Read more.And a clue to it already being in game developer hands was Tweeted by DICE yesterday.
Read more.And a clue to it already being in game developer hands was Tweeted by DICE yesterday.
ON TOPIC: what happened to the idea of eliminating cross fire and SLI bridge cables? I JUST want to connect the two or more cards to the the PCIe slots without the need for CXfr-cables
ATI already does that and has done it for a generation.
Already possible
finally something to dethrone the 295X2! I wonder if it'll stay in the power connection spec, like the 295x2 doesn't?
I'm disappointed that the FuryX2 is going to be downclocked to lower speeds as nano. Does this mean some compute units, etc will be disabled?. I don't care if it will suck more than 300w. I want a full fat, highly clocked dual core gfx card. Let it come with 2 cooling plates (one on each gpu) and at least a 240mm radiator. I just want it to sink NVidia's dual core gpu.
At what price?
Gee, sounds cheap at that price, I was expecting more :-)
Just a pity it may not be set to run at full pace.
If you are spending that much on something like this, you would expect it to be running as fast as possible, otherwise what is the point - or maybe it is to get 4K running at higher frames. Who knows until reviewers can get a hold of one.
Now that we're in the predicted release month, my money's on a £1.5k price tag on release. It matches what the 295X2 went for, and it ought to outperform the titan X enough to warrant the price
It would be good if AMD could sell them at that price but I dont think they could.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)