![]() |
|
Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Photography and Graphic Design Discussion about photography and graphic design. No profanity or nudity allowed. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
there but for the grace of God, go I
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: West London
Posts: 3,400
Thanks: 19
Thanked 68 Times in 48 Posts
|
20, 30 or 40D
Alright, found out that neither the business insurance nor home insurance covers me for my recently stolen camera, so I have to make a decision as to what to replace it with, given that I'm paying for it out of my own pocket.
The 40D is out of my price range, but I'd love to know if anyone thinks that a brand new 40D is worth the premium I'd pay over a secondhand 20 or 30D. I was looking at a secondhand 10D but as I was just about ready to upgrade (in the next six months or so) to something better, I'm reluctant to go down that route - plus, I want a new toy for all my pain and suffering ![]() I see that 30Ds are going for around the £350 mark, while the 20Ds is around £250. Given that I'm going to have to replace my new Tamron 17-50mm lens too, is the 30D worth the extra £100? TIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maidenhead
Posts: 659
Thanks: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
I know Bobster on here uses a 20D and he gets some great images.
I use a 30D and get some occasional great images. Think it's more about the photographer than the camera. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Spanked Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
I looked into this with my recent purchase of the 30D, I think the main differences were that the 30D had a much bigger LCD screen and Spot Metering over the 20D.
I bought the 30D as I found one at the same price of a 20D, albeit without manuals, software, cables etc. I think the larger screen is probably useful if you're trying to learn what you're doing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Photographer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sunny Dorset
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 3
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
IQ from the 40D out weighs the 20 and 30, if you have the option, then 40D is the body to buy.. i know a great deal of wedding photographers who have bought it and sware by the highlight tone priority mode!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Resident Abit Fanboi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sunny Glasgow
Posts: 6,816
Thanks: 6
Thanked 111 Times in 104 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
|
|
abit IP35 Pro, E6600/NH-12F, X1900XT, FSP 700W abit AB9 QuadGT, E6600/SI-120, 7800GT, FSP 600W abit AX78, 5000+ Black Edition/XP-120, 7800GT, Corsair HX520 My HEXUS.trust abit forums |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK, Stourbridge
Posts: 800
Thanks: 11
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
my dad has a 40d, and other than the size of it in ur hand, i cant see a major benefit over my 400d.
|
![]() : Ste Gough : stegoughwww.stegough.com
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Boomerang Admin
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,836
Thanks: 28
Thanked 318 Times in 200 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
Originally Posted by mmh
There are several benefits, but whether they're major or not depends on what you use it for.
The first benefit is build quality. It's not fully pro-spec waterproofed, but is more robustly built .... i.e. mag-alloy chassis rather than steel and plastic. It's also a lot faster, so for action shots, your burst rate is much higher. There's a number of things (3" screen, LiveView, etc) but perhaps the most important difference (and it shows the target buyer) is DIGIC III and it's 14-bit capability. If you shoot RAW, and especially when you're doing post-processing, that gives you much more tone depth to work with, so you have less risk of dropping tones. Oh, and the exposure system, with the Highlight Tone priority mode Bobster mentioned. The differences can be quite subtle, but they are most definitely there ..... if your photography will take advantage of them. Having said that, the 400D is still damn capable and the differences in image quality are subtle. Quite possibly worthwhile, especially for advanced users, but subtle. |
|
Noli nothis permittere te terere.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Photographer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sunny Dorset
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 3
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
you forgot that the 40D has superiour focusing than the 400D as well.. and
40D has ISO3200 inbetween ISO selection ie ISO 125 etc faster max shutter speed a buffer for 75 JPG over the 400's 27.. the ability to shoot sRAW if required an improved menu interface longer shutter life easier controls - joystick instead of 4 way cursor and so on.. i'd even choose a 20D over a 400.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
there but for the grace of God, go I
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: West London
Posts: 3,400
Thanks: 19
Thanked 68 Times in 48 Posts
|
Re: 20, 30 or 40D
Know how much he's asking for it?
I think that even the 30 is out of my price range atm.....I'm just pricing up some 20Ds on Ebay..... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Breadcrumb | ||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|