Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18,681
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    356 times in 190 posts

    Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Is a Radeon HD 4870 with a 2GB frame-buffer good? We find out.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Lyall3s1's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q PRO
      • CPU:
      • Q9550 @ 3.93Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB G-Skill PC2-8500 @ 1111mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x Spinpoint F1 1TB Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Powercolor HD4870X2 @ 790/915
      • PSU:
      • Hi-Power 1300W Modular
      • Case:
      • NZXT Tempest
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" TFT

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Another card with a ridiculous ammount of memory?! Surely 1GB is more than enough.

  3. #3
    HEXUS.lost snootyjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    9,708
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked
    1,289 times in 1,025 posts
    • snootyjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Crucial M4 + 500GB Seagate Momentus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 570
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 * Dell U2212HM
      • Internet:
      • 60Mb Cable

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I'm actually surprised that you were so complimentary about the card. 2GB is just needless overkill - the only place where the memory is beneficial is when you go so over the top with the settings that the graphics processing can't cope anyway.

    Coincidentally as well, graphics processing that can cope really isn't far away in terms of the extra cash required for dual-GPU solutions.

    Desktop (3XS): 7 Ultimate, Silverstone FT03, Corsair AX650, Maximum IV Gene-Z, 2500K @ 4.5 GHz, 8GB RAM, GTX 570, 256GB Crucial M4, 500GB Seagate Momentus, 2*21.5" U2212HM, Creative T40
    Desktop 2 (Self-built): 7 Ultimate, CM RC-341, OCZ 400W XStream, GA-MA785GM-US2H, Phenom X4 9600 BE, 4GB RAM, 2TB HD204UI, 32GB OCZ Onyx SSD, Acer P206HLbm
    Laptop (HP Pavilion DM1): 7 Ultimate, SU2300 1.2 GHz, 2GB RAM, Kingston 64GB SSDNow V
    Server (Tranquil SQ-A5H): WHS, Atom 330, 2GB RAM, 3x2TB Internal, 2TB Backup
    Media Server (HP N36L): Openfiler, Athlon II 1.3GHz Dual-Core, 2GB RAM, 5x2TB F4 in RAID-6, 2x3TB Backup

  4. #4
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Alnwick, Northumberland
    Posts
    4,579
    Thanks
    168
    Thanked
    228 times in 203 posts
    • this_is_gav's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI DK X58-T3eH6
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 12GB Corsair 1333MHz C9
      • Storage:
      • 2xRaptor 150GB (RAID0 300GB), 2.5TB permanent storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GTX 560 Ti 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-series
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li A70B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • 8M ADSL24

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Aww, it wasn't tested on a 32-bit OS.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I find that 512 is more than enough for me at the moment

  6. #6
    Too old for this Sh!t Brewster0101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,116
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    44 times in 35 posts
    • Brewster0101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus m5a99x evo
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8350
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2x4) Corsair Vengence DDR3 1600mghz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F3 1GB and Crucial M4 128 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 6870 Twin Frozr III
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 22" 2ms - DVi
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb Bt

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by humax View Post
    I find that 512 is more than enough for me at the moment
    I have 512 too but my next card (likely 4870) will have 1gb, seems to be foolish not too.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brewster0101 View Post
    I have 512 too but my next card (likely 4870) will have 1gb, seems to be foolish not too.
    If i had the money i think thats what i would get to be honest

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Lozza81's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EX58-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 820 2.66ghz will over clock later as this is sitting under a Thermalright Ultra 120
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 1TB 32mb 7200rpm SATA2 & Maxtor 1TB external
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte ATI HD4870X2 2GB
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050W
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Spedo Advanced Package with 2 extra 120mm red LED fans
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samusng 22inch 226BW
      • Internet:
      • ADSL2 7mb downstream 1.3mb upstream

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Nice review hexus as always, but something which cried out at me was I think you should demonstrate how much more overclocking potential is in Sapphire's Vapor-X cooled HD4870 1GB or 2GB compared to reference cooling ones and also the Nvidia cards.

    If they overclock considerably more, does that not have a huge impact on their value and why perhaps some people might wish to buy one? i.e. it could be the most important thing to test for in the review and I didnt see a page on overclocking this particular card....did I miss something? Did you already overclock one earlier in the 512mb review?

    Like a lot of people here I frankly see no point in producing a 2GB 1 x GPU 4870 as they've done here. It appears Sapphire were looking for something to help differenate their ATI range and didn't fully do their homework. This is surprising when they are the same company who only a few months prior gave us the HD4850x2

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    492
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    34 times in 31 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Im sure with Stream and OpenCL this card can do wonders. Games are just not made to utilize 2GB of Vram *cough* consoles *cough*...well apart from GTA4.
    For gamer 1GB version is more than enough.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I like the design of the Vapor-X cards but 2GB isn't needed for a 4870 and the price will place it too close to the upcoming Radeon HD 4890.

  11. #11
    Shisha King
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    497
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    11 times in 7 posts
    • shaffaaf27's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600 Oced to 3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB Geil Black Dragon 1066MHz 2.1V C5 @ 1200MHz C5 2.2Vs
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 1TB F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Crossfire Sapphire 4870 512MB x2
      • PSU:
      • North-Q Black Magic 850W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG03B-F
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64bit Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • DGM 24", Dell 24" 16:9
      • Internet:
      • 20Mb

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    try gta?

  12. #12
    Too old for this Sh!t Brewster0101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,116
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    44 times in 35 posts
    • Brewster0101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus m5a99x evo
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8350
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2x4) Corsair Vengence DDR3 1600mghz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F3 1GB and Crucial M4 128 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 6870 Twin Frozr III
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 22" 2ms - DVi
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb Bt

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tidus View Post
    I like the design of the Vapor-X cards but 2GB isn't needed for a 4870 and the price will place it too close to the upcoming Radeon HD 4890.
    Is there any performance charts yet for the 4890 comparing it to a 4870 or 4850?

  13. #13
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    185 times in 110 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brewster0101 View Post
    Is there any performance charts yet for the 4890 comparing it to a 4870 or 4850?
    http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=17863

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 01:57 AM
  2. Reviews - Sapphire AMD (ATI) Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB: opening up a can of whoop-ass
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS Reviews and your right2reply
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 14-08-2008, 07:57 PM
  3. Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 TOXIC: better than reference
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS Reviews and your right2reply
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 04:37 PM
  4. Reviews - The Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 TOXIC
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31-07-2008, 12:11 PM
  5. Reviews - Force3D Radeon HD 4870: any different from the rest?
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS Reviews and your right2reply
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-07-2008, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •