Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 33

Thread: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,187
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,406 times in 528 posts

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    A Titan X in all but name?
    Read more.

  2. Received thanks from:

    virtuo (09-03-2017)

  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Worksop
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    14 times in 12 posts
    • KrisWragg's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock X370 Taichi
      • CPU:
      • AMD 1700X @ 3.7Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 500GB 950 Evo + 500GB 850 Evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R9 290 @ 1.1Ghz
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Platinum 660W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell U2713HM
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 78mbit down / 20mbit up

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Wish AMD would hurry up with Vega! This is a beast of a graphics card though, I wish I had a 4k screen so I could justify buying one of these!

    Currently my 290 is still holding up well at 1080p on a TV and 1440p on my monitor, need some more demanding games or a higher resolution screen I think.

  4. #3
    Tangential CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    25,898
    Thanks
    2,847
    Thanked
    3,896 times in 3,025 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    LOL,this it is faster than a Titan X and draws the same power.


    Go!Go! Gadget Underpants!

  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    "A Titan in all but name"....and price. Shows what a con the Titan X is.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts
    • 3s-gtech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 945 @ 3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • 120GB Samsung 850 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD 6870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Antec 550W
      • Case:
      • Antec Sonata II
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Doom:
    "Even the Radeon Fury X manages well in excess of 100 frames per second at the 4K test"

    60fps.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    248
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    22 times in 20 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    I like the removal of the DVI connector, it gives the potential to go "single slot" if watercooling.
    i7 4770K / Asus Maximus Gene VI / 16GB Corsair Vengeance / Asus Strix Advanced GTX1080 / Acer Predator X34A / 500G Samsung 840 EVO SSD / Ubuntu 17.10-x64 / W10

  8. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Still waiting for Vega...

  9. #8
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    921
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked
    45 times in 44 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    How underwhelming. I hyped it up in my mind so much I was expecting way more. Dunno why as I should have just looked at X benchmarks.

    If the AIO models come in at £700 I'll buy one. But can't see that happening. Might just get a 1080 and SLI the bugger.

  10. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • meuvoy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97-G45
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4460
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston 1866Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Adata 128GB SSD + 1,7TB HDD (inTotal)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia Geforce GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 750B2
      • Case:
      • Cougar 6GR1 Evolution
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 29" 21:9 Philips Brilliance 298P4QJEB

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Nice, but does those new 378.78 drivers really (I mean really) deliver more performance on DX12? Cuz if it doesn't then I think I'll buy an AMD card next time around, doesn't matter how much Tis Nvidia rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish around.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    699
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • rob4001's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte z97
      • CPU:
      • Xeon 1231 v3
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 256GB SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX980
      • PSU:
      • Sliverstone 500w SFX-L
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG13 mitx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Comcast 75MB

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    How big is the market for these cards?

  12. #11
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,442
    Thanks
    1,365
    Thanked
    2,775 times in 2,255 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    How big is the market for these cards?
    Given it's the same price as the 1080 was at launch, I'd say the same size as that at least

  13. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (09-03-2017)

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    How big is the market for these cards?
    The Ti cards always seem to be very popular. Many people will have waited for it.

  15. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    184
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 3 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1070 AMP! EXTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Very nice card indeed, not planning to go 4k for the foreseeable though so I think the 1070 will be enough for my needs for a while. I think once 4k is the mainstream standard I will look at it again, although I am sure there will be far better cards out by then too

    I do feel sorry for the folks who bought a 1080 or titan very recently not realizing this was coming!

  16. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    321
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    22 times in 18 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M5A97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-8320 @ 4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GiB Corsair Vengeance LP 1.35V 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 840 EVO 120GB SSD, 2x 3TB HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire (AMD) 6950 (with unlocked shaders)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CP-9020055-UK RM750
      • Case:
      • Nanoxia Deep Silence One
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-bit Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell WFP2407
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 (FTTC)

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    "Not full implementation of GP102"

    Thank you!

    I posted something about that on Ars and got downvoted to oblivion, probably by zealous Nvidia fans or people who didn't properly read my post.

    I simply do not believe that yields can be so low on GP102 now that Nvidia cannot release a "full-fat" GP102 implementation with 3840 shaders (30 blocks enabled instead of just 28) along with the max number of texture units (I think that'd be 240) and ROPs (96 I presume, unless they go beyond a 384-bit memory bus).

    As such, once again it feels like Nvidia is deliberately holding back just so it can release a new Titan X (or whatever) for the same >$1000+ price tag and claim it's still the enthusiast's hero. What's worse is that people still defend Nvidia for these kind of practices, just like how people defend Intel!

    I really, really hope that AMD isn't going to drop the ball with Vega or price it above Nvidia, just so that Nvidia has to actually compete a bit again. When there's no competition, we'll still get faster products, but they won't be as fast or as cheap as they should be.

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    1,560
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked
    211 times in 157 posts
    • virtuo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus GRYPHON Z87
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K @4.8Ghz Corsair H100i GTX
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb G.Skill TridentX 2400 @ CAS9
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 EVO 120Gb + Many, many HDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980Ti FTW
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 750W
      • Case:
      • be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 (Orange)
      • Operating System:
      • Win10, Fedora
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell U2515H 1440p DELL U3415W Ultrawide for Work
      • Internet:
      • PlusNet Unlimited 80Mb

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    "Not full implementation of GP102"

    Thank you!

    I posted something about that on Ars and got downvoted to oblivion, probably by zealous Nvidia fans or people who didn't properly read my post.

    I simply do not believe that yields can be so low on GP102 now that Nvidia cannot release a "full-fat" GP102 implementation with 3840 shaders (30 blocks enabled instead of just 28) along with the max number of texture units (I think that'd be 240) and ROPs (96 I presume, unless they go beyond a 384-bit memory bus).

    As such, once again it feels like Nvidia is deliberately holding back just so it can release a new Titan X (or whatever) for the same >$1000+ price tag and claim it's still the enthusiast's hero. What's worse is that people still defend Nvidia for these kind of practices, just like how people defend Intel!

    I really, really hope that AMD isn't going to drop the ball with Vega or price it above Nvidia, just so that Nvidia has to actually compete a bit again. When there's no competition, we'll still get faster products, but they won't be as fast or as cheap as they should be.
    I think they just want to keep a "better" titan in the barrel, just in case.

    Seems like a good card, but really wouldn't consider a base version without much better thermals.

    And the performance increase doesn't seem anywhere near the "35%" that was claimed. Not that those claims are ever true.

    Still. Want.

  18. #16
    Senior Member The Hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Posts
    1,321
    Thanks
    116
    Thanked
    67 times in 51 posts
    • The Hand's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus K8N-E Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Athlon 64 3200+ (s754)
      • Memory:
      • 2GB OCZ 2-2-2-5
      • Storage:
      • WD 300GB Maxtor 60GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 6800GT 256mb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 520w
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Praetorian
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP SP3
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 205BW 20"
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbps Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    What a monster! I hope AMD's big talk with Vega isn't just big talk and with Volta coming too they need to do well. Standard 1080s are falling in price and ebay will be awash with even cheaper 1080s. Just saw a good used 1080 go for the same price as a new 1070. For gamers there's no reason to go for the Titan unless you just like the name!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •