than Kaby Lake?
    Bristol ridge is the Excavator-based APU. The Zen CPU is known as Summit Ridge.

  11. #27
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    Bristol ridge is the Excavator-based APU. The Zen CPU is known as Summit Ridge.
    Ah yes, I was getting my ridges mixed up! Thankfully I'm not Klingon...

  12. #28
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Some more slides released:

    https://www.techpowerup.com/225248/a...pu-complex-ccx
    https://translate.google.co.uk/trans...tml&edit-text=



    So basically an 8C/16T chip is comprised of two CCX modules and the APU has one of those CCX modules replaced by a GPU.

  13. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Is the quad core APU a 4 or 8 thread chip?

  14. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    936
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    105 times in 72 posts
    • Jowsey's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock H81M-ITX
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1230V3
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair XMS3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Crucial MX100 & 2TB Seagate Barracuda
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 770 DCUII 2GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNova GS 550 watt
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Evolv ITX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 100Mb

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by jigger View Post
    Is the quad core APU a 4 or 8 thread chip?
    it'll be (up to) a 4 core, 8 thread CPU.

    If single threaded performance as close as what the Broadwell-E comparison makes it seem than this could be an APU with the same rough performance of an i7, with Polaris based GPU tech. That would be pretty amazing, IMO!

    I believe the next 6 months will be extremely exciting for CPU news!

    Come on Zen, we're all rooting for you!
    Steam - ReapedYou - Feel free to add me!!

  15. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Any news on the die sizes for Zen?

  16. #32
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: AMD provides a first glance at Zen Summit Ridge performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Jowsey View Post
    ... If single threaded performance as close as what the Broadwell-E comparison makes it seem than this could be an APU with the same rough performance of an i7, with Polaris based GPU tech. That would be pretty amazing, IMO! ...
    Single threaded performance is unlikely to surpass the desktop i7s from a couple of generations ago, mind you, and we don't know clock speeds yet, although an engineering sample running at 3GHz is, I guess, a reasonable sign. Add that to the rumoured 768-shader GPU and we're looking at an SoC (Zen designs all seem to include a southbridge) that performs like an Ivy Bridge i7 plus (based on ~ 80% of RX 460 performance) a GTX 750 Ti. Nothing astonishing for the desktop, mind you, but just imagine that in a laptop, taking advantage of the lower CPU overheads of DX12/Vulkan to push more of the TDP into the GPU...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •