Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

  1. #1
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,757
    Thanks
    1,954
    Thanked
    2,834 times in 2,213 posts

    Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)


  2. #2
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,818
    Thanks
    447
    Thanked
    1,032 times in 952 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • PhenomII x4 955 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 2x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 250gb SATA Westerndigital + 500gb samsung
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX560ti CuII
      • PSU:
      • Be Quiet E9 680w
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • XP pro & w7 beta
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer P223w 22" TFT DVI

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    nice but they don't look at prices which is going to be a major factor for nettops, having an i3 mobile processor gives a massive jump in performance but I suspect it's added a big jump to the cost too.

    Pob's new mod, Soviet Pob Propaganda style Laptop.
    "Are you suggesting that I can't punch an entire dimension into submission?" - Flying squirrel - The Red Panda Adventures

  3. #3
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,757
    Thanks
    1,954
    Thanked
    2,834 times in 2,213 posts

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    The VIA Nano X2 does not do too badly! OTH,it really does need a better IGP,although S3 is now owned by HTC??

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    /dev/boogie
    Posts
    2,321
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    146 times in 134 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M4A78-E
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II 955BE
      • Memory:
      • 4x2GB PC6400 Corsair XMS2
      • Storage:
      • 660GB Linux, 500GB Games (Win 7)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit 460GTX 2GB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 17 + Win 7 Pro 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152 23" lcd
      • Internet:
      • 8Mb ADSL

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    This bit surprised me: "The other thing you need to know about Intel's desktop-oriented Atoms is that they don't support SpeedStep, meaning they don't reduce their clock speed and always run at their full operating frequency."

    Please tell me that isn't true, even by Intel standards that would be quite a fail if it is.

  5. #5
    <<== UT3 Player spoon_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,871
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked
    123 times in 115 posts

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    Zotac ID82 barebone is about £300 and you have to add your own RAM and HDD - certainly not cheap...

  6. #6
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,818
    Thanks
    447
    Thanked
    1,032 times in 952 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • PhenomII x4 955 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 2x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 250gb SATA Westerndigital + 500gb samsung
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX560ti CuII
      • PSU:
      • Be Quiet E9 680w
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • XP pro & w7 beta
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer P223w 22" TFT DVI

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    This bit surprised me: "The other thing you need to know about Intel's desktop-oriented Atoms is that they don't support SpeedStep, meaning they don't reduce their clock speed and always run at their full operating frequency."

    Please tell me that isn't true, even by Intel standards that would be quite a fail if it is.
    that would indeed be a massive fail, esp as the originals do.
    my eeepc 901 (first netbook to use the atom cpu) steps down the multiplier fine.

    Pob's new mod, Soviet Pob Propaganda style Laptop.
    "Are you suggesting that I can't punch an entire dimension into submission?" - Flying squirrel - The Red Panda Adventures

  7. #7
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Maidenhead
    Posts
    8,130
    Thanks
    878
    Thanked
    583 times in 487 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Corsair H100 with Alpenfohn Fans) @4.7Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB Corsair Force GT, 2 x Seagate Momentus XT 320GB(RAID 0), 2 x Samsung F3 500GB (RAID 1)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x MSI GTX660 Ti Power Edition
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • Plus Net 80/20

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    Im pretty sure my Aspire Revo speedsteps but i must confess, i have never properly checked. Its just sat gathering dust at the moment anyway, need to sort it out!

  8. #8
    "make it so" scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    9,236
    Thanks
    726
    Thanked
    1,144 times in 1,008 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X4 905e
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical VLP
      • Storage:
      • 750GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 7750 Low Profile
      • PSU:
      • FSP 250W TFX
      • Case:
      • AOpen H360b
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • IBM ThinkVision C220P (6735-60N) (22" CRT)

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    Certainly the first generation only had speedstep for the netbook versions (Nxxx), not the desktop versions.

    A quick check of ark ...... confirms that even the latest generation desktop Atoms (e.g. Atom D2700) do *not* support speedstep. The mobile/netbook versions do, though. Another instance of Intel's feature-ripping differentiation scheme...

  9. #9
    Militant Battle Moose! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Planet Of The Moose
    Posts
    18,757
    Thanks
    1,954
    Thanked
    2,834 times in 2,213 posts

    Re: Seven nettops compared (VIA Nano to latest Atom CPUs)

    It looks like the D2700 has been cancelled:

    http://www.tech2date.com/intel-to-st...d2700-cpu.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •