Headlines - OCZ goes beyond Vista's memory demands, launches 8GB and 16GB upgrade kit

[HEXUS]

Microsoft's 64-bit edition of Windows Vista has shed the previous 2GB memory limitation, so how about an 8GB or 16GB upgrade kit?

Read more.

[Crevan]

I guess anything above 4GB would be overkill for most users right now. But since I've already got 4GB of Platinum series from OCZ, it's good to know that, should I need/want to, I'll be able to crank that up to 12GB =)

[PeterStoba]

I seen the 16GB kit on aria for £300 or so i think it was, ridiculous

[kingpotnoodle]

Originally Posted by PeterStoba

I seen the 16GB kit on aria for £300 or so i think it was, ridiculous

It's not ridiculous if you actually use all that RAM...

For Joe Average it's a daft purchase... to someone who works with massive amounts of data, the people they mention above... £300 is a small price to pay.

[this_is_gav]

Originally Posted by HEXUS

Microsoft's 64-bit edition of Windows Vista has shed the previous 2GB memory limitation, so how about an 8GB or 16GB upgrade kit?

It's got nothing to do with Vista...

Got 8GB myself, and it was only because of the ludicrously low prices and Vista's SuperFetch to be honest. It's not needed at all, but it's great to see pretty much every program open from RAM.

If you've a need for 16GB, chances are you'll be wanting ECC for a high-end workstation rather than your average desktop RAM.

Most current boards are advertised as only supporting 8GB, but whether that's true or just them covering untested set ups, I've no idea.

[pauldarkside]

Originally Posted by this_is_gav

Got 8GB myself, and it was only because of the ludicrously low prices and Vista's SuperFetch to be honest. It's not needed at all, but it's great to see pretty much every program open from RAM.

Same here, I upgraded a few weeks ago and flogged the 4GB I had in the forums. When running multiple VMs it's quite nice being able to allocate a couple of gigs here and there without hindering the performance of other applications I'm running concurrently.

Looking forwards to Adobe releasing CS4 with its 64bit support next.

(Note to self, must order that quad core at the weekend - hope Scan has it on special!)

[latrosicarius]

Whoever says 8GB is overkill has obviously never used VMs

[Crevan]

Originally Posted by latrosicarius

Whoever says 8GB is overkill has obviously never used VMs

Not outside uni, I didn't. Can't think of a reason why I should be using one at home.

[dangel]

Originally Posted by OCZ

64-bit operating systems are becoming more mainstream and finally enable user memory to shed the 2GB limitation of 32-bit OS.

Is he on about process limit versus OS? Hope so.

[latrosicarius]

Originally Posted by Crevan

... Can't think of a reason why I should be using one [a VM] at home.

well, at home you could use them for running old OS's to play your favorite old games. Also, if a program won't let you open up more than one instance, and you absolutely *need* to open another instance of it, you can run it in a VM. I've done this with diablo 2, and it's much safer than downloading a crack

[Clunk]

Originally Posted by latrosicarius

Whoever says 8GB is overkill has obviously never used VMs

Or Norton System Works.

[Barkotron]

Originally Posted by dangel

Is he on about process limit versus OS? Hope so.

I'd say that's why he said "user memory" - he's talking about the user space/kernel space limits.