Re: Telephoto upgrade time?
you say more flexible, all but the 70-300 you've quoted are all within your current focal range?
what is it you actually want?
Re: Telephoto upgrade time?
Same point as Bobster - you're already very flexible with your 18-50 + 55-200 so that doesn't seem to be the main criteria.
Ease of a single lens system.. I can understand that, but if you're willing to compromise the advantages of a DLSR to get that (as you would be a little using the 18-200) then you might want to just get a good compact for the times when you truly need compactness and ease of carrying etc.
If I were in your place I'd get the 105/100 macro (be that nikkor/tokina/sigma) - it addresses low-light gigs (a bit) and opens up macro, so seems to bring the most to the table for your money.
Re: Telephoto upgrade time?
Apologies for being unclear, I was surfing onestop digital while I was writing and I kept finding lenses I liked the look of.
Simply: I want an upgrade to my 55-200mm.
Options:
-Get something similar specced, but inherently a lot more flexible, like a 'superzoom' 18-200mm
-Get something better, like a 70-300 or a classic 70-200 f2.8
-Keep the 55-200 and get some decent glass somewhere between 100-200 (i.e. 105mm f2.8)
Kalniel - I have thought seriously about buying a decent compact, I'd love to get an ixus and put CHDK on it. The reason I thought 18-200 was because spec-wise it's more or less the same as the 55-200, but with that additional wide end. I've used the 55-200 for gigs before and if the light is ok, it's fantastic (VR helps a bit). I tend to use it, oddly enough, as my main gig lens because it's just wide enough to get a body shot in and long enough to get a head shot if necessary. That said, if the light is rubbish, then not much you can do with it.
:)
Re: Telephoto upgrade time?
if you're concentrating on gig photography, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX is the way to go