Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 20

Thread: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    25,272
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,365 times in 514 posts

    Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Let's settle the debate: can a Killer NIC really improve your network experience?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,221
    Thanks
    1,333
    Thanked
    2,703 times in 2,204 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Why wouldn't you just limit the Steam download speed while playing games? You don't need killer hardware or software to do that. Feels a bit artificial to test while allowing Steam to use all the bandwidth and then say another QoS software layer helped.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    605
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked
    63 times in 54 posts
    • Firejack's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 3
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4690k
      • Memory:
      • Samsung Green 1600Mhz 2x4GB
      • Storage:
      • 1x Crucial 250GB SSD, 1x WD 320GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 380 4GB Nitro
      • PSU:
      • SeaSonic G-450
      • Case:
      • Antec Super LANboy
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell ST2220M
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    The Killer Network Manager is too much of a resource hog to make it worthwhile. Whatever you gain in network performance you lose the same if not more in system performance.

    The experience with my E2200 has been terrible. I got an E2200 in 2014 on my motherboard and it was *never* stable under Windows 8.0 with frequent software crashes and driver resets. Only by accident I managed to get it working when I stumbled across a guide that allowed me to use the Qualcomm Atheros AR8161 drivers instead as both NICs were based on the same chip.

    Fast forward to Windows 10 and I didn't have a working E2200 driver until last September when the 8.1.0.31 drivers were released that fixed the driver resetting when copying large 100MB+ files across my network.

    Things have been slightly more positive since Rivet Networks came on the scene with more frequent driver updates but honestly, I wouldn't buy another Killer Networks product.

  4. #4
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Its also not really a hardware feature? QoS is a pretty basic networking option my motherboard drivers can do it (Asus Z97 MPower) as can my Router (also asus as it happens but any decent router should be able to). A proper comparison test would be 'Is QoS on a single machine better than at the exit point' I'd bet the answer would be no, except in the instance you start a big network copy job before opening up a game.

  5. #5
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    ...Why would anyone be watching a youtube video while playing a game?

  6. #6
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,187
    Thanks
    589
    Thanked
    1,538 times in 1,225 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    ...Why would anyone be watching a youtube video while playing a game?
    I used to watch TV whilst playing Football Manager. But then I guess that's not really the objective of Killer - that's more about online games. As for who is playing online games and watching YouTube... I'm not sure. Minecraft and slow-paced strategy games, maybe?

    Desktop (3XS): 10 Pro, Silverstone FT03, Corsair RM450, Maximus IV Gene-Z, 2500K @ 4.5 GHz, 8GB RAM, GTX 970, 1TB SSD, S2716DG & U2212HM
    Desktop 2 (Self-built): 7 Ultimate, CM RC-341, OCZ 400W XStream, GA-MA785GM-US2H, Phenom X4 9600 BE, 4GB RAM, 2TB HD204UI, 128GB Crucial M4, Acer P206HLbm
    Laptop (HP Pavilion DM1): 7 Ultimate, SU2300 1.2 GHz, 2GB RAM, Kingston 64GB SSDNow V
    Server (Self-built): Server 2013, Fractal Design R4, 580W be quiet! BN198, GA-F2A85X-D3H, AMD A8 5500, 16GB RAM, 120GB Samsung 840, 6*4TB Seagate

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    These products seem pointless, In my house Ive got 5 wired devices and many wireless devices running off my router + one switch. If one user was to decide to use all of the available bandwidth on the network, I can't see how the Killer NIC or their software being able make my connection to the network any better.

    I use Tomato firmware on my ASUS router which has excellent QOS rules to ensure traffic is prioritised correctly. PFsense is another good option to do QOS on your network.

    Perhaps they should scrap all of their products and focus on making a Killer NIC router instead where the QOS software would be more beneficial for the end user.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Hi - I am with Rivet Networks. My kids often watch Netflix and play games at the same time, but another scenario is watching a twitch stream while playing.

    The bigger picture though is what Parm mentioned - sometimes we stress our networks out intentionally by multitasking, and other times it happens without us knowing (windows updates, softpatches, etc...). Either way, our attitude is why waste expensive bandwidth by turning everything off when you game when you no longer have to? Games usually only take about 20 kilobits of data at any given point, and if you have a 100 megabit connection you are wasting over 99% of your bandwidth when you game.
    Last edited by Tarinder; 14-04-2016 at 02:01 PM.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    I suppose this one is similar to DX12 and Mantle right now. There is a promise of having low overhead drivers and down to the metal features, but results are not showing the advantages just yet. Similar to Killer NICs. So far, I am not impressed.
    However, it is good to see better 5GHz WiFi performance.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    14 times in 12 posts

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    ...Why would anyone be watching a youtube video while playing a game?
    I used to watch TV whilst playing Football Manager. But then I guess that's not really the objective of Killer - that's more about online games. As for who is playing online games and watching YouTube... I'm not sure. Minecraft and slow-paced strategy games, maybe?
    I often have iPlayer on 1 screen while bittorrent is in the background while playing WoW. NO killer network but perfectly fine

  11. #11
    Vive le pants! directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    16,903
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked
    983 times in 643 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X99A Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 5280k
      • Memory:
      • 32GiB ADATA DDR4
      • Storage:
      • Corsair Neutron XT 960GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G Twin Frozr 5
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX860i
      • Case:
      • NZXT H440
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 16.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2713HM
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    [QUOTE=Firejack;3633071The experience with my E2200 has been terrible.[/QUOTE]

    Mine's been great. Supported out of the box by the alx kernel module. JustWorks(tm)

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    605
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked
    63 times in 54 posts
    • Firejack's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 3
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4690k
      • Memory:
      • Samsung Green 1600Mhz 2x4GB
      • Storage:
      • 1x Crucial 250GB SSD, 1x WD 320GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 380 4GB Nitro
      • PSU:
      • SeaSonic G-450
      • Case:
      • Antec Super LANboy
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell ST2220M
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Unfortunately the E2200 is in my gaming machine so I'm stuck with Windows for the time being

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Wimborne
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    • dannyboy75's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GA-Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Ivy Bridge i7 3770
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 16Gb 1600MHz 9-9-9-24
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 SSD 500Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus R9 280X DirectCU II Top
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 600SXS
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster K280
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DGM 23" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • 4Mbps down/ 500Kbps up :(

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    ...Why would anyone be watching a youtube video while playing a game?
    I often play music from youtube while gaming. Also sometimes alt+tab out of games to browse youtube instead of staring at a loading screen, or when playing games such as Elite Dangerous, where supercruising to a destination can take a minute or two.

  14. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • maxp779's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock Extreme 3 Gen 3
      • CPU:
      • 2600k
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 500GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD5850
      • PSU:
      • Cooler Master Silent Pro M 600w
      • Case:
      • Antec 902
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic VX2260WM 22" 1080p
      • Internet:
      • 8MB

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    As a gamer I actively avoid Killer network stuff...

    Id take Intel or Reaktek or even Atheros over this BS. All 3 of those have worked well for me and are reliable. Killer? Never heard of it apart from that stupid PCI gaming network card that only morons bought back in the day. Give me a proven network chip anyday.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    So for the pleasure of installing a hulking great piece of network management software you get lower throughput than a bargain basement Realtek NIC? Let's just say Realtek NICs are used because they're cheap, not because they're particularly good (though they are adequate, mind you), and yet it still beat the Killer in most of the tests.

    I know, it's a small difference and over a gigabit link who really cares about a megabit here or a kilobit there, but I'd expect a product like this to provide best of breed performance rather than being shown up by the cheap as chips 'industry standard' network card for consumer boards.

    Also as it works at a single device level it's also absolutely no help for networks with multiple devices - yes it might throttle Windows updates on your gaming PC but it won't throttle someone else with a laptop/tablet/phone running updates or watching Netflix or whatever. If it's something that really causes a problem on a network then QoS is a much better 'whole network' solution for that.

    Overall - thanks but no thanks.

  16. #16
    Alien Symbiote Sumanji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked
    48 times in 30 posts
    • Sumanji's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
      • Memory:
      • 4GB OCZ Blade LV PC2-9200
      • Storage:
      • Crucial C300 64GB (System) WD Blue 1TB (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire NITRO R9 380 4GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 750W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180B (SPCR Edition)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM 29" LCD (2560 x 1080 @ 60Hz)
      • Internet:
      • TWC Extreme 30 / 5

    Re: Killer Ethernet E2400 and Wireless-AC 1535

    Quote Originally Posted by Mapester View Post
    If one user was to decide to use all of the available bandwidth on the network, I can't see how the Killer NIC or their software being able make my connection to the network any better.
    This.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •