Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

  1. #1
    Senior Member MrNeil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    559
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    63 times in 38 posts
    • MrNeil's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z490 VISION G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 10700KF
      • Memory:
      • 16gig G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz
      • Storage:
      • x2 Kingston 240GB HyperX SSDWD + 480gig evo 500GB Caviar Blue Hard
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Vega 56 Red Dragon
      • PSU:
      • 850W EVGA SuperNOVA G2,
      • Case:
      • NZXT H440 STEEL Mid Tower
      • Operating System:
      • Window 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC G2770PF 144Hz and a HP 27hq
      • Internet:
      • TalkyTalk 76mb

    Smile Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    At the moment i have a FX6300 housed into a Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P. Now i am thinking about going for a i5 Skylake cpu to replace my current AMD build ! This could be my 2nd ever intel cpu since my Celeron 633, from that i always had AMD.

    The new AMD cpu's are on the way so would it be worth the wait and use my £250 (or don't tell the wife £300) on that ?

    Mostly gaming like BF4 and ARma 3 type games but i am not into squeezing every ounce of FPS out off games !

    Many thanks
    Neil

  2. #2
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,009
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    Only you can really answer that, but a couple of thoughts might help:

    We can only guess, but it is unlikely that Zen will be any faster than Skylake. So if you buy Skylake now you should get Zen like levels of performance, or at least close enough either way that you can probably measure but not feel the difference.
    Zen might be cheaper than an i5, but again we won't know for ages.
    Zen will be out towards the end of the year, which is a long time to wait.
    I'm not one for overclocking, but in this case a mild overclock just up to FX6350 levels should be relatively safe. If you can't tell any difference, the an i5 won't be much better.
    Your 7950 graphics card is still pretty good, though modern cards are better at tessellation which modern games seem to be using more. You might be better off saving your money until the summer, and seeing what new graphics card pricing looks like when Polaris comes out.

  3. Received thanks from:

    MrNeil (01-02-2016)

  4. #3
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    ... I'm not one for overclocking, but in this case a mild overclock just up to FX6350 levels should be relatively safe. ...
    I'm going to echo this, and point out that you're running under a closed-loop water cooler and your motherboard has good cooling on the VRMs, so you're never going to get a much safer overclock. You should be good to run at at least 4GHz, possibly faster - just keep an eye on your CPU temperature and general system stability.

  5. Received thanks from:

    MrNeil (01-02-2016)

  6. #4
    Senior Member MrNeil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    559
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    63 times in 38 posts
    • MrNeil's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z490 VISION G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 10700KF
      • Memory:
      • 16gig G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz
      • Storage:
      • x2 Kingston 240GB HyperX SSDWD + 480gig evo 500GB Caviar Blue Hard
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Vega 56 Red Dragon
      • PSU:
      • 850W EVGA SuperNOVA G2,
      • Case:
      • NZXT H440 STEEL Mid Tower
      • Operating System:
      • Window 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC G2770PF 144Hz and a HP 27hq
      • Internet:
      • TalkyTalk 76mb

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    My other option was actually to get another card but will i get a bottleneck with my FX6300 ? Maybe the new Polais or Nvidia 970 card ?
    I have set my cpu to run at 4.1GHz while gaming which i see as being very safe !

    Cheers for the input guys !

  7. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    You could go higher than 4.1ghz with ease, depends on the games you play, 6300 should still be able to do its job.

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    229
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Wam7's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X79 Sabertooth
      • CPU:
      • I7 3930K @ 4.9 Ghz 24/7
      • Memory:
      • 24GB Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 240 GB 2x 3TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GTX670 & GT430
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster M2 Pro 1000W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF-X
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Tri monitor - 27" Iiyama 2x Dell 19"
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 120Mb

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    I'd be more inclined to spend the money on a GPU. What res are you gaming at? The 970's is a great card which is why it is one of the best sellling GPU's of all time. Though if the rumours are to be believed Nvida are releasing a new GPU in June/July (but who knows when!) so bear that in mind

  9. #7
    Senior Member MrNeil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    559
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    63 times in 38 posts
    • MrNeil's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z490 VISION G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 10700KF
      • Memory:
      • 16gig G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz
      • Storage:
      • x2 Kingston 240GB HyperX SSDWD + 480gig evo 500GB Caviar Blue Hard
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Vega 56 Red Dragon
      • PSU:
      • 850W EVGA SuperNOVA G2,
      • Case:
      • NZXT H440 STEEL Mid Tower
      • Operating System:
      • Window 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC G2770PF 144Hz and a HP 27hq
      • Internet:
      • TalkyTalk 76mb

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    I am using a Samsung S24D300 monitor !
    A very good capable monitor

  10. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    watford, herts
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • jamiehard1989's system
      • Motherboard:
      • z87x-oc
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690k
      • Memory:
      • hyperx 16gb
      • Storage:
      • 500gb evo 850, 2tb hd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 7970
      • PSU:
      • ocz zx 850w
      • Case:
      • nzxt phantom 630
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • lg 42" tv (vsr 1440p)

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    Try get your cpu to run at 4.5ghz, should be able to do with less than 1.4volts also in bios set the llc to medium to get the best stable vcore, give the 7950 a overclock.

    I had that board with a 6300 @4.8ghz, then went 8350 @4.8ghz.

    Also bf4 loves more threads, if you went intel now, your mainly see better minimals.

    Arma is better on intel as single threaded game, plus runs like crap.

    I would wait a couple of months to see when new gpu's come out and we should get more info about zen.

  11. #9
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Skylake or wait for next AMD ?

    BF4 should be fine on your CPU but ARMA3 is one of the most single threaded limited FPS games released in modern times - even on Intel setups people complain of poor performance and something like an overclocked Pentium G3258 was duking it out with Core i7 4790K CPUs IIRC!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •