Read more.Is a 2,560x1,080-pixel resolution right for you?
Read more.Is a 2,560x1,080-pixel resolution right for you?
Now, get 3 of these. That'll be true surround gaming.
I was wondering about the screen coating. It looks like a matt finish but is it aggresive or light?
I dont like the egg shell effect on heavily aggresive screen coatings.
`The stand, which takes but a moment to attach, enables the monitor to be pivoted into portrait mode - though we're not sure why you would want to`
`Problems can arise when viewing web pages, as most websites aren't optimised in spanning to ever-wider displays. HEXUS runs a standard 1,920x1,080-resolution width, and you can see the extra unused space on either side of the Radeon site skin.`
Hellooo?
Answered your own question- try browsing in portrait mode, you won`t go back, I promise you.
Lol.
I'd much rather a 2560x1600 (16:10 FTW), 120Hz display with 'amateur-photographer grade' colour reproduction and as low input time as possible.
I have the money saved up, and I'm waiting for someone to make a monitor that I want to buy. This is completely the wrong direction as far as I'm concerned.
Do games suffer from a fisheye lens effect with this monitor? You can expand your FOV, but i'm guessing it'll curve a bit to the left & right. You can angle the left and right monitors in a triple screen setup to avoid this effect.
I still prefer 3 monitor than this. but yeah if you're rich and you can set up multi-monitor with this. im not sure how it will look considering the screen ratio / reso.
Looking the business with a super-slim design and outputting a high-quality picture in all regards, the £415 Philips is ideally suited to readers who want more screen real estate without having the encumbrance of an intervening bezel between two cheaper monitors situated side by side. The superwidescreen viewing works particularly well for gaming and watching aspect-correct movies, though our concern is that prices will be kept high due to a lack of volume production; it already seems as if 2,560x1,440 monitors are fast becoming the next de facto luxury screens.
oh sorry didn't read the whole conversation.
Make it 2560x1200 and I'd be interested but give me this 2560x1080 and, after putting a double height or triple height taskbar (yes, really, even with nine virtual desktops to play on, lol), that's one cramped workplace. I'll stick with three 1920x1200's thanks (one in portrait mode for the aforementioned "never go back" browsing ;-). Unless I'm tempted and get the budget to upgrade to 2560x1600 30"ers.
I'll leave this monitor to the gamers and other people whose eyes don't seem to go up and down. ;-P
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)