Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 31

Thread: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18,809
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    374 times in 197 posts

    Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    What do you get when you cobble two Radeon HD 5800-class GPUs on to one board?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    S1L3NT danroyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    sussex
    Posts
    4,178
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked
    186 times in 153 posts
    • danroyle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z77 Mpower
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I5 3570K @ 4.62
      • Memory:
      • 2x4GB Geil Black Dragon 2133mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256GB +1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Msi 7950 Crossfire With NeXXXos Full cover blocks
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster silent pro gold 1200w Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 690 II Advanced Nvidia Edition
      • Operating System:
      • WINDOWS 8 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2713H 2560 x1440 Ips
      • Internet:
      • PLUSNET

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    god thats expensive.


  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Okay I was replying to someone else's post, but it doesn't appear when viewing the forum, only the article, perhaps I am using it incorrectly, heres what I wrote anyway...

    I gotta say, that having a review of an older game is actually quite useful - perhaps it is a bit specific to certain users though. From me it makes it easier from a comparison perspective, and realistically people do not upgrade on every iteration of a technology, therefore if I wanted to compare my 3870 x2 to the 5970, then having the benchmarks of Quake Wars is very useful!

  4. #4
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    9,728
    Thanks
    754
    Thanked
    791 times in 587 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Rampage II Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 3x2GB Corsiar PC3-10600C9
      • Storage:
      • 240GB OCZ Vertex 2E & 3x2TB WD Black (Raid5)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 460 SC 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-P50B
      • Operating System:
      • Gentoo Linux
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MK241
      • Internet:
      • 30mbps UPC Cable

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Maybe we should have benchmarks of Quake I while we're at it.

    Seriously, if it can run current games at above playable framerates at maximum settings, then obviously any older game is going to be overkill framerate.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  5. #5
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    29,199
    Thanks
    1,602
    Thanked
    1,429 times in 897 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-MA77T-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II 1045 X6
      • Memory:
      • 16gig Ripsaw DDR3 1600@1333
      • Storage:
      • Intel SSD, Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 6950 Twin Frozer II 2gig
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama ProLite E2201W & Benq 22"
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    very impressive power draw at "tick over" and even flat out... nVidia must be working very hard to equal that card.... they need to be anyway.

    It's a shame the X2 label has been dropped... it was one of the only parts of any graphics card lableing from any manufaturer that made any sense

    setoutyourstall.blogspot.co.uk

  6. #6
    Butter king GheeTsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The shire of berks
    Posts
    2,096
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked
    259 times in 162 posts
    • GheeTsar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16GHz
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 4GB DDR2 XMS2 Dominator PC2-8500C5
      • Storage:
      • Intel G2 X25-M SSD + WD Caviar Black 1TB + Samsung F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD 5870 OC (Powercolour PCS+)
      • PSU:
      • Tagan TG600-U33 600W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer 24" 120Hz GD245HQ
      • Internet:
      • Waitrose 8meg (lol)

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    I think the bang4buck scores are wrong.

    Is it really fair to use the HD5850 RRP as £200? ATI put the RRP up since launch, and very cheapest preorder/actual prices online are:

    Scan - £220 (preorder)
    Novatech - None for sale (PS five 5870s in stock for £385, wow what a bargain!)
    eBuyer - None for sale
    Dabs - None for sale

    And you should see some of the pre-order prices for the 5970!

  7. #7
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    5,084
    Thanks
    978
    Thanked
    439 times in 379 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSi Z77 GD65
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.5Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb HyperX RAM
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256Gb + 1Tb WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 7970 3Gb
      • PSU:
      • True Power 750w
      • Case:
      • Fractal R3
      • Operating System:
      • W8 64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    Maybe we should have benchmarks of Quake I while we're at it.

    Seriously, if it can run current games at above playable framerates at maximum settings, then obviously any older game is going to be overkill framerate.
    It's the software. QW was the last game under OpenGL.
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  8. #8
    "make it so" scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    9,271
    Thanks
    735
    Thanked
    1,158 times in 1,014 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X4 905e
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical VLP
      • Storage:
      • 750GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 7750 Low Profile
      • PSU:
      • FSP 250W TFX
      • Case:
      • AOpen H360b
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • IBM ThinkVision C220P (6735-60N) (22" CRT)

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by The Article
    Now, when NVIDIA's Fermi arrives on the scene, we're sure to see super-clocked HD 5970s, made possible by better yields at TSMC
    HD 5990, anyone

    Presumably, if they can stick 2 5870 GPUs (albeit underclocked) on a single PCB and charge £450, the profit margin on the single 5870 must be huge. I assume that means that, as soon as NVidia launches Fermi, the 5870 will magically drop to ~ £250, providing excellent value for money

    Quote Originally Posted by The Article
    We will see sub-$100 5000-series cards in a couple of months' time, codenamed Redwood and Cedar. They will likely replace the current Radeon HD 4600/4700/4830/4850 cards.
    In terms of launch day pricing, rather than current pricing, the 5750 / 5770 are pretty much direct replacements for the 4830 / 4850, with 512MB 5750s available for £90 now, and the 1GB 5770 @ £125, the same launch price as the 4850. I would imagine any replacement for the 4770 would be derived from this architecture (640shader 5730?) - the Redwood would be the replacement for 4670 and Cedar the replacement for 4550/4350 (this makes sense if the "die" pictures in the slide are meant to be at least vaguely proportional, as the 2 "new" dies are both significantly smaller than the 57x0 die...)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • borandi's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EX58-UD3R
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 920 D0 (2.66Ghz) @ 4.1Ghz
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill 3x1GB DDR3-1333Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung PB22-J 64GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2x5850 in CF
      • PSU:
      • 800W
      • Case:
      • Verre V770
      • Operating System:
      • Windoze XP Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19"WS
      • Internet:
      • 8MB/448kbps up

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Two please.

    ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶

  10. #10
    HEXUS.lost snootyjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    9,784
    Thanks
    500
    Thanked
    1,295 times in 1,031 posts
    • snootyjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Crucial M4 + 500GB Seagate Momentus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 570
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 * Dell U2212HM
      • Internet:
      • 60Mb Cable

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by Zak33 View Post
    very impressive power draw at "tick over" and even flat out... nVidia must be working very hard to equal that card.... they need to be anyway.

    It's a shame the X2 label has been dropped... it was one of the only parts of any graphics card lableing from any manufaturer that made any sense
    I still think that it was a good idea to drop the X2, at least it's plainly obvious to all that a 5950 is better than a 5870, whereas a 5850 X2 might look worse than a 5870.

    Desktop (3XS): 7 Ultimate, Silverstone FT03, Corsair AX650, Maximum IV Gene-Z, 2500K @ 4.5 GHz, 8GB RAM, GTX 570, 256GB Crucial M4, 500GB Seagate Momentus, 2*21.5" U2212HM, Creative T40
    Desktop 2 (Self-built): 7 Ultimate, CM RC-341, OCZ 400W XStream, GA-MA785GM-US2H, Phenom X4 9600 BE, 4GB RAM, 2TB HD204UI, 32GB OCZ Onyx SSD, Acer P206HLbm
    Laptop (HP Pavilion DM1): 7 Ultimate, SU2300 1.2 GHz, 2GB RAM, Kingston 64GB SSDNow V
    Server (Tranquil SQ-A5H): WHS, Atom 330, 2GB RAM, 3x2TB Internal, 2TB Backup
    Media Server (HP N36L): Openfiler, Athlon II 1.3GHz Dual-Core, 2GB RAM, 5x2TB F4 in RAID-6, 2x3TB Backup

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,724
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    75 times in 59 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Hmmm.. checking out those >100 fps benchmarks for the latest games, running at 2560x1600 at high quality settings.. is there actually any reason for ATI/NVIDIA to be bringing out shiny new graphics cards just for the sake of being faster than the last generation? I'm struggling to see a reason for buying it over the 5870, tbh. It's about features now, not grunt, IMO, when it comes to playing games at least - the older cards have enough grunt for everything on max. Apart from to run Crysis, of course

    /heretic

    ooh shiny

    Oh and 294W draw - PCI-e = 75W, 8-pin = 150W, 6-pin = 75W, Σ=300W. Not much overclocking headroom there, surely? Unless PCI-e power supply has increased, or that bit about SKUs means something that went over my head.

  12. #12
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,120
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    185 times in 110 posts

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by GheeTsar View Post
    I think the bang4buck scores are wrong.

    Is it really fair to use the HD5850 RRP as £200? ATI put the RRP up since launch, and very cheapest preorder/actual prices online are:

    Scan - £220 (preorder)
    Novatech - None for sale (PS five 5870s in stock for £385, wow what a bargain!)
    eBuyer - None for sale
    Dabs - None for sale

    And you should see some of the pre-order prices for the 5970!
    Thanks for that. Pricing is always a thorny issue, and Dabs has various AMD HD 5800-class cards listed at the quoted prices, albeit with stock in a few days' time.

    We'll be taking an average pricing of all in-stock at the end of today and updating the HEXUS.bang4buck accordingly.
    Last edited by PD HEXUS; 19-11-2009 at 07:33 PM.

  13. Received thanks from:

    GheeTsar (18-11-2009),PD HEXUS (19-11-2009)

  14. #13
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,120
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    185 times in 110 posts

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by miniyazz View Post
    Hmmm.. checking out those >100 fps benchmarks for the latest games, running at 2560x1600 at high quality settings.. is there actually any reason for ATI/NVIDIA to be bringing out shiny new graphics cards just for the sake of being faster than the last generation? I'm struggling to see a reason for buying it over the 5870, tbh. It's about features now, not grunt, IMO, when it comes to playing games at least - the older cards have enough grunt for everything on max. Apart from to run Crysis, of course

    /heretic

    ooh shiny

    Oh and 294W draw - PCI-e = 75W, 8-pin = 150W, 6-pin = 75W, Σ=300W. Not much overclocking headroom there, surely? Unless PCI-e power supply has increased, or that bit about SKUs means something that went over my head.

    Most PCI-Express 2.0 boards can provide more than 75W to the card, so there's room for more than 300W on a standard 6-pin and 8-pin layout.

    Also, the quotd TDP is an absolute worst-case scenario, and most users won't be able to hit those numbers with most games.

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    371
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    36 times in 35 posts

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    <snip> advert removed so my post not relevant
    Last edited by david@scan; 18-11-2009 at 12:41 PM.

  16. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    27 times in 23 posts
    • Syllopsium's system
      • Motherboard:
      • D975XBX2
      • CPU:
      • Q6700
      • Memory:
      • 8GB ECC DDR2 667
      • Storage:
      • 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GTX and 7600GT - four monitors
      • PSU:
      • 600W Seasonic S12
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker
      • Operating System:
      • Vista x64, OpenBSD
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 IBM C220p 22" CRT, one 17" VP730 TFT, one Zalman Trimon 19" 3D monitor
      • Internet:
      • 12Mb Be Internet

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarinder View Post
    Most PCI-Express 2.0 boards can provide more than 75W to the card, so there's room for more than 300W on a standard 6-pin and 8-pin layout.

    Also, the quotd TDP is an absolute worst-case scenario, and most users won't be able to hit those numbers with most games.
    Perhaps some PCI-e 2 boards can provide more than 75W, but it still needs to work in PCI-e 1.0 boards!

    PK

  17. #16
    HEXUS.lost snootyjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    9,784
    Thanks
    500
    Thanked
    1,295 times in 1,031 posts
    • snootyjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Crucial M4 + 500GB Seagate Momentus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 570
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 * Dell U2212HM
      • Internet:
      • 60Mb Cable

    Re: Reviews - AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

    Quote Originally Posted by david@scan View Post
    sobol - you need to check the rules regarding adverts on hexus
    And anybody responding probably needs their head checking...

    Desktop (3XS): 7 Ultimate, Silverstone FT03, Corsair AX650, Maximum IV Gene-Z, 2500K @ 4.5 GHz, 8GB RAM, GTX 570, 256GB Crucial M4, 500GB Seagate Momentus, 2*21.5" U2212HM, Creative T40
    Desktop 2 (Self-built): 7 Ultimate, CM RC-341, OCZ 400W XStream, GA-MA785GM-US2H, Phenom X4 9600 BE, 4GB RAM, 2TB HD204UI, 32GB OCZ Onyx SSD, Acer P206HLbm
    Laptop (HP Pavilion DM1): 7 Ultimate, SU2300 1.2 GHz, 2GB RAM, Kingston 64GB SSDNow V
    Server (Tranquil SQ-A5H): WHS, Atom 330, 2GB RAM, 3x2TB Internal, 2TB Backup
    Media Server (HP N36L): Openfiler, Athlon II 1.3GHz Dual-Core, 2GB RAM, 5x2TB F4 in RAID-6, 2x3TB Backup

  18. Received thanks from:

    shaffaaf27 (19-11-2009)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 13-10-2009, 10:57 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-03-2008, 02:35 PM
  3. Reviews - ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 - AMD's back
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28-01-2008, 04:33 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-01-2008, 05:31 PM
  5. HEXUS.net - reviews :: AMD Radeon HD 2600 XT and Radeon HD 2400 XT
    By Steve in forum HEXUS Reviews and your right2reply
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-08-2007, 10:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •