Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    25,968
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,394 times in 522 posts

    Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Low profile white card features a 16nm GP108-300 GPU says source site.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    177
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    11 times in 9 posts

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    These low-end cards need to be passively cooled (eg. HTPC use - NetFlix 4k for non-KabyLake) to be sensible choices. They're hardly appropriate for gaming, and with onboard graphics now so improved, it is difficult to imagine who the target market is. I suppose there's the DOTA/Rocket-whatsit crowd who don't need much oomph?

    The pricing is too high for my most common supply of "lower end" cards these day - replacing damage to onboard connectors etc. That audience doesn't want to pay more than about 30ukp. I guess the other audience is non-gaming AMD Ryzen customers (no onboard), but again, cheaper and passive would seem the right fit there too.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Quote Originally Posted by Irien View Post
    it is difficult to imagine who the target market is. I suppose there's the DOTA/Rocket-whatsit crowd who don't need much oomph?
    I think the target audience is absolutely dumb people or the people that have a mobo without onboard graphics output or cpus without embedded graphics.
    also possibly to those who are using them as display adapters on big ass screens or screen sets, but that would require more outputs on cards like the trident graphics cards.
    this is really not for gaming, GT series arent meant for gaming, they are low end, and dumbed down to the point where it's ridiculous to buy one.
    2GB of gddr5 with 64bit bus width is like trying to flush down the toilet after a taco night through a lighter sized hole.
    cant call this thing other than a desperate attempt to get rid of binned chips.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 3 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1070 AMP! EXTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Haha "What's your game?" is very fitting indeed.

    On further thought, this is probably something some retailers would bung into an office PC to make it look more attractive to the uninformed (I remember a friend of mine buying a PC way back when, it was advertised as a gaming machine and had a good CPU/RAM set up but came with a 7300LE or something similar)
    Last edited by EvilCycle; 02-05-2017 at 02:33 PM.

  5. #5
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    7,612
    Thanks
    288
    Thanked
    707 times in 611 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 660GB Linux, 500GB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 24 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Odd cards these. If they wanted good price/performance, then it should be 28nm as that still seem to be the budget sweet spot and it should have DDR4 rather than GDDR5 ram.

    As it is, I think this is for pre-built systems to get them a tick box filled saying "Nvidia discrete graphics".

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,086
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    50 times in 41 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Extreme 4
      • CPU:
      • Intel 3570k (4.5ghz) + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (4x4GB Crucial Tactical DDR3 1866mhz)
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 850 evo + 2x2TB Seagate 7200.14 in raid 0 with 64gb Crucial M4 Cache + 2TB Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 4Gb AMD 290x @ 1110/1500 (Asus Direct Cu II) x2 Crossfire
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2 and 55" UHD LG 3D
      • Internet:
      • Talk Talk!

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Going in the right direction, wan to get UHD out of my HTPC, not sure which will happen first a low profile passive card or a new APU at a reasonable price for the upgrade, not against replacing my A8-7600 but don't feel a need to.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    22 times in 18 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M5A97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-8320 @ 4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GiB Corsair Vengeance LP 1.35V 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 840 EVO 120GB SSD, 2x 3TB HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire (AMD) 6950 (with unlocked shaders)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CP-9020055-UK RM750
      • Case:
      • Nanoxia Deep Silence One
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-bit Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell WFP2407
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 (FTTC)

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    64-bit bus!

    *shudders*

    I was hoping we'd seen the death of everything under 128-bit.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    if it has legacy bios support i might buy it to just play csgo.

  9. #9
    I'm special azrael-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    695
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    54 times in 48 posts
    • azrael-'s system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8C-WS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1245v2 3.4 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB ECC DDR3 1333 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256 GB Samsung 830, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 6 TB WD HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970 TurboOC 4 GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 560W
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 550D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2209WA
      • Internet:
      • VDSL 55/12 Mbit/s

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Quote Originally Posted by Irien View Post
    These low-end cards need to be passively cooled (eg. HTPC use - NetFlix 4k for non-KabyLake) to be sensible choices. They're hardly appropriate for gaming, and with onboard graphics now so improved, it is difficult to imagine who the target market is. I suppose there's the DOTA/Rocket-whatsit crowd who don't need much oomph?

    The pricing is too high for my most common supply of "lower end" cards these day - replacing damage to onboard connectors etc. That audience doesn't want to pay more than about 30ukp. I guess the other audience is non-gaming AMD Ryzen customers (no onboard), but again, cheaper and passive would seem the right fit there too.
    I pretty much concur. These would make ideal HTPC cards if only they were passively cooled and cheaper. I can't see any other market for them, however. Too weak for gaming use while at the same time too powerful (and needlessly so) for office use.

  10. #10
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,001
    Thanks
    1,104
    Thanked
    2,001 times in 1,673 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    64-bit bus!

    *shudders*
    64-bit GDDR5 @ 6Gbps is ~50% more bandwidth than you could get out of a 128-bit GDDR3 bus. With the continuing improvements being made in colour compression bandwidth is actually becoming less critical, so a 64-bit GDDR5 card actually makes a lot of sense.

    With 384 shaders this should compare reasonably with the GTX 550 which most reviewers reckon is perfectly adequate for esports titles @ 1080p low settings. And lets remember that - like the RX 550 - this is probably a GPU that is primarily destined for laptops, being repurposed to fit a market segment that looked like it was dying. I suspect that's partly due to the Ryzen launch - no IGPs on AM4 platforms means every Ryzen PC needs a GPU - and if you're not that bothered about gaming your options last month were basically an Oland card from AMD or something ~ 7 years old. Now there's new architecture cards from both AMD and nvidia in the sub $100 market...

  11. #11
    Tangential CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    25,575
    Thanks
    2,819
    Thanked
    3,846 times in 2,983 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    It will be interesting to see how much power this will draw - I wonder if this would work in my Wesena ITX7 case with a 120W picoPSU.


    Go!Go! Gadget Underpants!

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    768
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked
    36 times in 33 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    It'll handily beat most APU's out there by a sizeable margin, the only things that'll come close are the iris pro intel chips that no-one has and some top-end AMD APU's. Problem is, at £80 you're just £10 off a 460 and £30 off a 1050 which will both run rings around it.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    850
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts

    Re: Details of KFA2 GeForce GT 1030 graphics card leak

    Elsewhere I have seen reports the GT 1030 is for Chinese market only... so maybe we need to wait for GT 1040 ??

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •