Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    281
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    10 times in 10 posts
    • Antagram's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock H97M-ITX/ac
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4570S
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix Tactical 8GB 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Intel 335 Series 180GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac 750 Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone ST30SF
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG05W
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP Pavilion 24XW
      • Internet:
      • 40Mb max

    SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    I was looking at a Corsair Reactor SSD so checked the Corsair website.

    Just interested to know why memory companies have decided to copy the same sizing scheme as traditional hard drive manufacturers?

    Quote Originally Posted by Corsair website
    1 megabyte (MB) = 1 million bytes; 1 gigabyte (GB) = 1 billion bytes

    Unformatted capacity is the total amount of memory on the drive. The total formatted capacity for the drive will be lower, depending on the operating system and file system used.
    Just seems like memory companies are following the status quo for their own benefit.

  2. #2
    Moderator chuckskull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    7,713
    Thanks
    951
    Thanked
    690 times in 463 posts
    • chuckskull's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.7 - H100i
      • Memory:
      • 32GB XMS3 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 850 Pro + 3TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980Ti Classified
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 700W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VG278HE
      • Internet:
      • FTTC

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    I imagine because if they didn't they wouldn't sell many drives, people would instantly discount them because they would appear smaller.

    People are used to the status quo now. While more technically minded end users gripe a bit, most people just accept it, even those who understand the fallacy. Until that switches around there's no incentive to change.

    It's a bit stupid and is certainly misleading but people vote with their wallets and no-ones stopped buying hard drives because of it.

    No-one stopped paying for their up to 8mb 'unlimited' broadband either or buying cars with slightly fluffed 0-60 and mpg figures. Same deal there. Almost gives you the impression us consumers like being lied to, to make us feel better about what we're buying.

    I don't agree with it, but if I was selling either product and every single competitor was doing it, every customer accepting it, I wouldn't risk my bottom line being a pedant.

  3. Received thanks from:

    Blade285 (27-06-2010)

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    143 times in 119 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    Thats because 1MB is 1000Bytes, in standard SI units.

    And 1MiB is 1024Bytes, in IEC units.

    Of course, it would be nice if everyone used the same units for everything, instead of whichever makes it look bigger or "rounder".

  5. #4
    Headless Chicken Terbinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,670
    Thanks
    1,210
    Thanked
    727 times in 595 posts
    • Terbinator's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock H61M
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon 1230-V3
      • Memory:
      • Geil Evo Corsa 2133/8GB
      • Storage:
      • M4 128GB, 2TB WD Red
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX Titan
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX760i
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 130
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp U2711H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60Mb.

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    Thats because 1MB is 1000KBytes, in standard SI units.

    And 1MiB is 1024Bytes, in IEC units.

    Of course, it would be nice if everyone used the same units for everything, instead of whichever makes it look bigger or "rounder".
    Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
    CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
    TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
    for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.

  6. #5
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    965 times in 816 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    This is always how flash memory has been packaged, SSDs are just very fast flash memory, so there lies the connection.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    143 times in 119 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Terbinator View Post
    lol oops

    I wondered who would spot that first

    The 2nd line is also similarly incorrect and should say "And 1MiB is 1024KBytes, in IEC units."

  8. #7
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,457
    Thanks
    613
    Thanked
    1,645 times in 1,307 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: SSD's and quoted capacities following mechanical sizing?

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    lol oops

    I wondered who would spot that first

    The 2nd line is also similarly incorrect and should say "And 1MiB is 1024KBytes, in IEC units."
    Surely that should say 1 MiB is 1024 KiBytes

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •