Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    25,647
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,382 times in 518 posts

    Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    Will faster memory cut it?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    25,066
    Thanks
    2,722
    Thanked
    3,784 times in 2,935 posts

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    The RX580 does seem quicker across the board even if not by much. Even the RX480 seems slightly quicker overall,which is more significant considering the GTX1060 tended to be slightly quicker overall at launch.


    Go!Go! Gadget Underpants!

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    £325 lol,pointless testing at this price should have just posted to just buy a 1070.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked
    27 times in 26 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    At £225 this would have been a competitive card - a couple less fps than a 580, for a bit less power and a bit less money than the 8GB. At £325 it's a joke. Other manufacturers are selling the 9Gbps version for less crazy prices (MSI for £275), but it's still a terrible choice

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    218
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • Bagpuss's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z97 Maximus VII Hero
      • CPU:
      • Intel 4690K @ 4.5Ghz (1.3vlts)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2400Mhz
      • Storage:
      • 1x256GB SSD 1x3TB 1x2TB 7200rpm Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • SLI ASUS 970 Strix (1280 Core)
      • PSU:
      • Superflower Leadex 650w Gold
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 450D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell UltraSharp U2414H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Fibre 200Mb

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    What kind of complete and utter tool would pay £325 for 1060...

  6. #6
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    13,813
    Thanks
    1,091
    Thanked
    1,971 times in 1,649 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    Quote Originally Posted by Xlucine View Post
    ... a couple less fps than a 580, for a bit less power ...
    I know the 580 on test was the stupid-clocked Sapphire Nitro+, but almost 100W is not a bit less power. It's almost 40% less for the whole system. And what's really key about that is not necessarily the power bill, but the heat build up. A system with an RX 580 in it is going to get a lot hotter than one with a 1060 in it. I've recently had to re-case a build because of heat build up; it's something anyone who likes compact computers needs to consider...

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    11 times in 9 posts

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    ScaryJim - as a SFF enthusiast myself, I hear what you're saying and agree, but it is worth remembering that the 40% power is only when gaming. The idle power consumptions are similar. Since the majority of most people's use will be web browsing, video, photo etc work, the power difference will likely be negligable. Of course, if you're folding or mining, MMO-ing 24/7 or whatever, then your GPU will be loaded most of the time, and it becomes a big deal.

    In most cases, though, a bump in power draw when doing something that kinda needs that power (gaming) isn't too unreasonable for most folks, provided there's at least some heat management in the system.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    £325.00 is way too much. (Unless you're a Maplins customer. I saw a 6Gb 1060 card on sale for £319.00 in a Maplins store recently. That must be over 30-40% mark up on a standard 6Gb 1060 card.)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked
    27 times in 26 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    I know the 580 on test was the stupid-clocked Sapphire Nitro+, but almost 100W is not a bit less power. It's almost 40% less for the whole system. And what's really key about that is not necessarily the power bill, but the heat build up. A system with an RX 580 in it is going to get a lot hotter than one with a 1060 in it. I've recently had to re-case a build because of heat build up; it's something anyone who likes compact computers needs to consider...
    What case was it, out of curiosity? There is a lot more wattage, but even the cheapest cases have a lot of mesh on them - I'm doubtful that it would be enough to thermally throttle anything except in very specific circumstances. As in, a really restricted case like you'd find a dell in or similar would overheat, but it'd overheat with the 1060 as well. It might affect an overclock, but that won't make much difference at all when gaming.

    If you're building in a tight case, then the 1060 has an advantage in length - I can't find any super short 580's, whereas short 1060's are common.

  10. #10
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    13,813
    Thanks
    1,091
    Thanked
    1,971 times in 1,649 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    Quote Originally Posted by Xlucine View Post
    What case was it, out of curiosity? ...
    It was a stupidly restrictive HTPC case, so a bit of a worse case scenario, but I've had other systems where I've had to take the side panel off a standard ATX tower and point a big fan into it to keep the internals cool. And at one of my workplaces our backups kept failing because we had an internal tape drive and the case temperate was rising above its thermal shut off point.

    I agree that for many cases it wouldn't be a problem, but it's something that needs to be considered when planning a build...

  11. #11
    Yay a custom user title! =assassin='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    732
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked
    47 times in 31 posts

    Re: Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps

    At £325 this card makes no sense. I'd easily choose spending a bit more to get the much faster 1070.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •