Since when is a RTS game about amazing graphics though. I didn't even use full DX9 details...and thats on a core2duo @ 3.3Ghz, X1950XT and 2Gb Ram
Since when is a RTS game about amazing graphics though. I didn't even use full DX9 details...and thats on a core2duo @ 3.3Ghz, X1950XT and 2Gb Ram
I'm going to be another of those hmmm so what people. I own the game and in my personal opinion Command & Conquer is a better game
All comments listed above are for comical purpose only. Any offense taken by them is purely accidental and coincidental. If you have any questions about said response, a support line is available.
I'm not too bothered, the game seems to be massively CPU based anyway, DX10 graphics would be nice but on a strategy game I don't think there would be that much difference that is noticible.
IMO strategy games in general don't really need DX10 due to the zoomed out perspective that is normally used
Would be nice...but the game is certainly still worth playing without it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)