![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
| |||||||
Networking and Broadband ADSL, cable, internet and network advice and chat ![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Administrator | Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask all credit for this goes to Miggyman who wrote such a nice post on DNS record types , I felt it needed recording for posterity. please direct your gifts and admiration to him. --------------------------------------------------- For those interested, your basic dns records are as follows A = Address record, A records are used to map an IP address to a hostname or subdomain. CNAME = Canonical name, a CNAME record refereces another record, effectivley making it an alias, normaly used to map a subdomain to an existing domain. MX = Mail exchanger, an MX record specifies a mail server for the domain, normaly more than one will be specified and they will be given a priority to denote which server to try first (for backup mail servers etc) NS = Name server, an NS record lists the DNS servers responsible for the domain, again more than one can and normaly is provided so if the primary server fails a backup can be used. PTR = Pointer, a PTR record is used to resolve an ip address to a name, PTR records are what make reverse lookups work. SOA = Start of authority, a SOA record contains a lot of the basic information about the domain relating to how updates should be handled, primary name server and contact detail. And because im a nice guy.. you can all have a nice example zone file - = SOA record = - ------------------- @ IN SOA ns0.example.com. hostmaster.example.com. ( 2005081701 ; Serial 10800 ; Refresh 3600 ; Retry 3600000 ; Expire 86400 ) ; Minimum - = MX Record2 = - ------------------- MX 5 mx1.example.com. MX 5 mx2.example.com. - = NS Records = - ------------------ IN NS ns0.example.com. IN NS ns1.example.com. - = A Records = - ---------------- @ IN A 999.888.777.666 cvs IN A 888.888.888.888 These effectivley map example.com to 999.888.777.666 (yes, i know it's invalid!) and cvs.example.com to 888.888.888.888. It's worth noting this a record is special since the "@" means all destinations not setup in the zone file for this domain goto this, this is effectivley the "base" level of the dns. - = CNAME Record = - ---------------------- www IN CNAME example.com. This maps the www subdomain (yes, it is actualy a subdomain :O) to example.com, any changes made to the record for example.com automaticly filter back to www, www.example.com will go to 999.999.999.999, subdomains can basicly be pointed anywhere you want to point them I've not listed a PTR record in this zone file because well, it wouldnt go in one, the PTR records would go into a zone file for the IP range as oppsed to the hostname, such a file would be named 777.888.999.in-addr.arpa and the PRT records would be specified using the last octet. So for example.com we'd have a PTR record like this 666 IN PTR example.com. This has been an InfoMiggy broadcast for the rubber chicken network |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Cable Guy Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Loughborough Uni
Posts: 4,274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
| Blast from the past, I'm going to post in this thread. Is there anything wrong with not having a "www" entry? Is the redirecting of http://www.example.com to http://example.com done in Apache / web server of choice? How can you have http://caged.net work, but not http://randomsubdomain.caged.net (if I read you right, setting @ in the A records would make every random sub domain entry work? |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Does he need a reason? Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 16,129
Thanks: 329
Thanked 632 Times in 531 Posts
| re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask For once, this is a good bump ![]() Hadn't seen this thread before. Tis a good read. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Southampton/Chippenham
Posts: 5,063
Thanks: 167
Thanked 410 Times in 375 Posts
| re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask It is - and well worth its sticky status. Is YOUR system up to Folding? Useful Information about HEXUS There are 10 types of people who understand binary - those that do... and those that don't. Last edited by peterb; 06-03-2008 at 04:30 PM.. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Network|Geek | re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask I've read it a few times, and its still a good read. How geeky am I, saying its a good read, I say the same about my CCNA Routing Protocols book! "If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much room!" - me, 2005 |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Gentoo Ricer Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: /var/portage
Posts: 5,722
Thanks: 66
Thanked 266 Times in 247 Posts
| re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask Originally Posted by Jonny M No, there's nothing stopping you from using just the root domain as a webserver, typically when you type (for e.g.) microsoft.com, either the browser can connect to it and gets a redirect to the www. address, or the domain host refuses the connection (because there's no httpd) and the browser automatically tries to prefix the address with www. to see if it has any better luck. However, that said, it's normally best practice to keep http and dns servers on logically or physically separate hosts, as a sort of security padding, but not particularly necessary, on some hosts it doesn't make a difference, depending on how it's set up, usually www. subhosts are just CNAMEs, or A's to a virtual nic, because it's cheaper.
Originally Posted by Agent
Server Box -> Asus P5B-E Plus | C2D E6320 | 2x2GB GieL PC2-6400 | 6x500GB (md-raid5) | nVidia 7300LE | Ubuntu Server 9.10 (for now) Test Box -> P4E 3.2Ghz Rev. E0 | Asus P4C800-E Deluxe | 2x1GB PC3200 | 2x160Gb | nVidia TNT 2 | Gentoo (X86) Currently breaking: eINIT |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask Just wondering...didn't you mean "were" instead of "where" in your thread name ?".........know about DNS records but where afriad to ask" other than that, thanks for this post |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| I R Toff Pandi! | re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask Originally Posted by Kay-Q but thats just nit-picking...
if you followed the same lines then you'd have to pick out the 'afriad' in the title too |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| I Get Daily HeXuscise Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Jita
Posts: 5,418
Thanks: 114
Thanked 253 Times in 194 Posts
| Re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask It may be worth also mentioning that the minimum TTL should be 43200. Having less than that can some times put you on blacklists such as SORBS. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask Hi Admin Not only Miggyman, but you also wrote very well about DNS. I forgot to tell.. I am Nick Adam from NY. I am new to this forum and this is my first post. Coming back with some cool stuff. Nick |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: London
Posts: 410
Thanks: 22
Thanked 29 Times in 27 Posts
| Re: Everything you wanted to know about DNS records but were afraid to ask You missed a couple of record types, that people might increasingly see. AAAA = ipv6 ip address TXT = Text record. SPF = Sender Policy Framework, this can also be done in a TXT record IN TXT "v=spf1 ...." A full list of DNS record types, not for the faint of heart. |
| | |
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
| ||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compact Disc Digital Audio | Zak33 | Audio/Visual - Standard and HD | 20 | 06-08-2004 03:12 PM |
| Need a DNS expert | Steve | Networking and Broadband | 2 | 26-04-2004 12:32 PM |
| ADSL DNS nightmare... I think it's DNS anyhoo | Tumble | Networking and Broadband | 5 | 03-03-2004 12:02 PM |
| Forum Speed | DR | General discussion | 10 | 04-01-2004 10:58 AM |