![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| HEXUS.wargames This is for any war game simulation. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
HEXUS.social Lackey
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cosford
Posts: 791
Thanks: 16
Thanked 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
Pah! The Eurofighter can do the same. Except the flips at the top of a climb (lack a thrust vectoring). But then, looking at that video, the F22 drops quite a bit to regain its energy. The Eurofighter also can't "hover" vertically because the software takes over from the pilot!
Still pretty impressive. Pity the Americans are too scared to put it in the air at the same time as us ![]() Also is 3 times cheaper and can carry more weapons ![]() |
|
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt; then it's bloody hilarious!
![]() Birmingham Meet 2008 Attendee x2 H3XU5.lan Member (Avatar shamelessly nicked from Penny-Arcade) |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,331
Thanks: 75
Thanked 179 Times in 158 Posts
|
Have you seen the show of the Mig29 it think? Didn't just hover vertically, it then dropped tail first in a contolled manner before recovering to normal attitude. It was some years ago now, and stunned the western world as we didn't imagine building engines that could fire up while air was flowing through them in the wrong direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,650
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
alot of aircraft can perform that manouever (Su-30 I think it was), the Typhoon should be able to do it too (dependent on the engines remaining lit).
The Typhoon could get thrust vectoring if money allows it |
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Resident Abit Fanboi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sunny Glasgow
Posts: 6,885
Thanks: 6
Thanked 116 Times in 109 Posts
|
|
|
abit IP35 Pro, E6600/NH-12F, X1900XT, FSP 700W abit AB9 QuadGT, E6600/SI-120, 7800GT, FSP 600W abit AX78, 5000+ Black Edition/XP-120, 7800GT, Corsair HX520 My HEXUS.trust abit forums |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Crazy HEXUS.net
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Void.. Floating
Posts: 10,337
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 46 Posts
|
I've seen the Typhoon a couple of times now - very impressive, standing it on it's tail and just hitting full thrust.. *whoosh* and it's a speck in the sky in a couple of seconds
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by silent ben
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Va Va Voom
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Walsall
Posts: 4,634
Thanks: 54
Thanked 43 Times in 35 Posts
|
What I like about seeing the F22 do those maneuvers is that it never looks like it's on the 'edge'. Watch the Russian videos and it doesn't look very smooth to me, as if the plane really is on the edge of stability and is about to fall out the air in a bad way... The F22 never seems to be in that state - I guess due to the huge amount of computer horsepower actually flying it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Crazy HEXUS.net
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Void.. Floating
Posts: 10,337
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 46 Posts
|
Yeah, watching some of those Langley videos, the word that sprang to mind was "control"..
Although re-watching it the words "slow" and "lazy" also sprang to mind.. What we need is some Red Flag footage! ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by silent ben
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
HEXUS.social Lackey
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cosford
Posts: 791
Thanks: 16
Thanked 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
I believe I read somewhere that the computers onboard the F22 actually use Intel chips
. If it wasn't covered in Radar Absorbent Material, would probably be covered with "Intel Inside" stickers . |
|
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt; then it's bloody hilarious!
![]() Birmingham Meet 2008 Attendee x2 H3XU5.lan Member (Avatar shamelessly nicked from Penny-Arcade) |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,900
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
|
This pretty good
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY0t_mPv6I4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Questioning it all
Posts: 6,147
Thanks: 43
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
|
I mean don't get me wrong it is a thing of beauty being able to fly like that, but strictly speaking in this world of kill your opponent from 80km+ away if you get him on radar is this ability to do all this funky stuff really needed in a military air jet?.
I'm sure the tech is pretty smart and these machines might be useful for investing time and effort to give this kind of vectoring space travel. TiG |
|
-- Hexus Meets Rock! --
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,900
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
|
During the original Gulf war the coalition found it surprisingly difficult to shoot down its enemy using long range missiles. One intrepid Iraqi pilot managed to evade a grand total of 30 missiles in his unsuccessful attempt to bag an AWACS, but he did manage to scare the US AWACS off its patrol so it had to return to base. Without AWACS the fighters lose the ability to tell where the enemy is coming from, and by flying low and hard the attacker can get the upper hand.
Just about everybody thought dog fighting died out in WW2, but the US found out that long range missile armed aircraft will often lose out to more agile short range missile and cannon armed opposition, this resulted in the creation of the top gun academy. Once again high maneuverability fighters seem to be the order of the day, all air forces want them, maybe because the shoot from afar tactics don't work that well. ALso in order to be able to use long range missiles you have to be high, this opens you up to ground mased missile. One reason the back flip manouvers are so popular is they allow you to launch at an enmy behind you, most of the current Russian designs have rear facing radar, they have trialled rear firing missiles, not sure if they have been deployed yet. |
Last edited by Flibb; 30-04-2007 at 10:42 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|