Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    25,990
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,395 times in 523 posts

    AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    AMD technical marketer Robert Hallock reveals that the update adds 26 new DRAM parameters.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    425
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    32 times in 22 posts

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Sweet, 4GHz RAM and PCIe ACS!

  3. #3
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,378
    Thanks
    1,356
    Thanked
    2,755 times in 2,239 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    I really want to know what the wartning is at the end of the blog. Sounds nasty.

  4. Received thanks from:

    DavidM (26-05-2017)

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    425
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    32 times in 22 posts

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    I really want to know what the wartning is at the end of the blog. Sounds nasty.
    Within the table it says:
    Added dividers for memory clocks up to DDR4-4000 without refclk adjustment. Please note that values greater than DDR4-2667 is overclocking. Your mileage may vary (as noted by our big overclocking warning at the end of this blog).
    Apparently anything more than DDR4-2667 is overclocking which is a little odd. If your RAM is rated at 4000 and your system has the physical option adjust it to that provided by the manufacturer I'm sure it can argued that it's a function provided as is. So therefore if your system were to break when setting that manufacturer provided setting and they didn't replace your goods I bet it could stand up in court.

    You don't provide a function that can damage your cooker that a user can easily use?

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,090
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    50 times in 41 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Extreme 4
      • CPU:
      • Intel 3570k (4.5ghz) + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (4x4GB Crucial Tactical DDR3 1866mhz)
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 850 evo + 2x2TB Seagate 7200.14 in raid 0 with 64gb Crucial M4 Cache + 2TB Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 4Gb AMD 290x @ 1110/1500 (Asus Direct Cu II) x2 Crossfire
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2 and 55" UHD LG 3D
      • Internet:
      • Talk Talk!

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Isn't it the usual to state the native speeds and higher speeds are overclocking, looking at Z270 boards they say the same.

    This is only good news, just hoping this leads to 64gb at 3000mhz being possible for my next build.

  7. #6
    BOFH Bagnaj97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    1,136
    Thanks
    379
    Thanked
    357 times in 208 posts
    • Bagnaj97's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus B150M-A
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-6700
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB DDR4 2133
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk Ultra II 480gb, Plextor M5S 256G SSD, 2x 2TB HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ OC 8GB
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale90+ 550w
      • Case:
      • Xigmatek Alfar
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu/Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC I2367Fh
      • Internet:
      • 71/18 MBps down/up Plus.net FTTC

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Within the table it says:


    Apparently anything more than DDR4-2667 is overclocking which is a little odd.
    The ram may be specced to run faster, but faster ram puts more stress on the memory controller in the CPU. The memory controller is only specced to run the ram at up to 2667.

  8. #7
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,378
    Thanks
    1,356
    Thanked
    2,755 times in 2,239 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    I really want to know what the wartning is at the end of the blog. Sounds nasty.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Within the table it says:


    Apparently anything more than DDR4-2667 is overclocking which is a little odd. If your RAM is rated at 4000 and your system has the physical option adjust it to that provided by the manufacturer I'm sure it can argued that it's a function provided as is. So therefore if your system were to break when setting that manufacturer provided setting and they didn't replace your goods I bet it could stand up in court.

    You don't provide a function that can damage your cooker that a user can easily use?
    I guess we're getting it, warts and all

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    768
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked
    36 times in 33 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    Guaranteed 2.7GHz pretty high for a memory controller - the 7700K only goes up to 2.4GHz

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,101
    Thanks
    963
    Thanked
    508 times in 395 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: AMD's AGESA v1.0.0.6 for overclocked RAM discussed

    It's normal to see this caveat. My board is an old P7H55. It goes up to 2200 but anything over 1333 is overclocking by raising bclk or the memory multiplier to get there. My CPU max official support is 1333, but the memory controller will happily do much more - as advertised in the mobo specs.

    eg I'm sat running 2133 rated RAM at 2160MHz without any tweak to the RAM voltage, just upping BCLK, vcore and the RAM multiplier. The native cpu bclk is 133MHz, I'm at 180MHz, for which I've had to up Vcore and IMC voltage to get it stable. The RAM defaults to 10x multiplier by preference, but the CPU integrated memory controller offers 6x,8x,10x,12x options. So 12x180 = 2160MHz. I could apply the offset adjustment to 0.495x instead of the default 0.5x per channel to make it 2133MHz, but the RAM is stable at 2160MHz so why bother?

    If you can run faster RAM by only adjusting the RAM multiplier eg mine would run at 12x133 = 1600MHz without any boost to BCLK or Vcore etc, then it wouldn't be overclocking the CPU, but if you have to up BCLK, Vcore or Vram then that is defined as overclocking the CPU/chipset.

    (NB even selecting XMP profiles for RAM would automatically adjust bclk and overclock the CPU to achieve this.)
    Last edited by ik9000; 27-05-2017 at 08:18 PM. Reason: extra info added

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •