| |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| HEXUS.suggestions got any kind words to say, issues to raise, or constructive suggestions to make about HEXUS.net |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
12-01-2004, 07:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
The hover over message display thingy...
You know, when you leave you mouse over a message and it displays the first part of it (dunno what it's really called
 ).Anyway, can we perhaps have a setting to disable this? Or can you change it to onclick or something (:edit: - obviously not the title of the message as it will open it!)? It's really handy to read the first part of the post without even opening the message, but on the same hand it's annoying when it brings up a big box and covers the headings of other messages... I don't wanna cause any bother or extra work, so if this can't easily be done just send a slap my way. 
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 07:57 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
HEXUS.net Webmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 3,113
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
couldn't do it onClick as the URL would open when you clicked. Shorty will let you know if it can be disabled as he's the forum guru. They should disappear when you move the mouse off the link though
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 07:59 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
The onclick suggestion was about the surrounding box, obviously not the link as it wouldn't open then.
If Shorty can't do it then no-one can, eh?
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 08:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Furry
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Onclick == teh noes!
However, would this be a good compromise... right now.. tis the box.. how about if I move the alt text to just the hyperlink?
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 08:16 PM
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
Sounds great! As long as no-one else has any problems with that!
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 08:19 PM
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
That's cool! Much better thank you!
I hope you get paid well for this!
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 08:21 PM
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Furry
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Big_Al
I work for cookies. Big chocolate cookies
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 08:28 PM
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
The electronic type, or the real type?
Seriously, do you guys not get paid?
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
18-01-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
Is it me, or is this not working anymore?
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
18-01-2004, 12:51 PM
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Shorty
Hmm, just me then. I'll report it later if it still doesn't work after restarting my machine or something.
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
18-01-2004, 12:54 PM
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Furry
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I got my missus to check it on her rig with IE6.. and it works, so it might be browser having a moment of stupidity...
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
|
|
|
|
|
18-01-2004, 02:40 PM
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 6,570
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 18 Posts
|
Ya, working now... stoopid compy!
If cars had followed the same developmental path as computers, a Rolls Royce would cost £60, get a million miles per gallon and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
|
|
|
|
|
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
