Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Nasa & Russia's new Race to the moon.

  1. #1
    mutantbass head Lee H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    M28, Manchester
    Posts
    14,204
    Thanks
    337
    Thanked
    671 times in 580 posts
    • Lee H's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Carbon Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 8700K Unlocked CPU
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 LPX
      • Storage:
      • 250GB 960 EVO + a few more drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 6GB Palit GTX 1060 Dual
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W Modular Blue
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 PRO
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus MX279H & 24" Acer 3D GD245HQ + the 3D glasses
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media

    Nasa & Russia's new Race to the moon.

    I overheard on the news the other day that NASA and Russia are now in a mini "space-race" to see who can get to the moon the quickest to setup and start mining the moon as a possible source of helium3 which they want to use for fusion energy generation.

    While I sat there and ponder about fusion energy being clean and a great idea the alarm bells suddenly rang in the back of my head.

    What happens if they mine the moon and remove say at least 1/10th of the moons total weight by shipping rocks back to earth for processing. I'm relatively sure that this "process" might affect the moons gravitiational field and if this does what would happen to the earth's tidal processes?

    Would mining the moon cause adverse effects on the already fragile ecosystem that earth has now ?

  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    I can't even begin to imagine just how much stuff would make up 1/10 of the moons total weight.

    I think all the mining we could possibly concieve would only really put a little scratch on the surface and have very little effect on anything. The amount of litter and waste products left there would more than make up for it

    Not sure why people would want to fuse helium anyway - surely that's much harder and less efficient than creating helium from hydrogen?
    Last edited by kalniel; 09-02-2006 at 02:51 PM.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wirral/Manchester
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Thats a very good point you make although at the moment the us no longer has a rocket powerful enough to actally reach the moon, the last one that could was the saturn rocket but that was retired years ago. There might also be a far larger problem the moon exerts a stabalising effect over our rotation keeping it a farily steady angle and speed so removing the gravitational effect the moon exerts may have far greater concequences. Also there will be huge logistical restrains such as transporting the stuff to and from the moon. Also wouldnt the rocks be radio-acive and so would require processing at sites able to deal with this which would make it very expensive. Did the report say how long they were thinking all of this would take place?

  4. #4
    Капраз dkmech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    On an invisible submarine
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    17 times in 12 posts
    • dkmech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @3.16GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4gb ddr2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 2*640gb WD Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 6970
      • PSU:
      • 620
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 690
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Hanns G, 19" Hyundai L90D+
      • Internet:
      • 14Mb
    Moon.
    Major exports:
    Helium for party baloons and fusion reactors
    Major imports:
    Litter, rubbish, Garbage
    Tough on mirrors, tough on the causes of mirrors.

  5. #5
    sneaks quietly away. schmunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wiki Wiki Wild West side... of Sussex
    Posts
    4,424
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    163 times in 121 posts
    • schmunk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit NF7-S v2.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon-M 2500+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB of Corsair BH-5 and 512MB of something else
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Seagate Barracuda
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon X800Pro, flashed to XT
      • PSU:
      • Hiper Type-M ~400W
      • Case:
      • Antec cheapy
      • Monitor(s):
      • AG Neovo F19 LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 4MB/s
    I think this may be a joke, but just to be safe, stake your claim now!.

    Helium is very not dense (what's the opposite of dense..?), so it couldn't possibly make up 10% by mass of the Moon.

    Edit: Ok, not a joke, but very unlikely in the next few years... We don't even have a reactor capable of using the Helium3 yet.
    Last edited by schmunk; 09-02-2006 at 02:59 PM.

  6. #6
    Moderator DavidM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    8,779
    Thanks
    802
    Thanked
    252 times in 234 posts
    Not forgetting in "Space 1999" - the moon was used as a nuclear dumping ground...

  7. #7
    mutantbass head Lee H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    M28, Manchester
    Posts
    14,204
    Thanks
    337
    Thanked
    671 times in 580 posts
    • Lee H's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Carbon Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 8700K Unlocked CPU
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 LPX
      • Storage:
      • 250GB 960 EVO + a few more drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 6GB Palit GTX 1060 Dual
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W Modular Blue
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 PRO
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus MX279H & 24" Acer 3D GD245HQ + the 3D glasses
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060125...N5bnN1YmNhdA--

    Yahoo news's story on the russians idea to mine the moon

    The reason why they want helium 3 ?

    Simple... see the following image to see why


  8. #8
    Mike Fishcake
    Guest
    Erm, they want it because it makes your voice squeaky 3 times faster than normal helium?

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    It would be to expensive to mine and transport back.

    Anyway the Chinese are going to beat everyone to it.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC
    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel
    Not sure why people would want to fuse helium anyway - surely that's much harder and less efficient than creating helium from hydrogen?
    It requires less energy to start the Helium3+duterium reaction.
    H bombs use it.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee @ SCAN
    I overheard on the news the other day that NASA and Russia are now in a mini "space-race" to see who can get to the moon the quickest to setup and start mining the moon as a possible source of helium3 which they want to use for fusion energy generation.

    While I sat there and ponder about fusion energy being clean and a great idea the alarm bells suddenly rang in the back of my head.

    What happens if they mine the moon and remove say at least 1/10th of the moons total weight by shipping rocks back to earth for processing. I'm relatively sure that this "process" might affect the moons gravitiational field and if this does what would happen to the earth's tidal processes?

    Would mining the moon cause adverse effects on the already fragile ecosystem that earth has now ?
    If its to be used in Nuclear reactions then they need bugger all of it by mas to create a tremendous amount of energy
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  12. #12
    Flak Monkey! Dorza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    UK - South Wales
    Posts
    1,762
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked
    17 times in 15 posts
    • Dorza's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe - WiFi
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.06Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Crucial
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung SpinPoint
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce 9600GT
      • PSU:
      • Cosair HX520W
      • Case:
      • LianLi something something or other
      • Monitor(s):
      • Eizo FlexScan S1910 (1280*1024)
      • Internet:
      • 2mb Virgin (when they want to give me that: else 1mb)
    Lets not forget that the moon is already moving away from the earth at about 1" a year i believe. In many many years to come the affect the moon has on the earth will be too week to control tides and weather. The weather on the surface at that point will become very violent and probably uninhabitable.

    The moon has an amazing affect on the earth right now. Though I feel by the time any of that will happen and if we still exist we'll probably have some sort of technology to bring the moon back to a stable orbit or some device to control the weather/tides.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Pirate Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Petersfield, UK
    Posts
    764
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    If they remove as much through mining as you say they can why not replace it with rubbish from the earth?

    im sure the clangers wont mind

  14. #14
    Moderator DavidM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    8,779
    Thanks
    802
    Thanked
    252 times in 234 posts
    Take them some Heinz soup as well, it'll make a change for the Soup Dragon.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. GT4 Bonus Cars
    By Zak33 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 27-04-2005, 01:21 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-04-2005, 09:18 PM
  3. Toca Race Driver 2 Hexus Race
    By dkmech in forum Gaming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-09-2004, 09:56 AM
  4. the Boat Race
    By shiato storm in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 31-03-2004, 07:20 PM
  5. Moon Landings Real?
    By ERU in forum Question Time
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-12-2003, 10:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •