New Nikons !! ISO 3,280,000 !

[g8ina]

http://www.europe-nikon.com/en_GB/pr...rofessional/d5

Pardon ?

You heard me Harris, I said ISO 3,280,000 !

Oh My God, my knees have gone.

[ik9000]

ISO 3,280,000???!?!

[Bobster]

iso 3,280,000???!?!

sony

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

Nikon D500 too:

http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-pro...eras/d500.html

[kalniel]

Or just underexpose and up in PP.

[Spreadie]

http://www.europe-nikon.com/en_GB/pr...rofessional/d5

Pardon ?

You heard me Harris, I said ISO 3,280,000 !

Oh My God, my knees have gone.

You heard me, g8ina, I said £5200

Oh, my god, my knees have gone!

[ha3aro]

Has anyone seen a sample image at such a high ISO? woul it be usable in any way, shape or form? and has the IQ level at lower ISO been improved? are we still in the numbers race? Am I cynical???

[MrJim]

ISO 3,280,000???!?!

Sorry to be *that person*, but shouldn't that be "to whom do I give my money?".

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

Shooting impressions with the D500:

http://www.ishootshows.com/2016/01/0...0-and-sb-5000/

[Bobster]

Shooting impressions with the D500:

http://www.ishootshows.com/2016/01/0...0-and-sb-5000/

what a shocker, no high res, high ISO shots in the real world posted :/

[Bagnaj97]

There's a pic in this article with a photo of the D5 LCD showing an image taken at 1640000 ISO. Definitely not a usable image, but perhaps useful for framing/focusing/composition before dialling the ISO back down and doing a long exposure?

[Bobster]

There's a pic in this article with a photo of the D5 LCD showing an image taken at 1640000 ISO. Definitely not a usable image, but perhaps useful for framing/focusing/composition before dialling the ISO back down and doing a long exposure?

yup, knew it was going to look like ass.

[ik9000]

Nikon D500: ISO 1,6 Millionen zeigt sich wenig praktikabel - aber besser als kein Foto.

A 1.6 million ISO image is less usable (lit. practicable) - but better than no photo at all.

yup, knew it was going to look like ass.

I think it's incredible that at such a high ISO it's able to capture that snowstorm so accurately.

[ik9000]

Die reguläre Maximal-ISO von ISO 51.200 dagegen schon.

The max ISO for decent images is 51,200

[kalniel]

A 1.6 million ISO image is less usable (lit. practicable) - but better than no photo at all.

But again why no photo at all? It doesn't make a huge amount of difference whether the gain is done by the camera or by a computer. If you need ISO-MEGA for shutter speed then underexpose ISO-LESS-MEGA to give the same shutter speed and up exposure in PP.

We're practically at the point of ISO invariance so we might as well take at the best ISO for the sensor and sort everything out in PP

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

I think I would rather have a D610, D750 or D7200 and use the difference to buy a better lens for telephoto work.

I do some airshow stuff,and the AF on my D600 is not meant to be ideal,with its central clustering of AF points,but after trying some newer telephoto lens,it seem to make more of a difference.