![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
Networking and Broadband ADSL, cable, internet and network advice and chat ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Members' Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
NTL investigates 18Mbps next-generation broadband technology
Originally Posted by Computer Buyer
http://www.computerbuyer.co.uk/?news...y.php?id=70744
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
No smoking, No joking
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
3GB would be harsh probably more like 200GB.
Does anyone else find it strange that they are trialling adsl2 when they have a predominantly cable network? Wonder if moby cares to grace us with an adslguide speedtest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northants + Derby
Posts: 3,625
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think Moby is getting 2Mb down, 512 up so its not massive increases over whats available now.
802.11n looks interesting, up to 630Mbps and backwards compatable. Nice.
HEXUS|iMc
Last edited by iMc; 24-03-2005 at 11:44 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Gordy
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,473
Thanks: 47
Thanked 35 Times in 22 Posts
|
Daniel , I think its because its cheaper to use the existing infrastructure that the laid down for telephone cables for their ntl areas that to lay more cables. It doesnt use bt lines from memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Shibai taro ka
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,043
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
I still think the gov should sub NTL to extend their network. Then NTL should pay them back with the profits. or something like that. I think its stupid that they are not made to network even new property developments which are right next to the network anyway.
Dedham dedham
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
?!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,036
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Gordy
Pretty much. Its much cheaper than having to re-engineer their cable networks for a system upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Almost in control.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Region 2
Posts: 3,943
Thanks: 30
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
Ok, maybe this will explain things better... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/22/ntl_adsl2/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Spodes Henchman
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 2,390
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Cable isn't limited at 18MBps - it can go upto around 41MBps IIRC ... I think what they are really doing is they are beefing up the rest of they're infrastructure.
G4 PowerMac - Tiger 10.4 - 512MB RAM MacBook - 2Ghz - 1GB RAM - 120GB HDD Rotel RC970BX | DBX DriveRack |2x Rotel RB850 B&W DM640i | Velodyne 1512 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
?!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,036
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Originally Posted by unrealrocks
Yes , but 41Mbps (btw Capital B = Bytes, little b = bits, networks always little b) has to be shared between hundreds of users. With ADSL , there's a 1 on 1 link between customer premises and DSLAM.
Sharing takes place after that, and since NTL use some form of multiplexing via its fibre network, its much easier to deliver bandwidth to the DSLAM at the green boxes, rather than splitting and cleaning up a copper network. From what I read, moving to Docsis v3 would bring in huge costs compared to moving to ADSL. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NTL stuff | Zak33 | Networking and Broadband | 1 | 05-02-2005 03:00 PM |