• HEXUS
  • HEXUS.tv
  • channel
  • gaming
  • lifestyle
  • trust
  • community
  • ESReality
  • HEXUS.community discussion forumsVisit Corsair.com

    Welcome to the HEXUS.community discussion forums forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    Go Back   HEXUS.community discussion forums > HEXUS.channels > General discussion > Question Time

    Question Time like the BBC current affairs TV program, a place to discuss current affairs, topical events and world matters

    Reply
     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
    Old 23-04-2007, 10:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
    0iD
    \../ >,< \../
     
    0iD's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2003
    Location: People's Republic of 0iD, Suffolk
    Posts: 7,865
    Thanks: 220
    Thanked 247 Times in 160 Posts
    0iD's system
    Bio Ethanol Vehicles Pose A Significant Risk To Human Health, Study Finds

    Interesting, thought this was supposed to be te 'green' alternative to Petrol...
    Ethanol is widely touted as an eco-friendly, clean-burning fuel. But if every vehicle in the United States ran on fuel made primarily from ethanol instead of pure gasoline, the number of respiratory-related deaths and hospitalizations would likely increase, according to a new study by Stanford University atmospheric scientist Mark Z. Jacobson. His findings are published in the April 18 online edition of the journal Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T).
    http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/new...h-study-finds/

    FOLD FOR HEXUS! It's your duty.
    Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    Just doesn't feel right when it's not SIM..
    0iD is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 23-04-2007, 10:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
    radix lecti
     
    dave87's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Sep 2005
    Location: Norwich (UEA), Essex Home :)
    Posts: 7,666
    Thanks: 33
    Thanked 105 Times in 75 Posts
    dave87's system
    Don't stick your nose in it then

    Worrying that all the alternatives to petrol are as bad or worse for us than petrol is...(except electric, but that requires heavy batteries which have acid in them - not good if you crash)

    Originally Posted by Bazzlad View Post
    Relax, Richard Dawkins is an idiot. He'll be dead soon.

    dave87 is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 23-04-2007, 05:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    JPreston's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Posts: 1,309
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
    Originally Posted by dave87 View Post
    ...(except electric, but that requires heavy batteries which have acid in them - not good if you crash)
    When I'm trapped and bleeding in the crumpled wreck of my car, I'd know what I'd rather watch as it trickles around the place....

    (I'm sure the batteries in electric cars aren't the acid type anyway)
    JPreston is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 23-04-2007, 05:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
    Better paid than Directhex :)
     
    dangel's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: Cambridge, UK
    Posts: 5,590
    Thanks: 177
    Thanked 142 Times in 122 Posts
    dangel's system
    lithium-ion aren't they?

    Te audire non possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    System 001: Asus P5Q Deluxe, Q6600 @ 3.0ghz, D-Tek FuZion V2 CPU Block, GTX280, Alphacool GPU Block, 4GIG Corsair 6400 DDR2 RAM CL4 @ 800mhz, Corsair HX1000, Dell 2001FP, Logitech 5.1, Seagate 7200.10 320gb x 2 (RAID 0), 500 GIG 7200.9 (backups), Antec 1200 case, Thermochill 120.3 rad, Vario Pump, Vista Ult 64/XP Pro 32 [main] WORK IN PROGRESS
    System 002: 4200X2, ASROCK (my ass-rocks!) 939 uATX MB, ATI1650 (passive), Zalman 500W psu, IIyama 17" LCD, £7's worth of 5.1 speakers (they rock) XP Pro [wife/server]
    System 003: AOpen 1557 GLSLaptop, ATI 9600 64mb, 1.5 GIG of DDR2700 memory, 60gig fujitsu HD 8mb cache, Intel Wireless and it's great! XP Pro [main lappy]
    System 004: ASUS A8N Premium, 4200 X2, 2 GIG Corsair, Silverstone HTPC case, XP120 cooler, 8600GTS (passive), Samsung 500GIG, MCE Remote, Samsung 40" LCD (87BDX) via HDMI Vista Home Premium (32) [media centre]
    System 005: 7" Asus Eee PC 701-B Intel Mobile, 2GB DDR2, 4GB Solid State HDD, Linux Deleted - XP to replaced it!, Black [toy]
    Work System 001: HP supplied Quad Core Q6600, 2gb DDR 2, 400gb SATA RAID 0, 250gb SATA backup drive, nVidia 8800GTS 640mb, Dell 2001FP, iiyama VM Pro 451 Vista Ult 64/Vista Ult 32 SERVICE PACK 1 [main work system]

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Directory Opus 9 rocks! (click here) Opera Ad-Blocker (click here)

    dangel is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 23-04-2007, 07:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
    Senior Member
     
    JPreston's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Posts: 1,309
    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
    Actually, I should know as I worked on an Electric Vehicle Project for a car manufacturer once (marketing them to councils and the like - basically anyone who would want a car that weighed 800kg extra to silently crept up behind unsuspecting pedestrians). That was 10 years ago - as you can see I did a good job as we all drive electric cars now

    At the time I think they were nickel cadmium - lithium batteries were too expensive. But batteries have come on leaps and bounds since then so they may well be lithium (or some even better tech) now though.

    A lot of people say 'ah but what would happen in a crash' about LPG/hydrogen/etc....forgetting that petrol and petrol vapour are ridiculously volatile too. Mind you we did have a couple of techs killed overseas when their LPG car exploded on a test drive, so maybe there's a reason why you still aren't allowed to park them in underground car parks and the like
    JPreston is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 01:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
    Gigabyte fanboi :)
     
    ExHail's Avatar
     
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Guildford
    Posts: 702
    Thanks: 7
    Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
    ExHail's system
    Are you people forgetting about how we get electricity??? Power plants are just as damaging to the ecosystem providing electricity for cars as petrol fumes are so at the moment there really isn't anything eco-friendly in terms of cars.

    ExHail is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 01:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
    SiM
    Senior Member
     
    SiM's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2006
    Location: London
    Posts: 6,222
    Thanks: 209
    Thanked 326 Times in 246 Posts
    SiM's system
    Originally Posted by AgentK View Post
    Are you people forgetting about how we get electricity??? Power plants are just as damaging to the ecosystem providing electricity for cars as petrol fumes are so at the moment there really isn't anything eco-friendly in terms of cars.
    Its a lot more efficient at producing energy though. The fuel is burnt in huge amounts in power stations, which is more efficient and making energy, than the fuel we burn in individual cars.
    SiM is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 01:53 AM   #8 (permalink)
    radix lecti
     
    dave87's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Sep 2005
    Location: Norwich (UEA), Essex Home :)
    Posts: 7,666
    Thanks: 33
    Thanked 105 Times in 75 Posts
    dave87's system
    SiM beat me to it, exactly what I was going to say. Add to that Nuclear that isn't available in cars for very good reasons, and you've got a source of energy much more efficient than petrol or diesel based car engines.

    Originally Posted by Bazzlad View Post
    Relax, Richard Dawkins is an idiot. He'll be dead soon.

    dave87 is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 07:43 AM   #9 (permalink)
    HEXUS.timelord.
     
    Zak33's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2003
    Location: In Sunny England
    Posts: 20,375
    Thanks: 344
    Thanked 209 Times in 142 Posts
    Zak33's system
    Originally Posted by dave87 View Post
    SiM beat me to it, exactly what I was going to say. Add to that Nuclear that isn't available in cars for very good reasons, and you've got a source of energy much more efficient than petrol or diesel based car engines.
    the problem then, is the need to distribute the electrcitiy,across the national grid, and then store it in batteries in the car, a car which frankly wieghs quite a lot because it's going to need a 2nd propulsion sourse for when the battery goes flat (ie a fossil fuel engine)

    I dont see electricity as efficient in my own mid. I just dont.


    HEXUS FOLDING TEAM | Zak's Weird Partition Theory | HEXUS GAMING.MAINPAGE |Don't be a big racist, give us Nuclear!
    Zak33 is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 08:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
    HEXUS.social member
     
    Funkstar's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: home
    Posts: 11,921
    Thanks: 168
    Thanked 277 Times in 247 Posts
    Funkstar's system
    There are some very cool technologies out there that should make electric motoring more realistic.

    Instead of having a single motor replacing the engine and leaving the rest of the car as it is, engineers are looking at having each wheel independently powered. The motors are mounted in just inside the wheels. Doing it like this means you can strip out a whole load of heavy mechanics from the drive train. You also get very efficient four wheel drive and an amazing amount of torque.

    You have also de-coupled the drive train from the energy source. In theory you could have batteries, an internal cobustion engine, gas turbine, fuel cell, etc. doesn't matter. So again, in theory, the car could have electric drive with a petrol engine now, then when battery technology improves the engine can be removed and batteries installed.

    Non fossil fuel vehicles will at some point become the norm, but not until engineers have removed a lot of the disadvantages they still have.
    Funkstar is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 08-05-2007, 09:28 AM   #11 (permalink)
    HEXUS.social member
     
    Funkstar's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: home
    Posts: 11,921
    Thanks: 168
    Thanked 277 Times in 247 Posts
    Funkstar's system
    And just to follow up with a couple of links.

    It appears that GM has decided to produce such a vehicle. From what i understand from the two articles on Engadget, the 1.0L engine used in one model will provide enough energy for about 640miles per tank fed through the L-Ion battery pack and then onto the electric wheel motors.

    Looks like there will be different options on the power generation side two, including fuel cells, but it sounds like these will be limited in number due to the price.

    Details about the concept from earlier in the year:
    http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/g...he-chevy-volt/

    Chevy Volt to go into production:
    http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/c...tion-pipeline/

    Personally i think it looks great. the final one will mroe than likely loose some of it's edgyness and looking more like a Crossfire, but that isn't really a bad thing, i like it too.
    Funkstar is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 10-05-2007, 01:26 PM   #12 (permalink)
    Muttonheaded
     
    Tumble's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2003
    Location: Right in the Pickle Barrel
    Posts: 5,289
    Thanks: 15
    Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
    The answer is in getting the batteries juiced up - they aint gonna be any use until a loaded battery can get you at least as far as a tank of petrol does now. Now either they've got to increase the energy density of the batteries, make insanely efficient motors, improve road surfaces/tyre materials or find some low impact way of charging the batteries as you go.

    As far as fuel cells and the like go, once people start developing them seriously, the price of the technology WILL fall - remember how much a digital watch cost in 1980? and now you can pick em up for a quid in Poundland. It's just a question of time and people developing the technology.


    Tumble is offline   Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Breadcrumb
    Go Back   HEXUS.community discussion forums > HEXUS.channels > General discussion > Question Time


    Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On
    Forum Jump



    All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM.

    Any representations/statements made on the HEXUS.community discussion forums are the representations/statements of the author i.e. the person/organisation making them. If any such representations/statements are disputed they are a matter between the parties concerned. HEXUS Limited accepts no responsibility for any misrepresentations, inaccurate or false statements made by any person/organisation other than HEXUS Limited employees.
    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
    Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
    © Copyright 2008 HEXUS® Limited. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction strictly prohibited.