It's Sat 5th Feb 2005 and I AINT SEEN IT YET
I guess I better sort that situ now
/shouts down stairs SAIR....Matrix tonight
right...laterz
Printable View
It's Sat 5th Feb 2005 and I AINT SEEN IT YET
I guess I better sort that situ now
/shouts down stairs SAIR....Matrix tonight
right...laterz
Zak...where you been mate?.
:heckle:
Blimey! Got some watching to do tonight then!. .;) . . Once you have watched Reloaded you will then just HAVE to watch Revolutions. .! Theres just too many questions!
Enjoy! :p
;)
Dont watch it unless you can watch one revolutions after it.
Reloaded + rev. are not 2 films. They are one. Just split in 2 for the cinemas.
If you watch them as 2, you wont enjoy it half as much.
rgr...we didnt watch it cos of you lot ;)
heh.. i think revolutions is pooh personally.. ruins the lot
someone should remake the sequel (and third?) to the first matrix. just call it something else and put a rumour on the internet that it's the sequel to the matrix.
don't watch, it's sh!t, how could they ruin a perfectly good franchise with two turd sequels.
and revolutions just creates more questions and endless paradoxes, especially the crucificition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomahawk
Wachowski brothers attempted to put far too much content in even too 2 hour films, revolutions was technically superior to reloaded from a storyline point of view, however reloaded wins on the action. Just a shame the Wachowski brothers couldn't work out what direction they wanted to head the series in, instead trying to smuggle in as much content as possible...
Hey... at least Hugo Weaving stole the entire series :)