Ivy Bridge launched according to them, I thought the NDA was on until 6pm?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17785464
Ivy Bridge launched according to them, I thought the NDA was on until 6pm?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17785464
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Intel sent out a press release today and forgot to put a time on the embargo Or they put "Embargoed until 10.00am 23rd April 2012" without using a time zone.
I strongly doubt that the BBC had the kind of privileged access to technical information / early silicon that would have required them to sign an NDA, tbh. There's nothing in that report beyond the release date (and number of SKUs) that wasn't already public knowledge - basically that it's called Ivy Bridge and uses 3D tri-gate transistors. Could be a break of embargo, but almost certainly not a break of NDA.
The entire launch has been a farce - we've had samples for literally months....
.... it's not a great way of them doing things.
Entire previews have been done on samples before as well, eg: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5626/i...-core-i7-3770k
Out of interest when Hexus put up their review,I assume you will be putting up a CPU-Z screenshot like you did with the Core i7 2600K review??
Supposedly,there is a significant change between the E0 engineering and E1 production steppings as the GPU section is now much larger.
Edit!!
BTW,Legit Reviews put up their Core i7-3770K review up early and they need 1.52V to hit 4.9GHZ??!! However,they soon pulled it!!
I just checked again - it was 4.9GHZ,so I suspect that current Ivy Bridge Core i7 samples when overclocked to their maximum will be similar in performance to Sandy Bridge Core i7 samples when overclocked to their maximum. I expect that Ivy Bridge probably will consume a bit less power,but at those voltages the CPU section is going to run hot IMHO.
Perhaps,lower overclocks which need lower voltage will be more in the favour of Ivy Bridge.
However the E1 production samples have a much large IGP now:
http://www.chip-architect.com/news/2...es_Sandys.html
The die picture is of a Core i5 3550.
Low PC sales and continued recession = lots of chips still kicking around
Bulldozer not living up to a lot of peoples hopes
I doubt they have problems, they just saw an opportunity to clear the stock without losing market share......or at least it completely stinks of it.......
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Luckily,I don't care if IB needs better cooling when overclocked. One of the 69W Xeon E3-1230 V2 CPUs will be eventually a nice replacement for my 65W Core i3 2100!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)