Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 26

Thread: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,079
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,401 times in 524 posts

    Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Le roi est mort, vive le roi.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    54
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    No reason to buy this over 1950X. 1950X can also OC, although not quite as high as this and really the performance delta is not so big. Also, the power consumption is quite similar, which is surprising given Intel technological advantage.

  3. #3
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    7,704
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    723 times in 625 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 660GB Linux, 500GB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 24 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    But I wanted a Core i11

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    This thing is ridiculously expensive for what it is. Who is going to use it? The only usage case I can see where this might legitimately be worth the money is professional game streamers. Otherwise you are better off getting Threadripper - or even Epyc, since the 24C48T sku was meant to be somewhere around this price point.

    Intel needs to get Coffee Lake out the door asap; at this point I can only think of three or four scenarios where an Intel processor makes more sense than Ryzen.
    CAPS LOCK IS NOT A BUTTON IT IS A WAY OF LIFE.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by CAPTAIN_ALLCAPS View Post
    at this point I can only think of three or four scenarios where an Intel processor makes more sense than Ryzen.
    Virtualization?

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by bdaniel7 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CAPTAIN_ALLCAPS View Post
    at this point I can only think of three or four scenarios where an Intel processor makes more sense than Ryzen.
    Virtualization?
    I would have thought that anyone who uses virtualisation seriously enough to need Intel's hardware support would really want ECC RAM too - which unless I am mistaken instantly means Xeons.
    CAPS LOCK IS NOT A BUTTON IT IS A WAY OF LIFE.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    135
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts
    • 3s-gtech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 945 @ 3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • 120GB Samsung 850 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD 6870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Antec 550W
      • Case:
      • Antec Sonata II
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    ...or Ryzen, with a little caution thrown in! http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...deep-dive.html

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    675
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    13 times in 12 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    you get this then 1 month latter AMD gives 24 cores for $1999 on the same TR4 socket, who will be the i-SHEEP?

  9. #9
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked
    44 times in 43 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by CAPTAIN_ALLCAPS View Post
    This thing is ridiculously expensive for what it is. Who is going to use it? The only usage case I can see where this might legitimately be worth the money is professional game streamers. Otherwise you are better off getting Threadripper - or even Epyc, since the 24C48T sku was meant to be somewhere around this price point.

    Intel needs to get Coffee Lake out the door asap; at this point I can only think of three or four scenarios where an Intel processor makes more sense than Ryzen.
    Literally no gamer needs this. There is no gaming workload that requires it, this is purely for workstation loads. Hell the 10 core thread could quite happily game, stream, AND encode the streams at the same time ha.

    This is basically a lower priced Xeon. I'd be interested to see how much of a dent it puts in the Xeon bottom line, as I know a ton of people switching over to i9s from double-socket xeon systems of only a few years past, and saving themselves several grand in the process.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    I might be wrong here, but the review states that 4.5ghz on 'Turbo 3.0' is only available to two cores on the 7980xe - and yet in the 'conclusion' it seems to suggest that 4.5ghz is available on ALL cores. Am i reading it wrong?

  11. #11
    HEXUS.social member Disturbedguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    4,901
    Thanks
    683
    Thanked
    423 times in 319 posts
    • Disturbedguy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T Deluxe v2
      • CPU:
      • i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Vengenance
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 60GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD 1 x 120 Corsair SSD 1 x 1TB Samsung HDD 1 x 500GBHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX260
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 1000W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32inch Samsung TV
      • Internet:
      • Crap

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    you get this then 1 month latter AMD gives 24 cores for $1999 on the same TR4 socket, who will be the i-SHEEP?
    Except AMD are regularly cheaper then Intel..... Your fanboyism is obvious
    Quote Originally Posted by TAKTAK View Post
    It didn't fall off, it merely became insufficient at it's purpose and got a bit droopy...

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    "the Intel Core i9-7980XE is the fastest consumer processor ever launched. A dose of overclocking makes it untouchable for heavily-threaded applications."

    Except by a 24 core epyc for $1050~, which proves much larger point. When fabric also soon gets around to multi gpu, neither intel or nvidia have anywhere to hide from amd's "modular and scalable" onslaught.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    557
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    43 times in 27 posts
    • Kanoe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z9PE-D8 WS
      • CPU:
      • 2x Intel Xeon 2670 @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Arctic White 32GB (8 x 4GB) @ Stock
      • Storage:
      • 240GB SanDisk Extreme II System Disk, 960GB SanDisk Ultra Games Drive, 1TB Samsung F3 Backup Drive
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 295X2 OC @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • Superflower 1200W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Primo v2
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" ASUS PB287Q 4k + 24" Dell U2412M
      • Internet:
      • VM @ 350/20

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by ohmaheid View Post
    I might be wrong here, but the review states that 4.5ghz on 'Turbo 3.0' is only available to two cores on the 7980xe - and yet in the 'conclusion' it seems to suggest that 4.5ghz is available on ALL cores. Am i reading it wrong?
    That's what Hexus got all cores running at when they overclocked the chip.

    I too was surprised that the power draw is a lot closer between AMD and Intel then I thought possible. I would like to think that it's because AMD did a good job rather than Intel doing a bad job.

  14. #14
    Tangential CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    25,743
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked
    3,873 times in 3,007 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanoe View Post
    That's what Hexus got all cores running at when they overclocked the chip.

    I too was surprised that the power draw is a lot closer between AMD and Intel then I thought possible. I would like to think that it's because AMD did a good job rather than Intel doing a bad job.
    Intel have a much more advanced 14NM process though(at least for desktop CPUs),so it seems more like they have pushed the current releases with regards to voltages and clockspeeds to make sure they have a "victory" over AMD.


    Go!Go! Gadget Underpants!

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    675
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    13 times in 12 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    .....complex mesh architecture....does this sound like 'gluing' processors? infinity fabric is not a bottleneck after all.

  16. #16
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-7980XE (14nm Skylake-X)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    Literally no gamer needs this. There is no gaming workload that requires it, this is purely for workstation loads. Hell the 10 core thread could quite happily game, stream, AND encode the streams at the same time ha.

    This is basically a lower priced Xeon. I'd be interested to see how much of a dent it puts in the Xeon bottom line, as I know a ton of people switching over to i9s from double-socket xeon systems of only a few years past, and saving themselves several grand in the process.
    Unless live capture encoding in x.264 (or maybe even x.265) is a lot less multithreaded than I think it is, good quality live capture video encoding would benefit greatly from this. People at the moment are a bit stuck, either using GPU capture (which washes away a lot of detail) or encoding somewhere on the fast - ultrafast spectrum. This i9 would enable both better image quality and smaller files - which if Youtube gaming and similar is your job does make a big difference.

    Of course what else you'd do with it is a very good question. Threadripper gives multithreaded performance that gets you very close for nearly half the price, and if money truly is no object in the quest for a superfast workstation then why not splash out and get the 24C Epyc complete with 8-channel RAM?
    CAPS LOCK IS NOT A BUTTON IT IS A WAY OF LIFE.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •