Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

    If they launch alongside Cannonlake-EP we may have to wait until Q4 2018 to H1 2019.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

    FWIW, I believe that Intel would be kinder to its "fan club" if:

    (a) it recognized that the DMI 3.0 link has the exact same upstream bandwidth
    as a single M.2 NVMe port, and, therefore ...
    (b) it announced roadmap plans to expand that link to x8 or x16 PCIe 3.0 lanes;
    (c) it announced its intentions to do (b) when it implements PCe 4.0's 16 GHz clock;
    (d) it committed to future chipsets that support at least 4 integrated U.2 ports
    with full support for all modern RAID modes;
    (e) it demonstrated the leadership to build storage subsystems with variable transmission
    speeds, perhaps with pre-sets like 6G, 8G, 12G and 16G, with full Plug-and-Play compatibility;
    (f) it solicited customer opinions of proposals to populate 2.5" SSDs and SO-DIMMs with Optane;
    (g) if it can't build its own, then OEM an NVMe RAID controller like Highpoint's model 3840A;
    (h) if Optane is not meeting expectations, Intel has enough cash to acquire better solutions
    being developed by other manufacturers e.g. Everspin comes to mind (there are others);
    (i) instead of "locking in" their chosen NVRAM e.g. with proprietary solutions,
    a philosophy change would "open up" the Non-volatile ecosystem to exciting experimentation
    by DIYs, prosumers and enthusiasts, who originated CPU and DRAM "overclocking" years ago;
    (j) recognized that the world has now entered an Era in which mass storage
    is capable of operating at speeds comparable to DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600 DRAM:
    x16 lanes @ 8 GHz / 8.125 bits per byte = 15.75 GB per second!
    x16 lanes @ 16GHz / 8.125 bits per byte = 31.50 GB per second!!

    I could go on, but this latest news is a serious disappointment.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    520
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    31 times in 28 posts

    Re: Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

    Wow... wow... hang on a minute! If sales are steady and profit is acceptable then there's ZERO reason to release anything new. /s

  4. #4
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,704
    Thanks
    1,840
    Thanked
    1,434 times in 1,057 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

    Quote Originally Posted by excalibur1814 View Post
    Wow... wow... hang on a minute! If sales are steady and profit is acceptable then there's ZERO reason to release anything new. /s
    And there, right there, is why the current quasi-monopoly sucks bad. You've really got to hope Zen is worth the hype, but it won't be big enough to more than gently wet the side of the oil-tanker that is Intel right now.

  5. #5
    I'm special azrael-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    1,074
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked
    113 times in 92 posts
    • azrael-'s system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Prime X470-Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
      • Memory:
      • 64 GB ECC DDR4 2666 MHz (Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD)
      • Storage:
      • 1 TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 12 TB WD HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • eVGA GTX 1080 SC Gaming, 8 GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 560W
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 550D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB271HU
      • Internet:
      • VDSL 55/12 Mbit/s

    Re: Intel delays the introduction of 3D XPoint memory modules

    Charlie over at SemiAccurate has an interesting write up as to why XPoint gets less and less amazing (especially in Intel presentations) as time goes by.
    http://semiaccurate.com/2016/09/12/intels-xpoint-pretty-much-broken/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •