Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    25,273
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,365 times in 514 posts

    HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Sleek, stylish and armed with B&O sound.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    24,765
    Thanks
    2,692
    Thanked
    3,751 times in 2,902 posts

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    For some reason I want one,despite the relatively anaemic specs for the price!!


    Go!Go! Gadget Underpants!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    15 times in 15 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    It's a cute little thing. One with a ryzen quad core APU would be really attractive

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    if i was in the market for a computer this size i would either go for the Intel Skull Canyon which is literally twice as fast and in the same price area and is semi upgradable or as the above poster says wait for the Ryzen Quad core APU.
    Literally the only advantage this has got is integrated (and pretty good) speakers.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Great system for those that only care about how it looks.

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Rubarb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H81m-E33
      • CPU:
      • G3258
      • Memory:
      • 8GB hyper x beast
      • Storage:
      • 120ssd, 2gb hdd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • msi gtx960 4gb
      • PSU:
      • seasonic 450w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake mozrt tx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 24'
      • Internet:
      • 100mb

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Quote Originally Posted by will19565 View Post
    if i was in the market for a computer this size i would either go for the Intel Skull Canyon which is literally twice as fast and in the same price area and is semi upgradable or as the above poster says wait for the Ryzen Quad core APU.
    Literally the only advantage this has got is integrated (and pretty good) speakers.
    Bingo ! and ditto what he said

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Norfolk (Nowhereland)
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • Ozaron's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z170 SLI Plus
      • CPU:
      • i5-6600K 4.2GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB HyperX Fury DDR4 @ 2700MHz
      • Storage:
      • Toshiba X300 4TB, WD Blue 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12-II 620w
      • Case:
      • In Win 707 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • W10 Enterprise 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ GW2765HT
      • Internet:
      • 225KB/s at best, 0 at worst

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Quote Originally Posted by will19565 View Post
    if i was in the market for a computer this size i would either go for the Intel Skull Canyon which is literally twice as fast and in the same price area and is semi upgradable or as the above poster says wait for the Ryzen Quad core APU.
    Literally the only advantage this has got is integrated (and pretty good) speakers.
    What do you mean *only*? Think how much energy efficiency it's gaining by not having a hot mess of LED lights! I doubt you can get such a suave chassis anywhere else, either.



    Still agree with everything said though.

  8. #8
    I really don't care
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    470
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    59 times in 47 posts
    • Dashers's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-5930K
      • Memory:
      • Corsair DDR4 2800 Quad
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750 PCIe SSD; RAID-0 x2 Samsung 850 EVO; RAID-0 x2 WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 x2 SLI
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster Silent Pro M2 720W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • x2 23.5" 1080 72Hz OC
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Yet the dedicated case manufacturers still only produce the same towers with ever increasing number of LEDs.

    Good job HP for being different and innovative.

    Heck, even my HP workstation tower at work is better put together and easier to work with than my Corsair case at home.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 3 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1070 AMP! EXTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: HP Pavilion Wave (600-a055na)

    Pretty much just echoing others here but yes, I love the design however couldn't justify paying so much for such low performance! It would give a good impression to customers if this was sat on top of a reception/customer services desk somewhere though I think.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •